What is misleading and inaccurate is to try to make us believe that all customer experiences can be put in the same bag
No one is claiming that "all customer experiences can be put in the same bag".
... and claim that Apple has great customer service based on the fact that, according to you and your sources, Apple ranks high in customer support.
They're not "my sources", they're independent sources. And Apple ranks high because, overall, their customer service is good in the majority of cases. You seem to think that if 1% or 5% or 15% of customers have a bad experience that Apple customer service sucks, overall. That's simply not the case. It has already been acknowledged that
every company has successes and failures in providing customer service. Where the ranking comes is by taking an average, not simply focusing on a small group of disgruntled customers or a small group who have never had problems.
You clearly cannot compare someone who calls in for a minor problem, which can quickly and easily resolved by Apple, and someone who calls customer service for a more serious problem and gets the poor customer service, several of us (including the OP of this thread) talk about.
Your entire argument about serious vs minor problems is based on the erroneous assumption that, for purposes of ranking customer service departments, they only consider minor problems. That is simply untrue. ALL customer service issues are weighed, including major and minor issues, as well as positive and negative outcomes. The independent groups that provide these rankings have no bias toward any company and their credibility would be destroyed if they skewed the data toward any company's favor or disfavor.
Your trying to hide big red bricks with many small grains of sand is indeed misleading.
What's misleading is you trying to make it sound like such ranking surveys only show minor issues and ignore more serious ones. That's completely false and you have no facts on which to base such an assumption.
One should really rank customer satisfaction according to the way manufacturers deal with serious issues first, because that shows the efficiency of their service a lof more accurately than benign problems.
No, they should rank them the way they do, considering ALL issues, major and minor. I'm sure there are companies who might do well with major issues but fail miserably in minor ones. The only fair way is to consider all issues. You're simply trying to bias ranking results to accommodate your individual focus, to the exclusion of the millions of other Apple customers.
Clearly, from my experience and that of many others, Apple does not seem to take serious problems seriously.
Again, you're making a blanket statement, based on the experience of a very small percentage. If you search only this forum, you'll find countless stories of how Apple replaced a logic board or an entire computer, how they gave free upgrades, how they replaced computers multiple times, etc. The only thing you can say factually is that you believe that Apple did not take your problems seriously. You simply cannot, with any credibility whatsoever, make the claim that Apple doesn't take serious problems seriously, overall, based on the experience of a relatively miniscule representation of Apple customers.
You're not happy with Apple. We get it. That's easy to tell from the forum name you chose. Based on what you've said, you have every right to feel that Apple failed to live up to your expectations. It's even fair to say you know of several others who have experienced something similar. No one expects you to suddenly be all happy about Apple or its customer service.
Where you cross the line is when you start making statements that Apple service is terrible overall, or Apple service is terrible for all serious issues. That is simply untrue. There are independent surveys conducted by people who have no bias for or against Apple or any other company. Those surveys consistently show Apple customer service surpassing that of other competitors. You can take every negative experience you've had with Apple, along with every one you know about, have read about, have heard about, etc. Add them all together and you still have a micro-fraction of the Apple customers out there.
Your assumptions are akin to me asking 3 of my neighbors if they like pumpkin pie, finding out that they don't, then making the claim that all Americans hate pumpkin pie.
Your argument that you and others have had a bad experience with Apple customer service is valid.
Your claim that
all, or even
most, Apple customers will have a bad experience with Apple customer service, or that they will have a bad experience if they have a serious issue, is blatantly false and misleading, not to mention incredibly naive.