Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Glad to see they resurrected the XSERVE style rack mounting option!

It will go along nicely with my XSERVE 3,1 1U rack mounted server from 2011....
 
Can't wait for the YouTube videos showing how someone added ground effects lighting to make it glow different colors.

And maybe some hydraulics to make it pancake and hop along a table. All wirelessly controlled from an iPhone.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: snek
That isn't a stupid question. A lot (maybe most) server motherboards have on-board graphics. On-board graphics is generally CPU dependent. I don't think the Xeon W supports it. Might be wrong, as I haven't used them personally, but a quick review of intel's spec page suggests I am correct.

There's a distinction between on-board and integrated graphics. Xeons generally do not have integrated graphics, where the graphics are in the chipset or CPU, and share system RAM.

PC rackmount servers universally have on-board graphics. They used to use PCI-based graphics chips from the late 90s, stuff like the ATI Rage XL (rebadged as a ATI ES1000). Recent servers use specialized graphics chips which present a similar low-end interface (like the Matrox G200), but also integrate stand-alone remote graphics access. They can output their graphics over an H.264 stream, for example. That way, you can access a special IP and control the server all the way from cold boot.
 
No reason for the rack mounted version to have a GPU in it by default.

It is still a workstation, not a server. I think this is more about mounting it alongside video/audio studio equipment than turning it into a server/high-density computing device.

The MP only remotely makes sense if you want/need to run MacOS based applications (which, as well as being GUI driven, often rely on a meaty GPU for acceleration). If you want a headless server or compute farm, more bangs per buck are available with generic PC hardware (which is why the XServe is no more, too).
 
That isn't a stupid question. A lot (maybe most) server motherboards have on-board graphics. On-board graphics is generally CPU dependent. I don't think the Xeon W supports it. Might be wrong, as I haven't used them personally, but a quick review of intel's spec page suggests I am correct.
Who's going to use this as a server, though? Aside from hardcore Mac partisans, I can't think of anyone using it for that purpose. This is ideal for rack-mounted workflows, like video production.
 
Forgive me please, but I’m struggling to see why Apple are charging a thousand dollars extra for a different case? Can anyone enlighten me as to the reason?
 
Screen Shot 2020-01-14 at 12.31.51 PM.png


Is that some kind of filter in front of the fans? The tower version does not have anything in front of the fans?
 
  • Like
Reactions: adib
It is still a workstation, not a server. I think this is more about mounting it alongside video/audio studio equipment than turning it into a server/high-density computing device.

The MP only remotely makes sense if you want/need to run MacOS based applications (which, as well as being GUI driven, often rely on a meaty GPU for acceleration). If you want a headless server or compute farm, more bangs per buck are available with generic PC hardware (which is why the XServe is no more, too).
Or putting it in a road case with all the peripherals and monitor.
 
Forgive me please, but I’m struggling to see why Apple are charging a thousand dollars extra for a different case? Can anyone enlighten me as to the reason?

Business 101: charge what people are willing to pay, not what it costs. This is true for any business worldwide, other than utilities.
 
Glad they’re offering this in a variety of flavors and customizations. They’ve really done well listening to the pro consumers who need this machine.

What some people fail to remember (or acknowledge) is that this machine is absolutely not designed for the average consumer. Unless of course your name is John Siracusa lol.

I literally just laughed hysterically in the middle of a quiet cafe. Thank you for that!
 
  • Like
Reactions: robantonelli
What the?!? Does Apple really expect me to install a 19" equipment rack in my house just in order to use this computer? Who do they think they are?!?

(Sorry, that's about as much fake outrage as I can muster this early in the morning.)

I have 19" rack equipment in my house… in 2 places. Pretty handy if you ask me. My "problem" (don't have a real problem as I'm not who this computer is aimed at) with it isn't that it's rack mount… its the fact that it's an enormous 5U. If it were 3U I could have happily mounted it into the 19" rack mount that's screwed in under my desk.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4sallypat
Xeon chips have no iGPU - last i knew. So it would to have some graphics card.

Such a blanket statement is not entirely accurate.
Keep in mind that the Xeon brand covers even the lowly 4-8 core Xeon E-2x00 which DO have integrated graphics.

But yes, the W and it's bigger brother the Server models are all lacking Integrated Graphics.
[automerge]1579028379[/automerge]
Configure on one machine, and use cabling to just flash that configuration to all the slaves.

"Use Cabling"
What does that even mean?
Does Mac OS have some network based setup out of the box?
Does the Mac Pro have an IPMI Interface they are hiding from the rest of us?
Does Apple even support PXE with Mac OS?

As others have said, there is still the benefit of using the GPUs for Application Acceleration anyway.
I'm sure at some point the Mac Pro will also get VMware Certified, then with the right GPU, you can enable SR-IOV based GPU Slicing and run multiple MacOS VMs with GPU support on a single Mac Pro.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Oculus Mentis
Does Mac OS have some network based setup out of the box?
Does the Mac Pro have an IPMI Interface they are hiding from the rest of us?
Does Apple even support PXE with Mac OS?

Google Netboot and Netinstall. (Supported from Mac OS 8.5 until 10.15)
 
In one way, it's expensive compared to the 1U Xserve G5 which cost $2999 and $3999 before BTO options in 2006-2011. With inflation, that's about $3500 for the base model in today's dollar so this is almost 2X as expensive as the Xserve but the Xserve was far more limited in expandability. you could add hard drives, I think there was one PCI slot and RAM and that's it.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.