The credit card companies don't care about stopping thieves. I'm betting they do the cost analysis and decide it's too expensive to go after them and it's cheaper just to let them get money.
I can confirm that you are, sadly, correct.
The credit card companies don't care about stopping thieves. I'm betting they do the cost analysis and decide it's too expensive to go after them and it's cheaper just to let them get money.
So now we're back down to 2.
What neg ratings are you talking about?Yep, 2 neg ratings for that. LOL
I love your neg ratings guys.
What on earth are you talking about? And who are you talking to?I feed off your tears, sense of entitlement, and utter frustration that OS X somehow, miraculously, after nearly a decade, still has fewer threats against it than you've got fingers on your one hand (yeah, the one you type with on your $400 hackintosh.) The nerd-rage against Apple is beautiful. Keep em coming.
There are a handful of threats, all trojans, not zero. I don't know where you're getting your information, but it's wrong.Yeah, it really sucks that there are like no threats for OS X. Gotta be a negative.
Thank god Vladimir Poutine was infected unless this would have never happened
Yep, 2 neg ratings for that. LOL
I love your neg ratings guys. I feed off your tears, sense of entitlement, and utter frustration that OS X somehow, miraculously, after nearly a decade, still has fewer threats against it than you've got fingers on your one hand (yeah, the one you type with on your $400 hackintosh.) The nerd-rage against Apple is beautiful. Keep em coming.
Yeah, it really sucks that there are like no threats for OS X. Gotta be a negative.
THROW AWAY THE KEY... or shoot them.
This is good news. MacDefender got my Dad. He, like many Mac users infected with the malware, is one of those people that clicks "okay" to anything just to get the windows to go away.
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile/9A5274d)
Maybe I'm being too harsh, but anyone that falls for the old "YOU HAVE VIRUSES!!! Give us your credit card number and we'll get rid of them!" trick deserves what they get.
If true and if they are guilty I hope the russian Justice system and the russian jails live up to their image.
Again, if they are guilty I hope they rot in a jail in northern siberia for the next 25 years...
It was the Romanian secret police, and poison administered by a small pellet from an umbrella tip to kill a dissident. Presumably they used KGB technology.Yep, nowhere near as bad as the Russian virus the KGB administered from the top of a brolly!
It can still be distributed by affiliates, but without the credit card processing, they won't get paid. No doubt numerous websites have been hacked to serve up various fake AVs via cross-site scripting etc, and might be active some time after the network is taken down, assuming they use hacked servers to serve up content.I'm pretty sure I've seen a popup asking me to install the MacDefender malware very recently which would be well after the supposed date this was taken down.
Increasingly, they don't even ask for a pin or signature for relatively small amounts; and they are pushing for even more "convenient" methods using near-field communication to put in phones. Lose your phone, you not only lose your personal info to steal your ID to rake up debt, you can lose all the money from your own account too. Great.In my experience, banks/credit card companies don't give one ***** about theft. They make more money by worrying about getting you to spend more (which also involves not hassling anyone who is using the card. It's why they want you to sign for charges rather than enter a pin. Entering a pin might cause some people not to use the card cause it's too inconvenient though entering a pin is far more secure than just putting a signature down).
Then, one day, MacDefender simply disappeared.
ChronoPay's offices are raided June 23.
To the general public anything bad that gets on your computer is a virus. You can argue semantics and terminology all you want but almost everybody will call it a virus no matter what. It doesn't matter to John Doe if he installed it himself by entering his password, he will blame the computer. The term has made it into the lexicon of the massess. You can't change it.
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile/9A5274d)
Maybe I'm being too harsh, but anyone that falls for the old "YOU HAVE VIRUSES!!! Give us your credit card number and we'll get rid of them!" trick deserves what they get.
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile/9A5274d)
Maybe I'm being too harsh, but anyone that falls for the old "YOU HAVE VIRUSES!!! Give us your credit card number and we'll get rid of them!" trick deserves what they get.
It's very important when it comes to defending against them.
Wrong.
Right.
Defending against a trojan is always going to be a reactionary measure. Unless you prevent installation of software on the machine from Web downloads or from nefarious media (Mac App Store?) you can only stop a trojan after it has struck at least one user. Essentially, a trojan can be written for your system no matter how secure it is.
However, a virus exploits known security flaws in your system and typically replicates itself and tries to move on to other machines as well. The maker of the operating system is directly responsible for letting the virus on to the computer.
Are Macs virus free because Apple writes better software? Certainly the exploit used for JailBreakMe.com could have been used for a virus to gain access to the machine. New security measures in Lion like sand-boxing the PDF viewer/parser or the video decoders are going to go a long way to stopping exploits like that.
But the only security measure that Mac OS X can add to stop a Trojan is to require all application installations to go through the Mac App Store unless you go through some sort of questionnaire that first verifies that you are in fact savvy enough to know what it is you are installing.
It's not about arguing semantics. The difference is important to those who "just don't want something to be there" whether they know it or not, because the difference affects their course of action in defending themselves.Who said otherwise? I didn't. Arguing whether it's a trojan or a virus is completely pointless. The differences aren't important to people who just don't want something to be there.
No, they don't. Most of the people who want to be protected from malware don't know the differences at all. They would benefit by understanding the difference, knowing what course of action is required to protect themselves. That's why education is important. People come here, looking for answers. Rather than accept the fact that people are uninformed, it's far more constructive and helpful to inform them.The people who care about the differences know the differences.
If this is the worst "threat" Mac users see then I find that pretty funny . I mean it doesn't do anything. Well, other than some small pop ups and asks for your credit card? Really? That is considered a "major threat..."
Unless it slows down or crashes your computer (ahem Windows Super Antivirus 2009 (10, 11, etc) then its just annoying. Nice that its gone though
You seriously don't know about the rating system? Look at the bottom of every post. Unless you only visit via phone...What neg ratings are you talking about?
What on earth are you talking about? And who are you talking to?
There are a handful of threats, all trojans, not zero. I don't know where you're getting your information, but it's wrong.
Oh, THOSE ratings! Who cares about those? They're meaningless.You seriously don't know about the rating system? Look at the bottom of every post. Unless you only visit via phone...