Who would you choose?Craig isn't CEO material. If he were he'd have left Apple a decade ago and given it a go at his own start up. I speak from a personal relationship with him. Great guy, not the guy you want running Steve's legacy.
Who would you choose?Craig isn't CEO material. If he were he'd have left Apple a decade ago and given it a go at his own start up. I speak from a personal relationship with him. Great guy, not the guy you want running Steve's legacy.
What I posted above is not hyperbole or nonsensical. Certain facts if posted on these forums do get removed.Ah. Glad you realize that when posting nonsensical, hyperbole there is a limit. Not to worry, it’s possible even that last bit of nonsense can be removed.
Tim Cook is not CEO material either. He's an amazing COO but as for CEO, lets just say Apple (ie Jobs) could have chosen better.Craig isn't CEO material. If he were he'd have left Apple a decade ago and given it a go at his own start up. I speak from a personal relationship with him. Great guy, not the guy you want running Steve's legacy.
I understand. You do not know what I know. I can't say any more on this.What I posted above is not hyperbole or nonsensical. Certain facts if posted on these forums do get removed.
That's all that can be said here. MacRumours (ie the forum staff) are fully aware of the situation though . . . and I can say no more on this here, either unfortunately
In your opinion. With 1 billion customers, lots of shareholders, many observers, many critics, there are certainly a plethora of opinions. Your opinion is just one out of the many.Tim Cook is not CEO material either. He's an amazing COO but as for CEO, lets just say Apple (ie Jobs) could have chosen better.
I don't want Cook want running Steve's legacy, but none of us have a choice in that. Just like with Craig. If Apple want him, Apple will get him, regardless of how good a CEO he will be.