Yes, enjoy yourThe EU needs to stop with their money grabbing overreaching policies and acting like they run the planet
Numbers speak for themselves:
Yes, enjoy yourThe EU needs to stop with their money grabbing overreaching policies and acting like they run the planet
Numbers speak for themselves:
The irony is the EU is acting as a gatekeeper itself and its fine structure is absolutely bananas - the idea daily fines amounting to 5% global revenue is just insanity, massive overreach.
Calling the EU nice is overly generous, they just using bully tactics to bring companies to the negotiating table - possibly even worse than how Trump has done it.
That may be true for Americans living in the US, but it doesn't apply to those living in the EU. The EU does not have a federal government, period!
It's a bit funny why Americans living in the US are so concerned about EU regulations.
That’s what they feel they have to say. But, the fact that they are actually meeting with the gatekeepers to get something completed and closed is a significant departure from the way Vestager would not let regulators meet with them.The latest EC press conferences about this topic give me a different vibe: https://audiovisual.ec.europa.eu/en/media/video/I-277703
What I always find funny about such figures is that they refer to facts that have nothing to do with normal people.The EU needs to stop with their money grabbing overreaching policies and acting like they run the planet
Numbers speak for themselves:
Umm I think the country where Apple one campus is located should do the same, but extend to military and more.The EU needs to stop with their money grabbing overreaching policies and acting like they run the planet
Numbers speak for themselves:
The EU is an association of states. This makes it more efficient and effective for every citizen and every company.
Oh, you know what... anyone who refers to a state or association of states as a “gatekeeper” has spent too long in the American education and media system.
It would be like arguing with a flat-earther.
Exactly. Just because a country has high GDP doesn’t mean their citizens would benefit from it, unless we are talking about national pride then idk maybe.Now tell me, when was the last time your life improved because GDP rose?
Never. There are developing countries with massive GDPs where 90% of the people are starving. Because GDP never reaches the citizens.
How?They impact us regardless of whether or not we live there.
One way or another, we’ll get them. Twenty-seven countries have to agree, whether they are small or large.And I wouldn’t be so sure “compromise” will mean that you get everything you want.
Now tell me, when was the last time your life improved because GDP rose?
Never. There are developing countries with massive GDPs where 90% of the people are starving. Because GDP never reaches the citizens.
And I thought its nemesis doing the same was bad. Turns out they are two sides of a coin after all.You'll have to forgive us Americans. As I've been reminded recently in discussions with some college age relatives, we are absolutely inundated with neo-liberal brainwashing in our schools here.
The indoctrination of this as "the only and best way" is on par with religious indoctrination.
It's actually pretty impressive (and depressing).
China appeared to deal with them just fine by restricting sales of new products until their needs were met. Indonesia as well. Fines are, apparently, not the ONLY way to deal with entities the size and scale of Apple. And, actually, not even the most effective way.This is the only way to deal with entities the size and scale of Apple.
Let me introduce you to the very real problem of systemic injustice.Oh no, people are expected to take responsibility for their own lives. How horrible!
Let me introduce you to the very real problem of systemic injustice.
In America, you can bust your ass and get nothing, or do **** all and be handed the world.
Tell me, where does personal responsibility enter into that equation?
One thing. The DMA includes language that says that, even if a company action does not go against the letter of the DMA, a regulator can still say it’s an issue if they feel it should be. The iPad became a gatekeeper device via this part of the DMA as it most certainly didn’t meet the quantitative thresholds, but Vestager felt that one day it MIGHT meet those thresholds, so it was designated a gatekeeper device.First, these regulations are not vague. Even an American can understand them.
You’re conflating my personal opinion with the actual facts of the matter being discussed at hand and attempting to discern a nonexistent personal belief about perceived social mattersI guess that is where the culture gap shows. In the EU we do not feel the need to be the best at everything. For me success means a steady job that pays enough to save some money, where I can put the pen down at 5 pm (1 pm on Friday) and enjoy my 34 vacation days. That is success to me
The easiest one is that all the time and money spent implementing features no one is asking for like “browser choice screen on device setup” and “ability to uninstall the camera app” weren’t spent on features actually making the device better.How?
I have no doubt the EU will “get what it wants”, I do doubt that it will result in what they say it will result in, and that third party stores ever become a thing. Because they're not on Android, which has been open since Day 1.One way or another, we’ll get them. Twenty-seven countries have to agree, whether they are small or large.
This law was specifically written with the intention of targeting successful American companies - the very law mandates a minimum of $75 billion market capitalization threshold for which to adhere to these stringent regulations - thereby excluding the vast majority of companies worldwide
I would simply reduce economic efforts relative to the fine. If it means switching down certain EU operations for two months, then do it. The EU must learn that if the fines are exorbitant and the rules eccentric and egregious, then companies will cover the costs of fines by removing economic output in a region. Apple should also switch its European HQ outside the EU.
Sorry. I forgot I'm supposed to say "best country in the world" before ICE busts through my door and throws me in the clink for not spouting approved propaganda.
It also ensures their companies won't be ensnared, because their regulations actively discourage innovation and drive European tech workers and companies to the US. But don't take my word for it, here's ASML's CFOTargeting the largest firms surprises you?
The larger the firm and with more clout and market power, the more need to be regulated (almost by definition).
The European Union’s rules on artificial intelligence are driving tech workers and companies to Silicon Valley, a top executive from the Dutch chipmaking giant ASML has said.
"Why is it so difficult to get AI done in Europe? Simply because we started with regulating, to keep AI under the thumb,” ASML’s Chief Financial Officer Roger Dassen told an event in Eindhoven on Monday evening.
“Someone who has a talent for artificial intelligence, the first thing they do with their hard-earned money ... is buying a ticket to Silicon Valley,” Dassen said.