Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
You might want to consider Areca RAID controllers over Highpoint at this point because some people report that 10.5.6 breaks some Highpoint cards. Same thing with Areca but they fixed it.

The RocketRAID 35xx and 4xxx series use the same EFI v1.3 update. And the 35xx apparently doesn't work under OSX 10.5.6 + EFI v1.3. AMUG lists it in one of their cons. The EFI v1.3 was released in October 2008 (I think) before 10.5.6 in December 2008...beckons why Highpoint haven't updated the EFI?

FYI
 
Well, it seems like this is ever the tough decision. Internal RAID allows for a lot of the performance and space requirements I need, and while I am at my computer daily, if RAID 5+HS/6 don't provide enough fault tolerance for considering this also a good enough backup solution I'm going to have to think about this. And I say that knowing that RAID isn't a backup but if sufficient redundancy is built in with careful system administration then you can have confidence no?
In theory, you'd think so, but in reality, No. No RAID system is ideal. Despite all the planning, things can, and do go wrong. Not just drive failures, but the cards can die, but more importantly, there's things outside of the card manufacturers control.

Primarily resulting from system firmware and OS updates. Either of these can instantly kill an array, or make it completely useless. :eek: :(

It's reasons such as these, you really NEED a backup system. If only for the data. (It can allow you to use a simple, inexpensive backup. Less capacity/fewer drives, perhaps even a single disk could suffice).
Since you have a LOT more experience here. If you were setting this up with wanting performance and the safety of your data how would you do this with six 1 Tb drives, the internal card I have, and a need for backup considering I already have about 1.5 Terabytes of data that will need to go ON to the array?

I have thought of a few options:

Options with my current Rocket Raid Card 4320 (8 internal drives supported)
1.) 6 disc (1 Tb Ea), RAID 6 = 4 Tb, 2 drives failure tolerance
2.) 6 disc (1 Tb Ea), RAID 5 + HS = 4 Tb, 1 drive failure with auto rebuild
3.) 6 disc (1 Tb Ea), RAID 50 = 4 Tb, 2-3 drive failures?
4.) 4 disc (1 Tb Ea), RAID 5 (no HS) = 3 Tb as system disc on one channel of the RAID card backed up by 2 disc (1.5 Tb Ea), RAID 0 = 3 Tb on 2nd 4 port channel but the fact that it is RAID 0 wouldn't matter too much since it would just be a backup.
5.) 6 disc (1 Tb Ea), RAID 10 = 3 Tb, 3 drive failure (seems unlikely) GOOD ENOUGH? 3 Tb would definitely suffice for me.
Your best option would be #5. RAID 10 elliminates the "write hole" issue associated with both RAID 5&6 alltogether. The cost of course, is capacity, and some performance. But it's the safest, given your restraints IMO.

Personally, I still wouldn't rely on RAID 0, even as a backup, though I've seen it done. I still think a separate, single external drive would suffice until you're capable of implementing some other means, as mentioned previously by myself or rylin. Remember, backups are primarily meant for security in a worst case scenario. ;) You might have a lot of work to do, but at least the data is safe. Data recovery IS NOT CHEAP. ~$2k+ USD per drive isn't extreme if you ever had to go this route. :eek:
I definitely see the need for an external backup but if I move a bunch of things external then I lose the benefits of the performance increases for the OS and would have to replace my 4320 card. Damn this is confusing, thanks for the patience, and I would really welcome configuration suggestions. :)
Not really. It will depend on what you use, but there's plenty of options. I just plan for this when planning for the RAID, and tend to buy a card with 2x the ports needed for the primary array. Then make a duplicate, and use as a true backup, not a mirror.

But the suggestions of iSCSI, AoE, NAS,... can be quite speedy, if you need to make a full backup, rather than an incremental. As rylin suggested, "bonding"/"teaming" of Ethernet ports can really speed things up.

Also happens to be the most convienient way to handle data throughput on a system with limited slots. ;) :D

The RR3520 (IOP341) and RR4320 (IOP348) have a more powerful processor than the CalDigit (IOP333). That means CalDigit is limited to 500MB/s while both RocketRAIDs have tested over 1000MB/s in our lab.

Are you doing internal drives? There are also versions of the RocketRAID that have external mini-SAS ports that can connect to enclosures with either SAS or SATA drives (RR3522 and RR4322).

I found that the RocketRAID cards are happiest with either Seagate or Hitachi drives (both SAS and SATA).
Hi Rob-Art. :D

Good to hear from you on this. I hadn't even attempted to mention the IOP's, as he's already purchased the Highpoint 4320. ;) Another MiniSAS port for a backup array would be nice, but sadly, it doesn't exist. :(

The OP's using an '08 MP (2x 2.8GHz), and is looking to go internal, with 6 drives.
You might want to consider Areca RAID controllers over Highpoint at this point because some people report that 10.5.6 breaks some Highpoint cards. Same thing with Areca but they fixed it.

The RocketRAID 35xx and 4xxx series use the same EFI v1.3 update. And the 35xx apparently doesn't work under OSX 10.5.6 + EFI v1.3. AMUG lists it in one of their cons. The EFI v1.3 was released in October 2008 (I think) before 10.5.6 in December 2008...beckons why Highpoint haven't updated the EFI?

FYI
Definitely worth considering, but the OP's already purchased the Highpoint 4320. Now if he's willing to return/exchange it, it could help him out, and not just for the reasons you mention. Happens to be a good explaination of some of the reasoning for a good backup system in the first place. :)

I'm glad you've picked up on this BTW. ;) :D

It would give him another MiniSAS port on the card to build an external 4 drive array for backup purposes. Rather easy, and inexpensive way to do it, IMO. ;)
 
Thanks Nanofrog.

Thanks Nanofrog, I was looking to raid with a caldigit or rocketraid 4322 on the 2008 Mac Pro's but decided to wait for the 2009s. Waited, Just purchased and was looking for more info on them and stumbled onto your post about the unsuable 3rd party's in them! You just saved me al lot of frustration!:D. I still don't know what I'm going to do, I don't really want to go external.....:(
 
At this point, AoE or iSCSI are terrific options -- disk traffic over the network. Pretty much everyone would get a few hundred megabit per second straight off (100Mbps = 12.5MB/sec). iSCSI would have a well-known limit around 700-800Mbps, and AoE should be able to go a bit higher.

That's the low-cost option.

Yeah I've been seriously looking into this now as a good solution to backing up whatever array I settle on though this is now in the air again because....

You might want to consider Areca RAID controllers over Highpoint at this point because some people report that 10.5.6 breaks some Highpoint cards. Same thing with Areca but they fixed it.

The RocketRAID 35xx and 4xxx series use the same EFI v1.3 update. And the 35xx apparently doesn't work under OSX 10.5.6 + EFI v1.3. AMUG lists it in one of their cons. The EFI v1.3 was released in October 2008 (I think) before 10.5.6 in December 2008...beckons why Highpoint haven't updated the EFI?

FYI

I had read this but thought that Highpoint had fixed the problem but I guess I was wrong. This is however a concern I guess that brings me back to one reason having the OS on a separate disk might not be such a bad idea. It would suck if every update to Mac OS X of either a Highpoint or Areca card made the array unusable. That said, I was eying the Areca ARC-1680ix-8/12 but the $680 price tag wasn't enough to win me over the Rocketraid 4320 I did find for $350. But, now that it seems like having a secondary array is a still in the works I'm not opposed to returning my Rocketraid card (which arrives tomorrow) - especially if it is DOA in terms of being usable from this EFI problem.

The RR3520 (IOP341) and RR4320 (IOP348) have a more powerful processor than the CalDigit (IOP333). That means CalDigit is limited to 500MB/s while both RocketRAIDs have tested over 1000MB/s in our lab.

Yeah I had seen this difference pointed out on a few websites and was a major part of not going with CalDigit. That and their proprietary external cases.

Are you doing internal drives? There are also versions of the RocketRAID that have external mini-SAS ports that can connect to enclosures with either SAS or SATA drives (RR3522 and RR4322).

I found that the RocketRAID cards are happiest with either Seagate or Hitachi drives (both SAS and SATA).

Well that's the plan thus far :) but as you can see things are clearly still in flux!!!! :D ;)

In theory, you'd think so, but in reality, No. No RAID system is ideal. Despite all the planning, things can, and do go wrong. Not just drive failures, but the cards can die, but more importantly, there's things outside of the card manufacturers control.

Primarily resulting from system firmware and OS updates. Either of these can instantly kill an array, or make it completely useless. :eek: :(

It's reasons such as these, you really NEED a backup system. If only for the data. (It can allow you to use a simple, inexpensive backup. Less capacity/fewer drives, perhaps even a single disk could suffice).

Yeah, definitely see that now and again it just makes me think having the OS on the array maybe bad if ever OS update has a chance of toasting it / making it unusable. With a satisfactory backup solution and the OS on a regular drive not IN the array at least if the raid card becomes inoperable you could continue to be productive as your data still exists on the external backup (Nas, qnap, etc) as many of you have suggested.

Your best option would be #5. RAID 10 elliminates the "write hole" issue associated with both RAID 5&6 alltogether. The cost of course, is capacity, and some performance. But it's the safest, given your restraints IMO.

Personally, I still wouldn't rely on RAID 0, even as a backup, though I've seen it done. I still think a separate, single external drive would suffice until you're capable of implementing some other means, as mentioned previously by myself or rylin. Remember, backups are primarily meant for security in a worst case scenario. ;) You might have a lot of work to do, but at least the data is safe. Data recovery IS NOT CHEAP. ~$2k+ USD per drive isn't extreme if you ever had to go this route. :eek:

Yeah I'm also looking at a single Big Lacie type disc that could fill this role. And yes, I am MORE than aware of the cost of recovering a single 2.5 drive as I mentioned earlier! I can only guess what a 6 disc RAID array would cost!!!! I never want to have to find out.

Not really. It will depend on what you use, but there's plenty of options. I just plan for this when planning for the RAID, and tend to buy a card with 2x the ports needed for the primary array. Then make a duplicate, and use as a true backup, not a mirror.

Good to hear from you on this. I hadn't even attempted to mention the IOP's, as he's already purchased the Highpoint 4320. ;) Another MiniSAS port for a backup array would be nice, but sadly, it doesn't exist. :

Definitely worth considering, but the OP's already purchased the Highpoint 4320. Now if he's willing to return/exchange it, it could help him out, and not just for the reasons you mention. Happens to be a good explaination of some of the reasoning for a good backup system in the first place. :)

It would give him another MiniSAS port on the card to build an external 4 drive array for backup purposes. Rather easy, and inexpensive way to do it, IMO. ;)
(

Yeah, I'm not at all opposed to returning the card that I purchased and these recent posts make me think that maybe one of the Areca ARC-1680ix-8/12 cards would be better as I could get both internal and external ports and then have the ability to back that all up.

Well again, can't tell you all how helpful this continues to be. I seriously appreciate all the help thus far! Better safe then sorry!!!! :D
 
Thanks Nanofrog, I was looking to raid with a caldigit or rocketraid 4322 on the 2008 Mac Pro's but decided to wait for the 2009s. Waited, Just purchased and was looking for more info on them and stumbled onto your post about the unsuable 3rd party's in them! You just saved me al lot of frustration!:D. I still don't know what I'm going to do, I don't really want to go external.....:(
On the '09 models, the only way to use 3rd party is external. No other way ATM. Perhaps one of the vendors would be successful at using the ports soldered directly, but I doubt it, as Apple wouldn't share the necessary information, and they could likely find themselves embroiled in an IP (Intellectual Property , i.e. Patent) legal suit. :(

The next best possiblility, would be go straight to iSCSI, AoE, NAS,... based solutions. Depending on specifics, speed can vary, but usually is decent, and still external. Can be an inexpensive way to go though.

No idea of you're needs though, and it may not be the best solution for you.

That leaves Apple's RAID card. Ewww... :p
I had read this but thought that Highpoint had fixed the problem but I guess I was wrong. This is however a concern I guess that brings me back to one reason having the OS on a separate disk might not be such a bad idea. It would suck if every update to Mac OS X of either a Highpoint or Areca card made the array unusable. That said, I was eying the Areca ARC-1680ix-8/12 but the $680 price tag wasn't enough to win me over the Rocketraid 4320 I did find for $350. But, now that it seems like having a secondary array is a still in the works I'm not opposed to returning my Rocketraid card (which arrives tomorrow) - especially if it is DOA in terms of being usable from this EFI problem.
Sad too, as Areca makes them for Highpoint. :eek: It's likely due to the changes made to meet budget requirements. :(
Yeah, definitely see that now and again it just makes me think having the OS on the array maybe bad if ever OS update has a chance of toasting it / making it unusable. With a satisfactory backup solution and the OS on a regular drive not IN the array at least if the raid card becomes inoperable you could continue to be productive as your data still exists on the external backup (Nas, qnap, etc) as many of you have suggested.
Even with the OS on a separate drive, you'd still loose access to the array. Not much different, really, except it can be easier to undo the update. Saves time perhaps, but not much else. That said, you're time may be limited (has a financial value), particularly if you use the system to earn a living.

Yeah I'm also looking at a single Big Lacie type disc that could fill this role. And yes, I am MORE than aware of the cost of recovering a single 2.5 drive as I mentioned earlier! I can only guess what a 6 disc RAID array would cost!!!! I never want to have to find out.
RAID recovery is worse, as there's more to it. Figure ~$18k or even $20k (on the outside) for 6 drives! :eek: That could be a modest new car. :p

Yeah, I'm not at all opposed to returning the card that I purchased and these recent posts make me think that maybe one of the Areca ARC-1680ix-8/12 cards would be better as I could get both internal and external ports and then have the ability to back that all up.
You could go with a couple of Areca's.

One would be say the ARC-1680ix12. (SAS based, as I assume you know). Pickey with SATA drives, and you'd have to use either the Seagate ES.2 or WD RE2's enterprise drives. (RE3's aren't certified on it yet. I tried them earlier, and they didn't work. Perhaps the new firmware revision will change this. Areca's passed them for the SATA controllers, but is still testing on the SAS models. If you can be patient, it may be an option if you choose one of these). Overall, it's a really good card. If you choose to upgrade to SAS drives at a later time, you're covered. Extremely fast with them as well. (Fujitsu MBA3300RC). You can boot OS X from it if you wish, and upgrade the cache, giving a nice performance boost for esentially peanuts. DDR2-533 ECC is cheap. You should be able to easily locate a 2GB DIMM for $20 - 25USD. The downside, it the pickyness of SATA drives, and it isn't the fastest performer in thier line with SATA drives. But no slouch, by any means. :p

Their speed king with SATA, is the other card I wanted to bring to your attention. The ARC-1231ML. It uses a slightly older IOP, but it actually outperforms the ARC-1680 Series with SATA drives. :eek: It can also be upgraded in terms of the cache (same type used, so still quite inexpensive).

It's downside per se, is YOU CANNOT BOOT OS X. Windows and Linux boot just fine. But as you seem to be interested in running the OS on a separate drive, this won't matter. ;)

Areca also seems to do quite well with keeping up with Apple's update changes. If it breaks the card, they'll have a fix out rather quickly. So far, it's not a matter of being "broken", but having to reboot in order to return array availablility. Not that big a deal, as you aren't totally dead, but it may scare you the first time.

Sorry to add to any confusion, but it seems like it could help you in the long run. Run the numbers on the Areca cards, cables, and enclosures. Then compare it to an iSCSI, AoE,... route.

Keep in mind, even Areca's 8 port internal cards will be higher than the Highpoint. But you get additional features. The Partition Table backup feature alone is worth it IMO. The upgradeable cache is certainly extremely nice as well (depending on model). :)
 
Damn, now the dilemma is worse! My rocketraid 4320 just showed up and the desire to unpackage it and put it in my MP is strong!!! Must....resist....still debating if I need an areca! GAH!

EDIT: Just talked to Highpoint on the phone and apparently there is no issue that they know of with 10.5.6 and they don't anticipate any issues. For whatever that is worth.
 
How does doing a simple Apple software raid - stripping across the internals - compare with all the tech in this thread? I'm doing HD video editing in FCP, but none of the clips are uncompressed. Using ProRess422 and it looks beautiful.

With this setup you just backup the internals to externals.
 
How does doing a simple Apple software raid - stripping across the internals - compare with all the tech in this thread? I'm doing HD video editing in FCP, but none of the clips are uncompressed. Using ProRess422 and it looks beautiful.

With this setup you just backup the internals to externals.
RAID 0 doesn't offer any redundancy at all, and a failure destroys the data. It offers a cheap performance boost only. As it's software based, the calculation load is placed on system resources. For some uses, this may not matter at all, but for CPU intensive applications, this can slow the system. Clock cycles that could have been used by the application, are needed to perform the RAID calculations instead.

Hardware implementations eliminates this, and provide RAID types that the software utility in OS X can't handle. There's also the possibility of using more than 4 HDD's, it can run faster, and even operate SAS drives (if the card supports it). But you pay for it. :eek: ;) Cost will ultimately depend on the number of ports, OS's supported, including boot capabilities, IOP processor speed,...
 
On the '09 models, the only way to use 3rd party is external. No other way ATM. Perhaps one of the vendors would be successful at using the ports soldered directly, but I doubt it, as Apple wouldn't share the necessary information, and they could likely find themselves embroiled in an IP (Intellectual Property , i.e. Patent) legal suit. :(

The next best possiblility, would be go straight to iSCSI, AoE, NAS,... based solutions. Depending on specifics, speed can vary, but usually is decent, and still external. Can be an inexpensive way to go though.

No idea of you're needs though, and it may not be the best solution for you.

That leaves Apple's RAID card. Ewww... :p

Nano, I have a couple questions. I want to put 2 HD's in the second optical drive. But I am not sure how this will work in the 2009 Mac Pro (Its a shame, I spent countless hours researching all of this before hand for the past 3 months and now that the new Pro's are out, the change in so many things has brought me back to square one :() I was going to go with one of these:

Pro Caddy 2:
http://www.transintl.com/store/category.cfm?Category=2761

Maxconnect:
http://www.maxupgrades.com/istore/index.cfm?fuseaction=product.display&product_id=158

But as the system has changed I am not sure if the there are still two SATA connectors on the motherboard to achieve this. I emailed both of the company's about the compatibility of the items and they said they were still doing tests and awaiting their machines to arrive and to give them some time.

If I were to get the Mac Raid Card and say screw the array working in Bootcamp, would I be able to boot from the drives themselves being in that optical slot (if this is possible?)

Ugh, this is all so frustrating. Maybe I should just go buy a Drobo and be done with it. Lol. Thanks a bunch Nano.
 
Nano, I have a couple questions. I want to put 2 HD's in the second optical drive. But I am not sure how this will work in the 2009 Mac Pro (Its a shame, I spent countless hours researching all of this before hand for the past 3 months and now that the new Pro's are out, the change in so many things has brought me back to square one :() I was going to go with one of these:

Pro Caddy 2:
http://www.transintl.com/store/category.cfm?Category=2761

Maxconnect:
http://www.maxupgrades.com/istore/index.cfm?fuseaction=product.display&product_id=158

But as the system has changed I am not sure if the there are still two SATA connectors on the motherboard to achieve this. I emailed both of the company's about the compatibility of the items and they said they were still doing tests and awaiting their machines to arrive and to give them some time.

If I were to get the Mac Raid Card and say screw the array working in Bootcamp, would I be able to boot from the drives themselves being in that optical slot (if this is possible?)

Ugh, this is all so frustrating. Maybe I should just go buy a Drobo and be done with it. Lol. Thanks a bunch Nano.
I'd wait for MaxConnect and Trans international to verify their devices work in the new models, but I'd think they could. Might require a little modification though, resulting in a new version. :confused:
I would have thought the optical bay bracket would have remained unchanged. Apparently not, as I would think the 3rd party mount vendors would have verified functionality with you if it were. :(

The '09 model essentially uses the ODD_SATA ports for the ODD's now, and has eliminated the IDE interface as I understand it. So the two "extra" ports are no longer, as they must be used for the ODD(s). You'd only have ONE available to you at best.

Obviously, this is a problem for you.

You'd have to find a SATA card with internal ports that work in the '09 model. There seems to be some issues with cards that worked previously (posts in other threads), so it would require some research, and possibly waiting for one to surface. :( (Not sure on a specific model actually available ATM).

Another possibility, would be to remove the Optical drive, and place it in an external enclosure. (Cost perhaps on par with a SATA card, but lower than external solutions).

Beyond that, you're left with an external solution. It does offer more possibilities, but is more of a pain, and external will cost you more than the internal configurations possible in the '06 - '08 models.

It seems Apple dealt a harsh blow with using 3rd party RAID systems that aren't external. :eek: :rolleyes: :apple:
 
Ok, I think I finally have a solution to all of these issues that is cost effective and will suit my needs just fine after all of the posts that have come up onto this thread.

I am planning on Keeping my RocketRAID 4320 (since it is fast, was on sale for $350 bucks, and since highpoint verifies it as working). I am then going to pick up a Velociraptor drive for my system disk and connect 5, 1 terabyte drives to the RocketRAID card in RAID 6 to give me 3 terabytes of space, and then I'll move my home directory to the array.

I figure that this way all of my data files (which can be big) will get the performance boost of being on the Array, my OS will be on a Velociraptor as opposed to on a Barracuda, and I will back up my system disc and critical home files to a 1.5 terabyte external drive. I'll pray (for the short term) that the other data on the array will be ok until I can afford a NAS (but it is that way now anyway).

I'd love to have the Areca ARC-1680ix-8 or 12 but the price tag is QUITE high

Then I figure if I ever need to expand the array, or if I want to move to an external solution I could get one of these and pull the internal ports to the exterior?

Does this logic seem good?
 
Ok, I think I finally have a solution to all of these issues that is cost effective and will suit my needs just fine after all of the posts that have come up onto this thread.

I am planning on Keeping my RocketRAID 4320 (since it is fast, was on sale for $350 bucks, and since highpoint verifies it as working). I am then going to pick up a Velociraptor drive for my system disk and connect 5, 1 terabyte drives to the RocketRAID card in RAID 6 to give me 3 terabytes of space, and then I'll move my home directory to the array.

I figure that this way all of my data files (which can be big) will get the performance boost of being on the Array, my OS will be on a Velociraptor as opposed to on a Barracuda, and I will back up my system disc and critical home files to a 1.5 terabyte external drive. I'll pray (for the short term) that the other data on the array will be ok until I can afford a NAS (but it is that way now anyway).

I'd love to have the Areca ARC-1680ix-8 or 12 but the price tag is QUITE high

Then I figure if I ever need to expand the array, or if I want to move to an external solution I could get one of these and pull the internal ports to the exterior?

Does this logic seem good?
I understand you're situation, and I hope the "implement and pray" :eek: :p method of RAID 6 and no backups holds for until you can get a backup system in place. :)

Just don't let it go too long, as it's easy to be lulled into a false sense of security. (IMO, THE biggest danger in this situation).

As per the device you linked, it WON'T WORK. They're too unstable with SATA drives (drop outs). You'd need to use a special cable that goes directly from the card's internal port to the enclosure.

SFF-8087 (internal MiniSAS) to either an SFF-8088 (external MiniSAS) or SFF-8470 (MulitLane) to the enclosure. (Enclosure end depends on the unit you select).

Here's the first type (external MiniSAS end), and this is the MulitLane version. Same price, so you don't need to feel limited by the cable. :) You should also note, that with SATA drives, the TOTAL cable limit is 2.0m. (Internal + external + internal [enclosure]).
 
I understand you're situation, and I hope the "implement and pray" :eek: :p method of RAID 6 and no backups holds for until you can get a backup system in place. :)

Just don't let it go too long, as it's easy to be lulled into a false sense of security. (IMO, THE biggest danger in this situation).

As per the device you linked, it WON'T WORK. They're too unstable with SATA drives (drop outs). You'd need to use a special cable that goes directly from the card's internal port to the enclosure.

SFF-8087 (internal MiniSAS) to either an SFF-8088 (external MiniSAS) or SFF-8470 (MulitLane) to the enclosure. (Enclosure end depends on the unit you select).

Here's the first type (external MiniSAS end), and this is the MulitLane version. Same price, so you don't need to feel limited by the cable. :) You should also note, that with SATA drives, the TOTAL cable limit is 2.0m. (Internal + external + internal [enclosure]).

Yeah I'm crossing my fingers too but I'll work something out soon. Thanks for the links on the cables and I just hope that this EFI update gets fixed now that it is in my MP here. Seems to not want to update to v1.3 (as predicted but tech support said otherwise). Waiting on some dumb update program from them... more on that soon. :mad:

But hey, I see on their website that the 4322 works with the 09 models but it's an external card so I guess that is to be expected. ;)
 
Yeah I'm crossing my fingers too but I'll work something out soon. Thanks for the links on the cables and I just hope that this EFI update gets fixed now that it is in my MP here. Seems to not want to update to v1.3 (as predicted but tech support said otherwise). Waiting on some dumb update program from them... more on that soon. :mad:

But hey, I see on their website that the 4322 works with the 09 models but it's an external card so I guess that is to be expected. ;)
Good luck on the support end. ;) A link to the updater shouldn't be too hard. :p
 
Good luck on the support end. ;) A link to the updater shouldn't be too hard. :p

Haha yeah well the links were fine online, got the new drivers, selected the new EFI update, the updating "passed" and I rebooted. I can honestly say there was no user (followed the instructions to the T) and yeah...online web manager is locking me out. So "engineering" will get back to me...

I'm not impressed yet :( More on that soon! I am thinking maybe that decision may make itself to get the 1680ix-8! :rolleyes: There's no rush here since it's only been a day but let's just hope that this works eventually. The agent made it sound like it was not normal behavior. It begins! Going to be buying that backup solution REALLY quick! I have sadly heard some bad things about Highpoint's customer service - is Areca any better?
 
Haha yeah well the links were fine online, got the new drivers, selected the new EFI update, the updating "passed" and I rebooted. I can honestly say there was no user (followed the instructions to the T) and yeah...online web manager is locking me out. So "engineering" will get back to me...

I'm not impressed yet :( More on that soon! I am thinking maybe that decision may make itself to get the 1680ix-8! :rolleyes: There's no rush here since it's only been a day but let's just hope that this works eventually. The agent made it sound like it was not normal behavior. It begins! Going to be buying that backup solution REALLY quick! I have sadly heard some bad things about Highpoint's customer service - is Areca any better?
What you're currently experiencing may have been a large part of the "issues" seen with Highpoint.

You shouldn't have any problems with Areca's Support Engineers. My experiences with them have been great. In cases they don't have a fix at that time, they get it worked out quickly.

The only thing that may be a little difficult, is the way the emails are written. (Phone calls to Taiwan...$$$ :eek: :eek:). :p English isn't their first language, so the reply's can be a little difficult to decipher (really tricky stuff). If you end up needing support, you'll figure it out, and it will get easier as you learn more about RAID as well. :)

BTW, here's a SATA card you might want to take a look at. If you decide to DIY a mounting plate (Can you drill some holes? ;)), it can give you a SATA port internally, and another 2x eSATA ports. Handy for individual drives. It can also be used with a Port Multiplier (PM) enclosure for a backup solution.
 
What you're currently experiencing may have been a large part of the "issues" seen with Highpoint.

...enter my fear that this is true. :eek:

You shouldn't have any problems with Areca's Support Engineers. My experiences with them have been great. In cases they don't have a fix at that time, they get it worked out quickly.

The only thing that may be a little difficult, is the way the emails are written. (Phone calls to Taiwan...$$$ :eek: :eek:). :p English isn't their first language, so the reply's can be a little difficult to decipher (really tricky stuff). If you end up needing support, you'll figure it out, and it will get easier as you learn more about RAID as well. :)

That is good to know, hoping that this is just some minor deal and highpoint gets on it quickly but I guess I'll be finding out here very soon.


BTW, here's a SATA card you might want to take a look at. If you decide to DIY a mounting plate (Can you drill some holes? ;)), it can give you a SATA port internally, and another 2x eSATA ports. Handy for individual drives. It can also be used with a Port Multiplier (PM) enclosure for a backup solution.

Nice! I have already begun the process of fabricating an enclosure for the bay in our machine shop.
 
Which enclosure?
A drive mount for the optical bay? :confused:

Yeah sorry, I have access to a huge machine shop here and so I started drafting up a way to make my own "pro caddy 2" to fit two more 3.5 inch drives in there. It seemed ridiculous to pay $90+ dollars for a few hunks of metal online. So with sheets of all kinds of scrap metal, welders, etc around I'm gonna try a DIY solution to get the extra drives in there myself.
 
Yeah sorry, I have access to a huge machine shop here and so I started drafting up a way to make my own "pro caddy 2" to fit two more 3.5 inch drives in there. It seemed ridiculous to pay $90+ dollars for a few hunks of metal online. So with sheets of all kinds of scrap metal, welders, etc around I'm gonna try a DIY solution to get the extra drives in there myself.
:cool:

I even think you can find enough room for 2x 3.5" & a 2.5" Velociraptor (removed from the aluminum mount).

A small sheet or two of thin metal would likely suffice. PCB material (etched completely clean of copper) would work as well, particularly if you need to make sure it's non conductive. ;)

You may be able to make something like the X-Swing product as well, if you can't fit but the 3.5" drives in the optical bay.

I'm jealous of the machine shop access BTW. :eek: I'm liable to go overboard if I did though...:D :p
 
:cool:

I even think you can find enough room for 2x 3.5" & a 2.5" Velociraptor (removed from the aluminum mount).

Yeah this is something that I was thinking about for most of the day actually because it looks like you could make two 3.5s and a 2.5 if hung from the top as opposed to resting on the bottom.

You may be able to make something like the X-Swing product as well, if you can't fit but the 3.5" drives in the optical bay.

It would allow you, particularly using the SATA card linked previously, to have 6 drives in the array + an OS drive if you wish. :D

I'm jealous of the machine shop access BTW. :eek: I'm liable to go overboard if I did though...:D :p

So on the 2008 though is it necessary to use that sata card if you run the velociraptor off of one of the two sata controllers on the logic board? Then the other 6 drives just get hooked to the internal RAID card .... and of course backed up. I do have an eSATA card in there now with 2 external ports (no internal though).
 
Yeah this is something that I was thinking about for most of the day actually because it looks like you could make two 3.5s and a 2.5 if hung from the top as opposed to resting on the bottom.
I can't help but think it's possible. :D
So on the 2008 though is it necessary to use that sata card if you run the velociraptor off of one of the two sata controllers on the logic board? Then the other 6 drives just get hooked to the internal RAID card .... and of course backed up. I do have an eSATA card in there now with 2 external ports (no internal though).
On the '08, No. Sorry about that. :eek: I managed to get my "wires" crossed, and was thinking about another person with an '09 model.

In you're case, just use two of the Fan out cables. One from the logic board to the Velociraptor as a boot drive. The second connects from the two 3.5" HDD's in the ODD bay, and run it to the RAID card. Connect the original logic board's MiniSAS cable to the RAID card. That would give you 6 HDD's for the array.

Using the MiniSAS port on the logic board just makes it easier to ensure boot, and you'll have the cable with the ARC-1231ML (assuming you do plan to exchange the RocketRAID for it). ;)

The other connectors can be routed out the back for eSATA if you wish. Hot Swap capability may not be supported under OS X IIRC, but would be using AHCI drivers and Windows.
 
I decided to go with the Drobo. WD just released 1.5TB Caviar Greens too, for only 159.00 ;). That will tie me over until things are sorted out and 3rd party providers update their current line ups.

The raid headache is just not worth it right now.
 
Hi,

I will order my 2009 Mac Pro this week and was wondering to order the RAID card with it or not. If I am only doing RAID-0 or RAID-10, will the card give me any performance gains over Mac OS X's software RAID?

I am getting different anwers for this so I figured I'd ask in this thread as you guys seem to really know what you are talking about.

Thanks, and sorry for hijacking the thread.
 
Hi,

I will order my 2009 Mac Pro this week and was wondering to order the RAID card with it or not. If I am only doing RAID-0 or RAID-10, will the card give me any performance gains over Mac OS X's software RAID?

I am getting different anwers for this so I figured I'd ask in this thread as you guys seem to really know what you are talking about.

Thanks, and sorry for hijacking the thread.
The I/O processing for a 4 drive array (max), is minimal for RAID0. A little higher for RAID 10, but probably not enough to require the Apple RAID card.

The card can give a slight performance boost though, by the built-in cache, and it's own IOP processor. Again, perhaps not enough to justify. Unless you want to use a RAID type that OS X does not support, such as 5 or 6.

I'd recommend basing your decision based on primary system usage. If you're using it for graphics/video editing, and are constantly loading all of the cores, it might be worth it just to eliminate the extra load placed on them (RAID IOP). If that's not the case however, I wouldn't bother.

And in the case you could really use a RAID card, you might want to consider 3rd party alternatives, despite the difficulties in the '09 MP. It can allow you more drives, additional array types, and faster throughput. Other features are also handy, as they make recovery easier.

Sorry if it seems convoluted, but I've no idea of how you'll use your system.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.