Worthless since it only works with a .mac account, but typical of Apple to keep us on the money leash.
What makes you think this will only work with .mac?
Have you missed the other announcements?
Worthless since it only works with a .mac account, but typical of Apple to keep us on the money leash.
I fail to see how it would be able to do this over Wi-fi, though, because with Wi-Fi you would have to maintain a connection all the time for push to work (a "pushed" request is not going to be able to go through a NAT'ed firewall without there being an existing connection, and hence draining your battery).
Worthless since it only works with a .mac account, but typical of Apple to keep us on the money leash.
Worthless since it only works with a .mac account, but typical of Apple to keep us on the money leash.
I fail to see how it would be able to do this over Wi-fi, though, because with Wi-Fi you would have to maintain a connection all the time for push to work (a "pushed" request is not going to be able to go through a NAT'ed firewall without there being an existing connection, and hence draining your battery).
I think we need to see some real-world results before making assumptions like this.
Apple really should have supported IMAP IDLE from the get-go in iphone Mail just like they do in Mail.app on OS X. Would solve a lot of the push complaints from non-exchange/yahoo providers, like oh .mac and most other imap providers.
And even with this I wouldn't sign up for .mac. I'm not paying $100 for something that can easily be duplicated with a pro flickr account, a gmail address, and a wordpress.com blog. Even paying for flickr the whole thing is only $25/year.
I wish it could push calendar items too. I update my calendar on my MBP but sync my phone with my mini. It would be great to get calendar changes as they happen!
![]()
Using push email does not conserve battery life unless you get fewer emails than polling intervals each day--and the kinds of hyper-obsessive people who feel they "need" push email get a constant stream, so it will not be the case. Periodic polling is the least battery-intensive method because it does not require an active connection; the only time it is wasteful is if the poll comes back empty (i.e. no new mail).if it was every five minutes it'd give you horrid battery life. push helps conserve the battery life since it doesn't have to check the server.
I think he was referring to the supposed battery savings, since the only way the article statement could be true is if Apple has invented some new technology.RIM does this, that's pretty real world.![]()
Im really confused about this push mail thing..
at the moment as im just starting out with the iphone (and as Ive found out ive used $90 of data usage already)! i'm limiting my internet usage to keep my bill down.. will this push email service mean it will cost more in terms of downloads? does it mean its always busy doing something in the background all the time?
can i disconnect/connect from push mail whenever i want?
and i know this is a dumb qn, but if i sign up for .mac can i access my .mac account over the internet? sorry im a newbie!
Im really confused about this push mail thing..
at the moment as im just starting out with the iphone (and as Ive found out ive used $90 of data usage already)! i'm limiting my internet usage to keep my bill down.. will this push email service mean it will cost more in terms of downloads? does it mean its always busy doing something in the background all the time?
can i disconnect/connect from push mail whenever i want?
and i know this is a dumb qn, but if i sign up for .mac can i access my .mac account over the internet? sorry im a newbie!
isn't this all par & arcel of the new mobileme service anyway?
ie, PUSH email, PUSH calendar, PUSH contacts...