It doesn't have to charge every night (and certainly not all night). I wear my watch every day and every night. It charges for like an hour in the evening or sometimes gets a top-up in the morning or during the day.Love the design and the features, but the battery life alone have kept me away for now. What’s the point of sleep tracking and things like night mode when the device has to charge every night so one can use it the day after? Using smart watches from Garmin that is more activity oriented that lives for a week or so before the battery runs flat.
Your Needs don’t exclusively define the target market. I would like to see Apple improve the system significantly increase times between required charging coupled with significant reductions in time required to charge And feature growth. It takes a village.Never had an issue with battery life. Would prefer tangible features.
You share a bed with your iPhone? 🤣.I really don't care much for extra sensors, I would prefer it get thinner and with better battery life, even though I've had S0, S3, S4, S5 watches, and I've always managed thru the day just fine. I don't even have a battery life complication enabled on, because it lastsme just fine from 7am till 11pm daily. I put it on the charger when I go to sleep along with my iPhone.
Battery life increases will clearly have diminishing returns in terms of increased sales. A 24 hour life would do it for me. With design margin, 30 hours seems like an appropriate goal. If I really need more I can get 2 watches and swap ever other day or just plan mY day around the 60 minutes required for a complete recharge.Unless it leaps to 4 or 5 days, increased battery life beyond 36 hours or so seems kind of pointless. Only edge cases, endurance runners and triathletes would really benefit on a day to day basis, and those people likely use a Garmin or equivalent anyway.
I’d guess super fast charging would be more welcome for most people, although that might worsen battery health quicker I suppose.
I don’t see why the need to upgrade every year but, for the people who can’t afford to upgrade every year I had the 5 it is almost 2 years old and the Battery life didn’t last as much as they normally do. I had to get the 6 but, I want more battery life. If that happens to a new watch that would die maybe at 8 or 7 it could loose battery life and stay longer because of more battery life. You always want better battery life. The watch is something I don’t want to charge. At around 10 my watch could have 50 percent left. The 5 would be dead by 10 latest.“Apple delays features for the Apple Watch Series 7 so that they will have something to sell for the Series 8.”
(I know, I know, it’s just a joke😉)
I have used Apple Watch since the first generation in 2015 and I’ve upgraded every generation or 2 since then. The battery life has never been a concern for me. I just charge it overnight during sleep and at the end of the day it’s down to around 40-50% always.
I’d prefer more sensors than adding battery life UNLESS they can make it to last 3-4 days.
I think the major part you have to realize is more sensors = more batter life usage.“Apple delays features for the Apple Watch Series 7 so that they will have something to sell for the Series 8.”
(I know, I know, it’s just a joke😉)
I have used Apple Watch since the first generation in 2015 and I’ve upgraded every generation or 2 since then. The battery life has never been a concern for me. I just charge it overnight during sleep and at the end of the day it’s down to around 40-50% always.
I’d prefer more sensors than adding battery life UNLESS they can make it to last 3-4 days.
So the part that's true now is if you decide to go on longer runs, walks, bike rides, or frankly anything that uses the sensors for any significant amount of time, this percentage doesn't hold. Mostly I'm doing around 30 minute exercise sessions, but definitely notice it with longer workouts even more. That's my major use for the apple watch, and I'm not using any apps on it.The battery life has never been a concern for me. I just charge it overnight during sleep and at the end of the day it’s down to around 40-50% always.
One thing they could probably figure out is just charging the watch faster. It already charges pretty quick compared to our other devices, but if we could top up from empty in like 15 mins while we jump in the shower or whatever it would make life a little easier.
Agree about sleep tracking. I'd use it if I didn't have to worry about battery life during the day. I'd rather not have to charge the watch before going to bed, but I'd be OK putting it back on the charger for an hour or so between the time I wake up and the time I leave. I may give it a try tonight and see how much battery that leaves me with.I think the major part you have to realize is more sensors = more batter life usage.
So the part that's true now is if you decide to go on longer runs, walks, bike rides, or frankly anything that uses the sensors for any significant amount of time, this percentage doesn't hold. Mostly I'm doing around 30 minute exercise sessions, but definitely notice it with longer workouts even more. That's my major use for the apple watch, and I'm not using any apps on it.
The Apple Watch also advertises Sleep Tracking, which for me is a multi step process, which I simply stopped doing.
Basically right now, I have a feeling many others avoid using it's sleep tracking feature because of the battery requirements. I'm not sure what everyone else is doing (fitbit, etc) but it's clear everyone else is in the longer battery camp. I think in order to add a cool new sensor, you need more battery life as even now using all the features, with an active lifestyle is super hard with the current battery life.
- Charge the watch before going to bed, as it won't track since it tells you it's too low (You can't charge it too much otherwise you just fall asleep without it)
- When you wake up, charge it a bit so you can exercise
- Charge it also at some point during the day so you can use the sleep tracking feature again.
(All of this doesn't even mention the LTE/Cellular watch folks which it seems like the battery drain is *very* intense in cellular mode. I'm always on Wifi/Bluetooth mode)
5 day battery life is not an edge case. It’s wonderful.Unless it leaps to 4 or 5 days, increased battery life beyond 36 hours or so seems kind of pointless. Only edge cases, endurance runners and triathletes would really benefit on a day to day basis, and those people likely use a Garmin or equivalent anyway.
I’d guess super fast charging would be more welcome for most people, although that might worsen battery health quicker I suppose.
I mean as far as Apple are concerned where they’ve positioned the Apple Watch.5 day battery life is not an edge case. It’s wonderful.
Why? Turn off the always on nonsense and battery life is fine for daily use.
The only thing I want from the next version is a blood pressure monitor like several of the competitors have and the ability to run more apps natively away from the iPhone. There is no excuse to be on version 7 of this thing, packing a processor that’s faster than an iPhone that was released just a few years ago, yet not be able to stably run most apps without checking in with Daddy iPhone first.