I’m going to believe this rumour, because I don’t want to the ones from yesterday/this morning.
Considering the performance of the M1?I was hoping for 16 cores.
M2 or M1x only 2 more cores than the 8 in the M1?
Could you explain why this statement is true? I believe you, I just don’t understand the connection.If these truly have only two efficiency cores, they cannot possibly be the same cores as M1.
Welcome back to common sense.redesigned chassis with the return of more ports, including an HDMI port, SD card slot, and a MagSafe magnetic charging cable.
Could you explain why this statement is true? I believe you, I just don’t understand the connection.
Sounds like good news, especially if these cores are a newer generation. I'm very curious to see how well apps easily scale across multiple cores (CPU and GPU). This has been a major limitation in the past of systems that rely of large numbers of cores; if the software can't be *easily* written to take advantage of them then a vast swath of software simply won't run anywhere near as fast as it could (the devs simply won't or can't invest the time and money to optimize it.) Look at how slow iMovie encoding can be compared to Handbrake (iMovie uses a maximum of around 4 cores, making it much slower to encode than Handbrake can be). The PS3 also had this problem (which is why some games looked and performed incredibly poorly (FO3, looking at you here) and a handful were so good they still look great today (GT5 even does stereoscopic gameplay while looking downright splendid.)
I'm very much hoping that Apple has figured out a way around this so that nearly anything, no matter how poorly coded, will make use of as many of the CPU and GPU cores as possible. I'm *guessing* that this will be especially important with the machine with a high-number of GPU cores.
Does this mean that Apple isn’t binning M-series chips like other manufacturers do? Do they just not use any “subpar” parts?The ratio of performance to efficiency cores that optimize overall performance is carefully chosen based on the capabilities of the cores and the nature of the workload (i.e. how the OS and applications behave).
The latter hasn’t changed. But now we are allegedly going to have just two cores doing the same work that 4 cores did on M1. And the ratio is changing from 1:1 to 4:1 - a big jump. That suggests to me that the new efficiency cores are more capable than the old ones - in other words, the gap in performance between efficiency and performance cores appears to have decreased for some reason.
There will always be something better coming down the pipelineI am waiting for the mini LED update likely next year.
No rumors on that MaCook release yet?
Ah, we've been down this road before. "Summer" in Apple speech means mid September.Apple plans to launch new 14-inch and 16-inch MacBook Pro models with an improved iteration of the M1 chip as early as this summer
What makes you think this rumor is more believable than the other?Feels like an intentional leak this time to counteract the fake news.