I do agree that QT X is lacking in various features that existed in QT 7, but after reading the Ars Technica article, I can see why... and like another poster, would expect features to start being reintroduced in QT X as they get reimplemented in Cocoa.
The ArsTechnica review is a bad joke. Would any one accept the following: "as we had to completely rewrite Finder, we did not manage to add all features it previously had. It's much faster now. But you'll have to wait for the next update until you may delete files. Also there's no way to autosort the files yet, but there is a terminal prompt you can use if you want the files in a folder sorted by e.g. their name."
They should have kept QT 7 the default and release QTX when it's ready. Noone forced them to default to an unfinished app in 10.6.
What a joke.
The ArsTechnica review is a bad joke.
Huh? Perian works fine in QTX.No working Perian etc currently makes it worse, but i'd imagine they have people on that.
QTX doesn't work with Perian but QTX Player does since it uses QT7 to do it.
Completely disappointed with Quicktime X. I strongly feel that an apology and explanation from the Quicktime Dev Team is in order. Anyone else agree?
The Ars Technica review is the most detailed and comprehensive review of 10.6 that exists as it explains all of the underlying technology [...]
It didn't help Apple, when they make customers feel desperate to get their hands on snow leopard! It's not that Microsoft never made this error in the past with Vista!
No it doesn't. That's absolute nonsense.
Wrong, QT7 is fine.
Just because YOU don't agree with the points John Siracusa makes[...]