And will forever remain that way till iPad is replaced by something else, something thats not a tablet.I look forward to the M5 iPad Pro 13in starting at £1600, with the same ‘great’ OS we know and love (apparently).
the 11 inch is the upper limit of what you can carry around comfortably, in my opinion. the same applies to the weight of the 11 inch by itself. if you also get the folio (cover) for it however, even the 11 inch becomes too heavy to hold it in one hand comfortably.Any thoughts on the size difference?
My perhaps faulty interpretation of the charts are they are based on revenue but many of us are seeing them as unit volume.
It would be interesting to see the volume numbers. That would show if the total volume grew and which segments grew the most. Without those numbers, it’s hard to say if iPad Pros grew at the iPad’s expense or an increase in volume accounted for the revenue increase.
I suspect, if Mini sales keep falling it will be dropped from the lineup. At some point, it becomes to small of a market to warrant the costs of updating it.
Apple needs to simplify the ipad lineup. It's a complete mess.
The price of the iPad Pro is already unbearably high, which is really scary.
Another valid interpretation is that Air owners didn't see a reason to upgrade, while Mini owners can't upgrade, and the Pro's share only increased because they are losing revenue at the other models.
This "data" is from CIRP - the same people behind the "data" that shows that the $7k Mac Pro is outselling the $1300 iMac, and the MacBook Pro is outselling the MacBook Air.
Both would be consistent with the figures being based on revenue rather than unit sales.
However, given the report doesn't bother to state such a fundamental detail - nor does it give any details of how the figures were obtained, or what the confidence intervals may be - a much simpler conclusion is to throw the whole thing on the "hogwash until proven otherwise" pile. If it's based on a small survey, the changes might not even be statistically significant... (Mind you - that applies to 93.72% of all data published in the mass media).
Is this % of sales revenue or number of units sold? It isn't clear and a major difference there if viewing "popularity"
For those of you wondering units ipad sales vs revenues, look at the original CIRP article which was linked in the MR article:are these percentages based on revenue or units? makes a big difference when pro's can cost 2-3x as much a classic.
Apple | 13,908 | 38.7% | 11,736 | 38.7% |