arian19 macrumors 6502 Original poster Apr 18, 2014 #1 Is Apple never going to let Metro PCS have the iPhone because John Sculley is tied to Metro PCS? It sounds plausible, right? Anyone have an opinion?
Is Apple never going to let Metro PCS have the iPhone because John Sculley is tied to Metro PCS? It sounds plausible, right? Anyone have an opinion?
D deeddawg macrumors G5 Apr 18, 2014 #2 I'm pretty sure Jobs is dead and someone else is leading Apple these days.
T5BRICK macrumors G3 Apr 18, 2014 #3 I can't find the article but I swear I read about MetroPCS declining when they were given the chance to offer the iPhone.
I can't find the article but I swear I read about MetroPCS declining when they were given the chance to offer the iPhone.
Applejuiced macrumors Westmere Apr 18, 2014 #5 arian19 said: Is Apple never going to let Metro PCS have the iPhone because John Sculley is tied to Metro PCS? It sounds plausible, right? Anyone have an opinion? Click to expand... Im pretty sure it has nothing to do with John or Steve or Peter. Metro is bought out by Tmobile anyway so pretty sure it wont matter. They already started to shut off the metropcs network in 3 US cities and started shifting customers to Tmobile.
arian19 said: Is Apple never going to let Metro PCS have the iPhone because John Sculley is tied to Metro PCS? It sounds plausible, right? Anyone have an opinion? Click to expand... Im pretty sure it has nothing to do with John or Steve or Peter. Metro is bought out by Tmobile anyway so pretty sure it wont matter. They already started to shut off the metropcs network in 3 US cities and started shifting customers to Tmobile.