Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Is is t 3.5" or a 2.5" disk? The reason that I ask is that I can't find any 3.5" enclosures around here for anything less than $20.
 
PING...how about an answer? I'm curious. It sounds like you're using 2.5" stuff and if there are less expensive housings for 3.5" drives I think we'd all like to know about them.

Thanks...if you're listening.
 
We can get some cheap 3.5" USB enclosures from a store here for about 8 bucks, but by the looks of them I wouldn't trust them.
 
I got a 2.5" external enclosure for about $8.00 and a Hitachi 2.5" 5400RPM drive. The 3.5" drives cost too much and I felt I'd lost enough on the WD fiasco as is. This inexpensive system is working fine.
 
So what's to become of the WD? Are you still going to use it for anything or is it a paperweight?
 
I forgot all about this post it's been so long.

I use the WD as a secondary (SECONDARY, not PRIMARY) backup drive. It seems to work, it just likes to do its software induced freeze about every half hour.I don't trust it enough to allow it to be used as a primary back up drive. I figure if some disaster strikes and my regular drives and the main backup drive goes bad, which is unlikely, I'll still have this thing.
 
You may find the WD has nothing wrong with it except the timeout problem. Never the less, I don't think I'd trust it either, but you might as well get your money's worth out of it since there's nothing else that can be done.
 
It's actually working. Every time I test it or use it, it just seems to do its 30 second lockup at random. It seems to happen on the average about every 30 minutes. I personally can't correlate the problem to read or write activity.

I don't use it for anything serious. Right now I'll probably use it to put experimental stuff on, like the Yosemite beta (who cares if that locks up???)
 
MacRobert:

If you're even monitoring this thread and attempt to install Yosemite onto that thing, see if it installs itself as a Core Storage volume. I for the life of me can't get Yosemite to install on one of my external drives as Core Storage but this is apparently the default. Maybe it's limited to internal boot drives only.

Thanks.
 
To the OP:

There have been issues here and there with the WD driver software, but that problem you had was a freak. We have several of those units in house and they don't exhibit any of the problems you've described, and they sound like they're about the same age. About the only things I'd complain about are these:

  1. They're sloooooooooow. Their access times seem abnormally slow, probably because of the variable spindle speeds. Then again, it's a backup drive, so I don't think speed is the primary concern.
  2. If you don't install the WD drivers then some of the functions, like the space indicator or the power switch aren't enabled, which is really dumb in my opinion.

WD had some problems with the drivers, I think it was with Mavericks, which would cause the drive to lose backup data. When that happened we reformatted the drives and used them without drivers. We lost some functionality like I described above, but aside from that and their slowness, not one has failed and no one has reported problems. We're going on several years now.

By the way even if you open up the drive, you still should have tried to get WD to replace it. Just explain how and why you did it. Unless there's sign of physical damage like the drive being dropped, I would bet they can still be talked into RMA'ing it for you, but I thinks it's way too late now.
 
By the way even if you open up the drive, you still should have tried to get WD to replace it. Just explain how and why you did it. Unless there's sign of physical damage like the drive being dropped, I would bet they can still be talked into RMA'ing it for you, but I thinks it's way too late now.

They were pretty clear with me - if you open it up, you own it.
 
Hey MacRobert:

I have one of those drives too. Ended up using Scannerz on it too. Why? The stupid I/O cable that came with the system went bad after a few months. That might be excusable if I'd been plugging and unplugging things constantly, but I'm not. I had to replace it. I don't have the weird timeout or sleeps you do though. All in all I'd say the quality of the product is not impressive. On the box it looks like the unit is in a black machined metal case, when you open it up it's just a plastic box and a cheap flimsy one at that. The original cable was as cheap as possible.

I've heard that the newer units have some type of proprietary controller on them that encrypts stuff on the fly and if you take it out of the WD case and try and used it in another unit, like a regular hard drive, it won't work at all. I have no reason to disbelieve that story but I don't know which specific models they're doing it to either.

I need to correct myself on this. I said that the WDs had some type of encryption embedded in thse. Apparently that's only true for a handful of the units and I'm not sure it was even in the MyBook line, but if you see one of these dirt cheap and decide you want to pop the disk out and use it as an internal, check websites to make sure that's a feasible option.
 
A local company had a number of 2TB USB 2.0 WD external My Book external HDs on sale for $79.95, so I bought one because the price was too temping. I thought I'd repartition the drive so I could haVe a part for Snow Leopard, one for ML, and then a few more for TM backups off my main system. I use SL once in a while for some older PPC graphics apps.

In any case, after I put both SL and ML onto the thing I decided to boot off of it. I wasn't expecting Ferrari like performance but I wasn't expecting errors, either. What happens seems to be that the drive just plain locks up once in a while. You'll be in the middle of something and it will just freeze.

I thought the drive was bad so I got out my copy of Scannerz and ran a scan on it. The drive ****looks**** like it's passing with one strange caveat: Randomly, Scannerz picks up a long irregularity, and it's ALWAYS, not sometimes, ALWAYS 30.5 sec +/- 0.15 seconds. I couldn't make sense of the problem. I contacted SCSC (who makes Scannerz) and they had me send them the log file for the test. They said they're going to try and get a unit like mine to replicate the problem, but indicated that it looked to them like the drive was either falling asleep or parking its heads....right in the middle of use.

Has anyone else ever had this problem? I did a little research and this external unit and it's using a some type of variable spindle speed Western Digital "Green" drive. This is a Western Digital My Book for Mac, USB 2.0 unit 2.0TB Units.

As-is, the unit is almost useless to me. The sole purpose wasn't to just do back ups, it was also to be used to host a clone of both my SL and ML partitions, and allow me to eventually pull the SL partition off my internal HD all together.

And low and behold...I bought it 35 days ago so I can't return it.

I'm curious. What happened to the WD drive that was giving you problems? Did it die or is it still working?
 
I'm curious. What happened to the WD drive that was giving you problems? Did it die or is it still working?
It's still working. Aside from the timeout it likes to inject every now and then, it seems rock solid. I still don't trust it though.
 
Do you use it as a backup drive? Personally I suspect that that particular drive was designed that way to minimize power consumption. Granted, yours seems a little extreme on the timeout stuff but it's been documented on other sites as being part of the drives characteristics. It isn't intended to be a boot drive.
 
I use it as a secondary (as in not important) backup and to test new OSes. Being aware of the problem helped, otherwise you'd think there was something wrong with the OS or system. Disappointing but tolerable I guess.
 
I use it as a secondary (as in not important) backup and to test new OSes. Being aware of the problem helped, otherwise you'd think there was something wrong with the OS or system. Disappointing but tolerable I guess.
At least you got something out of it.:(
 
At least you got something out of it.:(
I suppose. But for the same money i could have gotten something that works. Moral of the story: If you think there's something wrong with something, return it, don't try to troubleshoot it thinking it's some easy fix.
 
I bought a Seagate external about two years ago, plugged it in, and it was clicking like a telegraph machine. At least I know mine was bad from the start. It immediately went back to the store. The guy acted like, "Oh, another one."
 
I use it as a secondary (as in not important) backup and to test new OSes. Being aware of the problem helped, otherwise you'd think there was something wrong with the OS or system. Disappointing but tolerable I guess.

Ironically, the drive may very well last years….it will just seem like they're very looooooooooong years.
 
Out of curiosity, was any attempt ever made to use this drive on another OS, like Windows? Possibly there are bugs in the OS drivers causing it.
 
That was attempted a long time ago with the same results. So long ago I forgot this thread was here! ;)

I've just resolved myself to putting up with it.
 
Was this one of their drive's that's encrypted by the controller? They had or have some weird setup where the combo case interface to the outside world and the controller on the drive were encrypting the drive making it virtually useless outside of its USB housing. Just wondered if maybe that wasn't causing the delay.
 
Encryption of that type is done on the fly. The errors the OP is talking about i believe were about 30 seconds or so in length.
 
Was this one of their drive's that's encrypted by the controller? They had or have some weird setup where the combo case interface to the outside world and the controller on the drive were encrypting the drive making it virtually useless outside of its USB housing. Just wondered if maybe that wasn't causing the delay.

If it's encrypting the drive, it's a secret. The manual says nothing about that, nor does the packaging, so I assume it isn't encrypted.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.