All right, a few things. First, I am able to find words to express what I feel after reading through the two initial puppy stories, so that means this post might seem overboard. Second, just reading the title of the thread makes me want to kill someone. Third, the 13 year old that did essentially destroy the puppy's future has no developed understanding or respect for morals, much less, no respect for the potential of the life of a household pet that serves as a source of future positive memories. I've determined that puppies are so cherished among almost everyone because they best resemble the positive childhood memories that a person has with stuffed animals. So treating a puppy as he did shows just how little (if at all) caring he has about wanting to remember his past childhood memories of stuffed animals. It also shows that he doesn't want to care about remembering any linkage between the innocence of stuffed animals and his childhood caring and relationship with them, and the innocence of a real animal that so closely resembles his childhood memories.
Fourth, I'm willing to bet that the 13 year old is aware of the puppy's injuries, but, at the time the puppy was in his control, he forced himself to think otherwise, and I'm willing to bet that he's reflecting back on the damages he's done to the puppy and the puppy's loss as a result of his actions. I bet you that his consciousness has kicked his memory back to the reality of his childhood memories with stuffed animals and sharing his emotions of innocence, only now, to a far greater amplitude due to knowing what real, physical damage he has done to the puppy. So the 13-year-old was, at the time, apathetic, cruel, puppy-destructive, memory-destructive, self-destructive, and seriously ignorant to set his state of mind away from the reality of physical destruction to a puppy, something that resembles well cherished and personal childhood memories. As Hemingray said, he should be forced to look at that picture for the rest of eternity, as that will further destroy the boy's own mental stability in terms of being able to establish positive memories in his future, and hence, make the boy feel like his life isn't worth living.
Fifth, I can't even go back to those articles to dwell on the details of the injuries and the ultimate consequence. It's so sickening and, more accurately, so disruptive to my imagination to have such an image with its related components (the injuries and consequence) burned in my mind in detail.
Sixth, about the hazing article: Big deal. That's far more commonplace than dog cruelty, and it's most likely not going to be as memory-based as the puppy article(s) in terms of magnitude.
Finally, for the love of Jeff, no more saddening current events like this!