Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
SetApp didn't update mine. Easy SetApp W.

1717575105109.jpeg
 
Apple should just make this part of the OS. It's ridiculous that a tool is needed to manage this.

Apple should have bought Bartender (and SoundSource while we're at it), as they are great apps that bring much needed functionality to MacOS.

Alas, for now we're all in limbo waiting to see who these new owners are and whether we'll ever get another good tool like this to manage our menubar.
 
Did not even know this Tool existed. Sounds cool but now I am gonna wait.

Do they operate in the EU? Shouldn't the actual owner be obligated to be legally listed in the privacy policy or imprint on their website at the very least?
 
Did not even know this Tool existed. Sounds cool but now I am gonna wait.

Do they operate in the EU? Shouldn't the actual owner be obligated to be legally listed in the privacy policy or imprint on their website?
If it’s in the App Store the privacy policy should be linked there.

When I deployed an iOS app, a privacy policy was mandatory, so I assume it will be the d same for the Mac App Store.
 
BTW, for those who might have Parallels Toolbox, there is also its Hide Menu Icons tool: rather basic, but seems to work well (and now also has a Bartender Bar-like additional option). Let’s hope that the new Bartender devs will make clear who they are and what they want to do, anyway…


(… Hmmm: still seems buggy, as it didn’t remember the exact order of the hidden menu bar items upon reboot.)
 
Last edited:
Apple should have bought Bartender (and SoundSource while we're at it), as they are great apps that bring much needed functionality to MacOS.

Alas, for now we're all in limbo waiting to see who these new owners are and whether we'll ever get another good tool like this to manage our menubar.

The conspiracy theorist in me wonders if the developer was cashing out because he thought it was only a matter of time before it ended up being Sherlock’ed by Apple?
 
  • Like
Reactions: wanha
Easy solution,
Don’t download random apps you found on sketchy sites on the internet that you cannot verify the authenticity of, and don’t give any apps permission to screen record or access your drive or your personal information, unless you know it legitimately needs that access to do a function YOU want it do.

Problem solved.

that's not the situation at all, so hardly "problem solved" lol
 
The conspiracy theorist in me wonders if the developer was cashing out because he thought it was only a matter of time before it ended up being Sherlock’ed by Apple?

That could well be! With the addition of the notch to Macs, the menubar organization problem is more pressing than ever and Apple must be at least considering doing something about it
 
FWIW, I've just emailed Applause (the buyers of Bartender) to raise the concern of screen recording on an app where you don't know the new owner and their intentions, and that using Bartender is just too great of a security threat as things stand.

If I get a reply, I'll re-post it here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: drmacnut
If Apple did buy Bartender, I don't think they'd be so cagey about it. As an example, think about the acquisition of Dark Sky. Apple was pretty clear that they bought the app, and that they did so to improve their own Weather app.
"Apple buys smaller technology companies from time to time, and we generally do not discuss our purpose or plans."
 
  • Like
Reactions: nathansz
Serious question. Is the reaction to this (I do not have the app) based on similar concerns of how iOS apps get sold and the new owners end up switching to a subscription model, changing privacy policies, gathering your info and selling it off whereas previously the app was considered much more “user safe”?
 
Easy solution,
Don’t download random apps you found on sketchy sites on the internet that you cannot verify the authenticity of, and don’t give any apps permission to screen record or access your drive or your personal information, unless you know it legitimately needs that access to do a function YOU want it do.

Problem solved.
Tell me you don't now anything about Bartender without telling me you don't know anything about Bartender.
 
HiddenBar is great. I've also come across Ice (GitHub link for those interested) being recommended recently, but I haven't tried it myself yet. It seems to offer a bit more visual customisation than HiddenBar, which isn't really something I need. Has anyone here tried both?
I had been using Dozen instead Bartender for long time as I just wanted to manage the menu bar, but Dozen has not been updated for years. I just tried Ice and it seems really well-polished. It is also an active open-source project that I can rely on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: boss.king
It shouldn't take much effort to get the info what type of app are owned by the new ownder since the Store shows them to you. Would have expected it to be done before one writes such accusations.
 
It shouldn't take much effort to get the info what type of app are owned by the new ownder since the Store shows them to you. Would have expected it to be done before one writes such accusations.

Hi nick, you might want to read this before you write such accusations yourself :)

TL;DR:

"Ben Surtees has sold Bartender to a dubious company called "App Sub 1 LLC" who first used their own signature to sign Bartender but because that raised too much suspicion they now founded a new company called 'Bartender App LLC' or maybe just got a certificate under that name. they refuse to give any information about the takeover and what exactly has happened"
 
At this point, it does not appear that Bartender's new owners plan to inform customers about the change in ownership, but users should be aware that the app has been sold and is no longer being updated by the original developer. The new owner's intentions are not clear, but as Reddit users have pointed out, the situation raises some red flags.

Why do app owners have to make their intentions clear?

People use an app for its functionality, not who owns the code behind it.

Reporter Juli Clover: Paranoia at its worst. 🙄
 
It’s worth remembering that in order to work Bartender uses the screen recording API
 
A letter from Ben Surtees, the old owner, would also go a long way.
Normally in such transactions the previous owner is not allowed to communicate anything regarding the transaction without permission because every type of communication may have an impact on the market / customers which is none of his business anymore.
 
And people here say that sideloading on macOS is doing perfectly fine.

You have to uninstall things in panic and always stay alert because your custom menu bar app may start spying on you, but it's perfectly fine I guess 🤣

Now imagine the number of people who don't go regularly on forums and missed this info.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.