Respectful answer: I already did in my earlier post.Respectful reply: I work in design. Explain it to me from a product design point of view why someone who is handicapped would be limited by a Touch ID sensor in the existing power button?
Respectful answer: I already did in my earlier post.Respectful reply: I work in design. Explain it to me from a product design point of view why someone who is handicapped would be limited by a Touch ID sensor in the existing power button?
I still don’t see how having a Touch ID sensor in the current power button would be inconvenient. If you are RH you use your thumb; if you are LH your index finger.Respectful answer: I already did in my earlier post.
One more time. You can double-tap a button in a case. You can’t scan a print on that same button inside a case. If you make a cutout for that button, that becomes unwieldy or the case is too thin to provide much protection.I still don’t see how having a Touch ID sensor in the current power button would be inconvenient. If you are RH you use your thumb; if you are LH your index finger.
Even though Face ID is far superior to Touch ID you still need to double-tap the power button to access wallet or confirm a download. How is this any different really to scanning a fingerprint?
and maybe you won’t see this but I can only assume you have no experience with phones outside the Apple ecosystem.One more time. You can double-tap a button in a case. You can’t scan a print on that same button inside a case. If you make a cutout for that button, that becomes unwieldy or the case is too thin to provide much protection.
It doesn’t matter that you don’t understand the ergonomics involved. You just don’t. Unfortunately, my handicap makes me painfully aware of them. I’m sure that Apple does understand and it’s one of many reasons that it won’t happen.
Time to move on. Please don’t bother replying—it’s a waste of your time. Ignoring and unwatching this thread so that it won’t be a waste of mine.
I have an Apple Watch, and there are still plenty of scenarios where FaceID is necessary, and I’m just over it.Because its Apple... and they moved on from touch ID even though having both would be damn useful, but Apple only do things Apple wants not what people need it seems. The 13 series should have had touch ID on the power button I mean theres been a pandemic for a while now, but why give you a power button option when 'look here is an Apple watch' Call me cynical but thats how I see it. Get an Apple watch then you wont have to take your mask off, makes them more money than putting something sensible like a fingerprint reader on the phone.
By arguing what Apple can do, you are completely missing the point. Between known prototypes and competitors, they certainly know what is possible.and maybe you won’t see this but I can only assume you have no experience with phones outside the Apple ecosystem.
My work phone is an Xperia 10 iii and not only does the narrower profile and thick case provide excellent protection and better ergonomics but the power button fingerprint sensor is *never* a barrier to using the phone, left or right handed. I own this phone. I have had Xperia devices in the past along the same lines. I use this method every day. It’s not a problem.
You’ve not really provided enough information to provide a cohesive arguement. I appreciate that FaceID probably makes using your iPhone a lot easier but without coming back with an IRL experience you cannot possibly comment on the design of it.
To whit I do not drive and am therefore not on car forums pointing out the benefits of one automobile over another simply because I do not have any experience of using them on a daily basis.
Design 101: A competitor that has a working model of what we are trying to achieve = what we are trying to achieve.By arguing what Apple can do, you are completely missing the point. Between known prototypes and competitors, they certainly know what is possible.
My argument is what Apple won’t do and why. The only way I am wrong is if Apple does what you state. They haven’t And your arguments do not change that.
Otherwise, I am right. Nobody’s angry emoji changes this.
This is not something that you develop in such a short period of time. There are a lot of compromises that result from putting the emitters and sensors behind the screen. I think it is encouraging to hear that they are still working on it.Apple has 6 different underscreen Touch ID patents in the last 3 or 4 years. The technology is there, the patents are there. However looks like Apple does not want to do it. IF apple was going to do it they wouldn’t have come up with Face ID while wearing a mask or an Apple Watch unlock feature
As much as I would like to see this my hopes are shrinking
Apple has 6 different underscreen Touch ID patents in the last 3 or 4 years. The technology is there, the patents are there. However looks like Apple does not want to do it. IF apple was going to do it they wouldn’t have come up with Face ID while wearing a mask or an Apple Watch unlock feature
As much as I would like to see this my hopes are shrinking
On the Android phones I have used with under display fingerprint sensors they work really well unless your hands are greasy.This is not something that you develop in such a short period of time. There are a lot of compromises that result from putting the emitters and sensors behind the screen. I think it is encouraging to hear that they are still working on it.