Emergency Technological Hologram activating: "Please state the nature of the technological emergency."They're going to resurrect Steve Jobs as an AI hologram to run the company.
Emergency Technological Hologram activating: "Please state the nature of the technological emergency."They're going to resurrect Steve Jobs as an AI hologram to run the company.
Satya Nadella killed Windows Phone.Apple needs a Satya Nadella.
I don't see many upset APPL shareholders, period.Apple shareholders must be upset that NVidia beat them to 5T market cap hahaha
Even holograms had a crush on Seven. 😆Emergency Technological Hologram activating: "Please state the nature of the technological emergency."
Another thing I think people aren’t keeping in mind, just because Tim isn’t CEO doesn’t mean he’s necessarily gone from the company.
He’s pretty much certain to remain on apple‘s board, if not become the new chairman.
Apple has a rule that no one on their board is over 75 years of age, and… oh hey, what do you know it, their current chairman of the board was born in 1950 and it’s 2025..
The products have been good, but very safe giving people what they wanted, a MBP full of old ports that aren’t used by most.
And yet they killed the iPhone mini after only two years. 😢 😉Right, and even products like the Mac and the iPod were not initial successes.
The Mac didn’t reach its first peak until 1989, six years after it hit the market, and it really didn’t become the “Mac” of today until the iMac in 1998, 12 years after the initial introduction.
The first iPod took almost 2 years to sell a measly 1 million units.
We talk about these products now as if they were instant successes the day they went on sale, but that was just not the case.
That’s putting it very lightly.I can see Cook becoming the new board chairman. Over the years he has accumulated a ton of inside Apple knowledge that's very valuable.
You joke but in retrospect, that was kind of a strange decision.And yet they killed the iPhone mini after only two years. 😢 😉
Someone worse at least would make it clear that it's time to move on, instead of keeping us in the limbo that maybe, maybe Apple will get their act together again.I know many posting here don't like Tim, but before you cheer you need to find out if they replace him with someone better or even worse.
We? I don't think you have any idea of what Apple is.We need a design focused leader that will take risks on new technology, someone with long term vision. Apple nowadays can afford it without too much risk to its bottom line. This is a must to get Apple back in the leadership position on the market.
No more chasing a high stock price with buy backs etc. Spend that money on R&D!
Jobs would have been fired / forced out sometime ago. He was completely ill-suited to guide Apple through the last 10+ years.an AI Steve Jobs would probably do a better job at developing products than the robot Tim Crook.
How many people actually use AppleTV and what purpose does it serve? TV's have the same apps.
Retail has been dying for years. It's only a matter of time before the stores are mostly gone. UPS/Apple requires a signature for expensive items.
I beg to differ. The enthusiast - like you - wants that. The consumer bears little relationship to the people on this website. Their priority is not even close to the same. They want "cool". They also want devices that work and look good, but cool is more important to the average Apple customer.The consumer wants amazing hardware. Apple and the shareholders want profits.
I doubt that the new CEO will be an amazing hardware designer.
I think Tim was better than OK, at least during the decade after Steve’s death. It’s only been the past two to three years in which Apple seems to be loosing progress. No, he’s no Steve Jobs, but for a good number of years that didn’t seem to matter given how well Apple was doing.Cook is OK but he's no Jobs.
I mean, Apple does have an obligation to share holders. Personally I’d prefer a world where these big corporations can be privately owned and focus on design over profit but that will require stock buybacks.No more chasing a high stock price with buy backs etc. Spend that money on R&D!