Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
he was responding to the OP who said the video sent from iPhone 4 to iPhone 4 was of low quality. that in itself means it was compressed as pretty much any video you make on an iPhone 4 will be over 300Kb. Intell's point of it being compressed was correct, as the conversation was about the video..... you're still bringing up the 2nd part, which i have already agreed was irrelevant and wrong, so why you keep banging on about that i have no idea.

So people can post complete nonsense as long as the first part of their post is (sorta) correct?
 
So people can post complete nonsense as long as the first part of their post is (sorta) correct?

his post wasn't complete nonsense though. there was just a little incorrect fact at the end, which, rather than say actually that last part isn't right, you claimed the whole post was wrong, then go on to pretty much confirm he was right and spout a load of extra irrelevant info to make people think you're so smart....
 
No I didn't.

You assumed that I was referring to the whole post.

"Little incorrect fact at the end"!? It was half of the post!!!

lol at best it was a 3rd of the post and it was a tacked on thing. plus since you quoted the WHOLE post and your repsonse was a general one, you started off "That's not the issue. Your phone will resize a photo/video/audio clip to whatever the "MMS Max Message Size" setting is set to in: Settings > General > Network > Cellular Data Network" then you have a bit tacked on the end about the receipient device, your post reads as a 2 part response to the initial post having 2 points....
 
lol at best it was a 3rd of the post and it was a tacked on thing. plus since you quoted the WHOLE post and your repsonse was a general one, you started off "That's not the issue. Your phone will resize a photo/video/audio clip to whatever the "MMS Max Message Size" setting is set to in: Settings > General > Network > Cellular Data Network" then you have a bit tacked on the end about the receipient device, your post reads as a 2 part response to the initial post having 2 points....

My post wasn't intended to be interpreted that way.

I was saying that YOUR phone determines what size it should send the MMS at.

I was trying to stress that the recipient's phone plays no part in determining the size of the MMS when it is sent.

300kb is too high for many phones, but that doesn't matter because of the way MMS works.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.