Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Quick reply?
- Thread starter RobertD63
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
This has come up a number of times, and we've always declined to do it because we prefer that people think before they post. It sounds dumb, but making people actually go through the effort of loading another page decreases the "chattiness" of the discussion and increases post quality.
But that's certainly not to say that it's a final decision, and we appreciate continued suggestions and discussion regarding these types of things.
But that's certainly not to say that it's a final decision, and we appreciate continued suggestions and discussion regarding these types of things.
Quick Reply does not give you the full options with which to "express" yourself.
I'm with the Board on this one.
I'm with the Board on this one.
So you primarily equate having a Quick Reply feature with chattiness/spamminess on other forums, and that not the culture/subject matter/moderation temperament/forum rules to be more important criteria?
But more importantly, what are you doing up so early?
But more importantly, what are you doing up so early?
It's not a matter of one or the other, but why make chatting any easier?
This is the eighth thread requesting this feature. In the first, Arn gave this reply:
And Mudbug, another forum admin gave this reply:
And in 2006 on the same topic, Doctor Q also replied with this:
I'm just reiterating the admin's conventional and long-held wisdom on this.
OK. Thanks for that. I should point out arn's post said nothing about it increasing chattiness. Who actually reads MacRumors in threaded mode?
DoctorQ's quote you snipped out the first sentence which refers to this post:
I find it convenient, but not completely necessary so I won't belabour the point. Although.... Quick Reply would be immensely useful in the Friday Chatterbox threads. Imagine it, could be the highlight of my Friday nights.
DoctorQ's quote you snipped out the first sentence which refers to this post:
I've highlighted the pertinent word, which still doesn't answer the question.
I find it convenient, but not completely necessary so I won't belabour the point. Although.... Quick Reply would be immensely useful in the Friday Chatterbox threads. Imagine it, could be the highlight of my Friday nights.
At first when I joined here, I thought QuickReply would be good, then I changed my mind. I like having the opportunity to edit my posts, read over them and fix mistakes if I can.That is, if spot them in time.
I was just thinking of asking this, seems like someone beat me to it.
I would like to point out that, if your Internet is slow or acting up, it requires you load two pages if you're not using quick reply. (Math correct? To the reply, back to the thread?)
Many a post has been stopped by time constraints, like yesterday....
"Shouldn't you be studying?"
"Um.... *types*"
"TURN THAT OFF NOW!!!"
That never saw the light of day. I can't remember what it was I was posting, but I'm sure it was a matter pf pressing importance.
I would like to point out that, if your Internet is slow or acting up, it requires you load two pages if you're not using quick reply. (Math correct? To the reply, back to the thread?)
Many a post has been stopped by time constraints, like yesterday....
"Shouldn't you be studying?"
"Um.... *types*"
"TURN THAT OFF NOW!!!"
That never saw the light of day. I can't remember what it was I was posting, but I'm sure it was a matter pf pressing importance.
The pertinent word, as you refer to it, was posted by a moderator. Four of a kind of moderators is still trumped by three of a kind of forum administrators.
This simple formula should help OP understand the situation
Quick reply = mountains of "+1" posts...
Quick reply = mountains of "+1" posts...
But later became one, because they were deemed the responsibility of becoming one, it just shows that devilot had the right ideas and thoughts to be made into a mod...
A couple of points.
1. I think there's a hack so that QR posts without a parent become children of the OP, similar to how regular replies do.
1b. But really, does anyone read any vBulletin board in threaded mode anyway?
2. I don't think QR makes threads chattier (based on experience). Those who want to be chatty are definitely not stopped by one extra mouse click - read any new product announcement thread here.
1. I think there's a hack so that QR posts without a parent become children of the OP, similar to how regular replies do.
1b. But really, does anyone read any vBulletin board in threaded mode anyway?
2. I don't think QR makes threads chattier (based on experience). Those who want to be chatty are definitely not stopped by one extra mouse click - read any new product announcement thread here.
Is there a way the admins could put rating in the forum posts? I always want to say +1, but I hate them and think they waste the post count just as much as the next person.
Ratings have been discussed many times, and the general feeling most veteran site members have is that it would create a too competitive atmosphere that loses its focus from what the forums are intended to be.
After you spend some time in the forums, you will automatically get a sense of who gives good advice and who doesn't; that is arguably the best rating system there can be as it is one that was created by you, tailored for you, and changeable by no one but you.
Succinctness doesn't imply a lack of merit.
The mods here are fairly good, and posts that are "+1" or in the same spirit are generally removed with haste.
Help them out by reporting posts.
"+1" posts are ones that quote another previous post in the thread and merely add "+1." They basically agree with the quoted post, but offer nothing new to the discussion.
Since they're also quick and easy to write, they're viewed as a tad spamish by the rules.
As you explain it, +1 posts with not other information add nothing to the discussion and essentially amounts to a poll. I guess those who disagree would just have to post -1 to indicate their dissent. Very lame.
Which is exactly why the rules specify not to write such short and simple posts. Substance is the key; a poll can be added to any thread and if the thread was intended to have one, it would.