Love the iPhone Air concept (a few days back finally held it in hand - just wow!), but not with current limitations. Sign me up when there's a proper second speaker and a ultra-wide camera.
Most commentators don't. Because they do not own the phone. Not one person mentioned its usability and in hand feel. That is the whole point of there phone.I never understood the idea of the air, a phone that is more expensive, potentially slower, has less features including the cameras then the base mode. Its only "advantage" is that its thinner.
Well that kind of backed fired. The 16e is 6.1 inches. The Air 6.5. And the 16e is still heavier at 167grams. No comparison to be made. You just made a point that actually supports the Air. 👍Absolutely!
iPhone "air" isn't "air" at all, when considering weight and many previous iPhones, or even the current 16e.
iPhone 16e: 167 grams
iPhone Air: 165 grams
iPhone 12: 164 grams
iPhone 8/SE2: 148 grams
iPhone SE3: 144 grams
iPhone 13 Mini: 141 grams
iPhone 7: 138 grams
iPhone SE1: 113 grams
I’m sure that’s true for many. Myself, speakers on an iPhone don’t matter. The only real audio I use is when I’m using the device as a phone and I have it lifted to my ear… or when it is connected to Apple CarPlay, which doesn’t use the built-in speaker(s). But I would have these questions for iPhone Air owners: 1) Is the ring volume loud enough? 2) Is the audio loud enough when using the speaker phone?needs stereo speakers...
The problem is, that so few people feel your way. The air 2 is getting delayed becuase no one is buying it. Its rather obvious having a more expensive phone that does less then the base model phone is not attracting many buyersBut more importantly I am willingly giving up to get the benefit of the lightness of the phone. It disappears in my pocket.
The Air is clearly hurt by the base 17 getting so many quality-of-life improvements (ProMotion, higher standard storage), that the $799 entry is close to a no-brainer if you're shopping for a new iPhone right now. It won't be like that forever, and if the next Air and the base model 18 are both released in spring 2027 as rumored, it will be interesting to see what Apple leaves off the feature list for the 18, especially if the A20 SoC is indeed a far more expensive chip because of the 2 nm process.The problem is, that so few people feel your way. The air 2 is getting delayed becuase no one is buying it. Its rather obvious having a more expensive phone that does less then the base model phone is not attracting many buyers
You're profile picture tells me all I need to know.A lot of stunningly beautiful people have big noses. At least in my opinion. Maybe not GIGANTIC noses though. If their nose was shaped like an iPhone camera bump, I'd have to think about it.
I mean that slim phones with one camera are limited for todays modern standard “saving digital memories” talking about. So I dont see teenagers aging for this “limited” device.With all sincere respect (as one of these "old age people you reference) I truly don't get your point. I, for one, did not buy it because I had no interest in photos. I truly have no idea what you are talking about.
The Dog Nose All, Sees All. Might even have a SawzAll for construction work.You're profile picture tells me all I need to know.
I prefer an Ultrawide at 200mp which would essentially do it all.I think they would rake in the sales if they made this $899 with two rear cameras and a little more battery—which may be possible with the new 2nm chips coming next year.
I would only consider it if the out the 4x from the Pro on here. I rarely ever use my ultra wide, and the 4/8x on the 17 Pro actually makes for a very good macro lens. I got a crazy shot of the eye of a treefrog a few weeks ago using the telephoto. Allowed me to not disturb the frog and ruin the shot.
You have to own the phone to get what I am saying. As most do. Thats the problem. Most dont give it a chance. But one speaker and one camera is not good. They can do better. Samsung did it.The problem is, that so few people feel your way. The air 2 is getting delayed becuase no one is buying it. Its rather obvious having a more expensive phone that does less then the base model phone is not attracting many buyers
I don't need to own a product to discern a bad design, misjudged priories and low user engagementYou have to own the phone to get what I am saying
Rightfully soMost dont give it a chance.
Yes, its getting delayed to improve the phone, precisely because no one is buying it. If the phone was flying off the shelves, it makes no sense to delay the Air 2 for a year. You don't fix what's not broken. The Air's design is broken so now Apple is scramblingIts getting delayed to improve the phone. Not because no one is buying.
Apple is no longer planning to launch a second-generation iPhone Air next fall and has “already sharply scaled back production of the first version,” The Information reports. The next Air is instead likely to launch in spring 2027 at the earliest, and will be upgraded with a second camera lens, according to a follow-up Information report.
The company launched the super-thin version of the iPhone in September, but it seemingly hasn’t proven to be a big hit, and Apple is apparently making some changes to its plans for the phone’s follow-up.
You can argue that missing features are hurting the Air, that's a legit argument. However you can't find a review that says that the Air is a bad phone because it isn't. It's feature-limited as a choice in favor of weight and size conservation. Most of us who bought it knew that and are happy with the choice. The trash can Mac Pro and the 2016 MBP line were plagued by real design flaws: inability to handle heat, the butterfly keyboard, etc. If you can't discern the difference, I can't help you.I don't need to own a product to discern a bad design, misjudged priories and low user engagement
Funnily enough that was an excuse that some apple fans were making with the trash can mac pro - you don't own it, so you don't know how good that was (we do, it was a flop). Or the 2016 MBP with the much derided touchbar and failed keyboard.
The Air is plagued by design flaws as well, in that its a billed as a premium device that does less then the base model for 200 dollars over the base model.However you can't find a review that says that the Air is a bad phone because it isn't.
...
The trash can Mac Pro and the 2016 MBP line were plagued by real design flaws:
Every iPhone model has design flaws. The Pro and Pro Max are ugly as sin and are prone to scratching. The regular 17 has a tired design, the 16e has the notch. Apple will learn its lessons and adjust for the next release. If they don't we'll end up with fewer choices. You'd love that, huh?The Air is plagued by design flaws as well, in that its a billed as a premium device that does less then the base model for 200 dollars over the base model.
While that my may be my opinion, what is not an opinion is that the phone isn't selling well, so much so they paused/halted production and has delayed the introduction of the Air 2 for at least a year.
None of that is true. They predicted via Gurman that they were only projected to sell 6-8 percent. And the Air isn't going anywhere. Funny thing is everything you just stated about the iphone Air was stated about the original Air laptop. Every single point you made. The Air got so good it replaced the standard non pro mac in the lineup. For good. Yes you kinda have to own the phone to 'get it'.I don't need to own a product to discern a bad design, misjudged priories and low user engagement
Funnily enough that was an excuse that some apple fans were making with the trash can mac pro - you don't own it, so you don't know how good that was (we do, it was a flop). Or the 2016 MBP with the much derided touchbar and failed keyboard.
Rightfully so
With the base model iPhone 17, you get better battery performance, better cameras, better speakers for 200 dollars less. When most businesses roll out a "premium" edition product, they actually add/improve the product. Most companies don't sell a product that does less has less for money and slap a premium sticker on it. Not Apple, they went with addition through subtraction - You pay more to get less.
Yes, its getting delayed to improve the phone, precisely because no one is buying it. If the phone was flying off the shelves, it makes no sense to delay the Air 2 for a year. You don't fix what's not broken. The Air's design is broken so now Apple is scrambling
Apple Delays Release of Next iPhone Air Amid Weak Sales
Apple reportedly pulls plug on iPhone Air 2 after weak sales of debut model
The next iPhone Air has reportedly been delayed
I don’t live in a country with free devices with carrier contracts, so low sales shouldn’t be an issue if it’s a common behavior. However, I only saw someone using the Air once. When I checked the device at the store, I felt it lacked a camera setup. The camera section looked cheap and counterbalanced the device’s thinness, which is its sole marketing point. The long, empty protruding camera bump with a single lens looked like it had a version with triple cameras, but I purchased the lowest model. Apple should have added two lenses and made it more expensive than a regular iPhone. A single lens version should only be 100 higher than E models and 1000 cheaper than non-pro models. Thinness would not sell, unless it’s as thin as a credit card.I think many factors are at play but the most important is one that no one mentions — the carriers. You can get a “free” iPhone 17 or a “free” iPhone 17 Pro with a three year contract. You can also get an iPhone Air for “free” with a three year contract but the carriers do not show the iPhone Air prominently or at all on their home page. Visibility is so important and under-appreciated.