Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
You're equating a physical break in to a house being the same as a breach of online security... That is nearly as moronic as the car analogies computer enthusiasts try to use all the time while comparing hardware.

As far as we know he is telling us the truth. He found vulnerabilities and divulged them to Apple. He could have very easily taken as much as possible and gone off to sell the users information and metadata. Also, if he is telling the truth, Apple if they sue him, is going to set a very dangerous precedent (for itself and possibly others) as no one in their right mind would let them know about a security vulnerability in the future.

Again, this is assuming there is not another part to the story. However, the way things are going (I am talking overarching in the tech sector), I could just imagine Apple beating him to death anyway with a few lies and lawyers. Then parading about saying, "Look we destroyed the bad hacker...who let us know about a security issue that put your information at risk." Then some overzealous attorney general trying to make a name for them self will step in and put the harshest penalty on him... yeah this guy should have just not said anything.

I find comparing cars and hardware idiotic too but in this case, his analogy actually works. Let him try to break in to your house but since all of security measures must be in place, make sure you to call the police when he tries because that also is a security measures that he's suppose to go around.
 
Well if it didn't happen Apple wouldn't have taken measures to improve security. Pretty straightforward.

Exactly! One has to assume Apple was not aware of the security holes otherwise they would have patched them. Hopefully! As others have pointed out, you really have no idea how secure or safe you are until someone decides to test it.

How do you stop someone from, for example, starting a fire? The answer is that you take reasonable precautions, but basically there is nothing you can do to stop every possibility without draconian measures that inconvenience everyone.
 
Then why did he go inside and take stuff?

Because Apple oNLY cares if the break in is made public. They don't care if data are stolen and no one finds out. The do care about their public image.

If he broken in then just told Apple the only thing that would happen is his email would be deleted.

What this guy has done is made is reputation more valuable. He is the guy who shut down the Apple dev site. Now he can charge clients a MUCH higher hourly rate.

If he had been the guy who sent Apple an bug report which was ignored he would not be able to charge his clients more. Heck I can send a report to Apple's bit-bucket.
 
he had to actually hack apple to prove that the vulnerability existed
he was only proving that the door was unlocked
what was behind the door was not relavent to him

Guess what: He didn't have to prove that any vulnerability existed. And according to his claims, what was behind the door was very much relevant, because he took it.
 
developer.apple.com is working

so this means it will be new beta at 10pm and DP4 some time later.
 
Some of the people are just to dumb for their own self. They do one thing good, act dumb.

I mean seriously, if you want to hack something, talk to the company and get their approval to "test" their systems on a site that is not the actual public site or something like that. If they (Apple) refuses to acknowledge, then take it to the news and make it public, that way Apple has to do something. Don't just hack and say sorry. Just wow.

It occurred to me, how have tried to get permission to crack (correct term) a test site?
Apple probably does not want to do it, since if the crack works on a test site, then it will work on the live site, and just gives a lot more crackers (oft called hackers) the practice to run amok.

I recall Kasperky told Apple of a dangerous Mac virus about 2 years back. For about 1 month Apple ignored him, but suddenly revered course and aggressively attacked the virus with built in anti-virus efforts.

Apple seems to have a sens of invulnerability.

Even if this person did keep the ID's, the fact the revealed the bugs and vulnerabilities is worth far, far more. Now Apple knows it has a problem and will change it. Much better then not knowing and having massive IT theft.
 
Apparently feel that this claim researcher has crossed or breached the limit to show the loophole as a researcher.
 
Count your blessings

For those excoriating this guy you should count your blessings. At least he didn't do this: http://arstechnica.com/security/201...ssword-data-for-2-million-ubuntu-forum-users/

We all know there is no 100% hack proof security. The best we can hope for is vigilance from those we trust with our information... and a quick response.

My take from this is a hacker exposed a hole in Apple's security. Apple is fixing it. That fix is for the betterment of the dev community over the long haul. Someone with far more nefarious motives could have found the exploit and done far worse.

I am not in agreement with the youtube self-aggrandisement, but not everyone expresses themselves the way we would.
 
Actually, that page, developer.apple.com has been up the entire time.

The access page they're talking about, which is still down is accessible through the "iOS dev Center" and "Mac Dev Center". Click those links, and you'll see the maintenance message.
 
Apple needs to take a break for messing with phones. They seem to be putting all their resources into making trivial changes to things like the screen size and the exact shape of color used for an icon.

At one time Apple's software was way ahead. They used BSD on a Mach micro kernel to build NetStep. That effort was way out in front of everything else. But in the last 10 years they just sat on top of that, they have matured it and added stuff but nothing "new", no leap forward.

It appears now that even Apple's web site designers are technically inept to allow this to happen at all. Why does't Apple have a dozen full-time engineers trying to break into their own sites. And if they do have such a team they need to be fired.

Apple needs to actually be different again.
 
As sad as it is. Apple is pretty poor on dealing with security issues. Holes stay in there until someone makes it public. It is sad that it like that. Apple has had some pretty huge holes in the system that they were told about months before hand and did NOTHING until it was made public. Then they fix it with in a very short amount of time and chances are that fix became a rush job and not done the best way.
 
Because Apple oNLY cares if the break in is made public. They don't care if data are stolen and no one finds out. The do care about their public image.

If he broken in then just told Apple the only thing that would happen is his email would be deleted.

What this guy has done is made is reputation more valuable. He is the guy who shut down the Apple dev site. Now he can charge clients a MUCH higher hourly rate.

If he had been the guy who sent Apple an bug report which was ignored he would not be able to charge his clients more. Heck I can send a report to Apple's bit-bucket.

There is a problem with that though. Because iOS devices are used in government/financial/health care facilities and Apple has contracts with all of those branches then they must comply with the laws and publicly state when a security breach has occurred. Both SOX and HIPAA laws require it. Apple has to care about it and has to deal with it in a very public manner.
 
That analogy doesn't hold. This is more of an unsolicited external penetration test :p probably the most effective test there is.

Physically breaking and entering is obviously different man :D

But how about if I hacked all of ur personal info (credit card, social security, etc, etc). Then I called u after i did it and told u all about it. And when u threatened to call the cops i assured u I wouldn't do anything malicious with it.
 
The only issue with this white knight is that he is fishing to promote himself for a job. What he did is definitely illegal.
 
Apple needs to take a break for messing with phones. They seem to be putting all their resources into making trivial changes to things like the screen size and the exact shape of color used for an icon.

At one time Apple's software was way ahead. They used BSD on a Mach micro kernel to build NetStep. That effort was way out in front of everything else. But in the last 10 years they just sat on top of that, they have matured it and added stuff but nothing "new", no leap forward.

It appears now that even Apple's web site designers are technically inept to allow this to happen at all. Why does't Apple have a dozen full-time engineers trying to break into their own sites. And if they do have such a team they need to be fired.

Apple needs to actually be different again.
But yet the topics here that get the most discussion are about iDevices and things like screen size, form factor, icons etc. :confused:
 
Exactly! One has to assume Apple was not aware of the security holes otherwise they would have patched them. Hopefully! As others have pointed out, you really have no idea how secure or safe you are until someone decides to test it.

How do you stop someone from, for example, starting a fire? The answer is that you take reasonable precautions, but basically there is nothing you can do to stop every possibility without draconian measures that inconvenience everyone.

As part of improving security, Apple could just hire someone to 'test' for security holes. Honestly, I am surprised they don't have a team of people for that purpose alone.
 
You forgot the consequences of that...

"... and go to jail for many a year."

Lets get it straight someone doing what you suggest is not a hero helping to spot security issues and help plug them. They're a thief and criminal who should be locked up.

If someone did the same thing you Samsung you'd be laughing at them.
 
Yeah, sure...

So I guess I'm happy this was done by someone who claims to be a whitehat, cause if it were a blackhat doing this, that could be pretty bad (ie, a full database dump of Apple employees' personal information on BitTorrent).

However, he went about this the wrong way. I've been in this industry for a while, and an actual professional "whitehat" penetration tester would not attack a website without written permission, probably with an actual signature in ink. You can, and he probably will, get sued really really hard over this.
 
There is a problem with that though. Because iOS devices are used in government/financial/health care facilities and Apple has contracts with all of those branches then they must comply with the laws and publicly state when a security breach has occurred. Both SOX and HIPAA laws require it. Apple has to care about it and has to deal with it in a very public manner.

Some hater saying Apple doesn't care doesn't make it true. That simple. No sane person will ignore a real and serious security hole.
 
The most amazing revelation with this story that is suggests someone at Apple actually reads bug reports submitted through bugreport.apple.com!

This seems completely contrary to my own experience - perhaps it's actually worth reporting bugs to Apple after all.

Wow, cynical. I had someone from Apple respond to me personally once for a bug report I filed. I think the type and timeliness of the response from Apple depend on a number of factors, but I have seen no reason to believe they aren't being read and taken seriously. I'd bet there's a methodology behind how those bug reports are prioritized that is far more complicated than either of us can fathom and I'm sure it's not a perfect system.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.