Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
This is definitely going to be the hot news for the next couple of weeks. News stories pointing out signs of a refresh of one or another of Apple's product lines.
 
I really, really need a 64GB Touch. The capacity is the only thing keeping me from buying a Touch.

Me too, but I need more than 64GB... if they don't release Touch with hard drive (with few gigs of flash to store interface etc. for quick access), I have to wait few years for flash to reach over 200 GB's...
 
Pleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeese High Capacity Touch. 64GB minimum!!!! I want a touch, but it's got to be worth the money!
I too would like to see this as well. That means iPhones would go to 32GB soon.

But I don't see this happening this time around. Gut feeling is that flash memory is still too expensive at this time.

Who knows, I may be wonderfully surprised. :)
 
I'd like to see an "iPod Retro" with a monochrome screen, size of a brick, 3G 4-button + scroll wheel controls and 20gb. Bonus points if it is a "distressed" shade of off-white and the back is all scuffed up. Actually, I might have one of these in a drawer somewhere...
 
iPod as a remote control

I've been wanting this for such a long time. I want to be able to remote control iTunes and other apps. using my iPod.

When I'm listening to music in my living room I have to go to my bed room to change songs and other stuff ...

how cool wouldn't it be to flip threw my albums on my iPod Touch and control the music from the couch :D

Do it Steve - do it!
 
NO 32GB NANOS
NO GPS OR HDD iPts

Really people? what were you thinking. wiki the iPod line ups, you will find a pattern to them (yet the current hdd sizes are a bit large for the greater masses)

Sorry for yelling!!
Thank you for putting some realism into this thread.

And unless someone can show me 32 GB flash chips and/or larger HDs, add "no 64 GB iPod touch" and "no iPod classic capacity bump" to the list.

RainbowApple.jpg


*Good Grief that picture posted huge!!! Sorry*
Use TIMG tags instead of IMG, like what I did with your :apple: logo.

Take away the carebears and put winnie-the-pooh and my wife and the local teenage girls will want one tomorrow.:p
Here you go:
 
need help!!!

i'm having some friends to buy an ipod touch 16 gb in the states (they'll be there from 08/30 to 09/15). With the euro change i'm saving about 70$ comparing to spain's price.

should i wait and get in spain the "hypothetical" reduced price same version in late september?

This is supposed to be my husbands b-day present that is actually 08/30, should i wait AT ALL? He is so into mac stuff that if i buy now the "hypothetical future old" version he might smash the thingy in my face and blame me for spending that much money in an obsolete gadget...

advice pleaaaase!!!

P.S. sorry if i sounded too corny :eek:
 
need help!!!

i'm having some friends to buy an ipod touch 16 gb in the states (they'll be there from 08/30 to 09/15). With the euro change i'm saving about 70$ comparing to spain's price.

should i wait and get in spain the "hypothetical" reduced price same version in late september?
The 16 GB iPod touch is likely to drop from $399 to $299 with the update.
 
I thought something was going to happen with these iPods...

In the Sunday paper I got for Target, here's what I found with this ad about the iPod Nano... (this is the ad for the area of NH). I found the online ad version since I threw my Target flyer away.

The little text is hard to see- so this is what it says:

Apple 4GB iPod nano bundle includes free $15 iTunes gift card. Nano plays video and holds up to 1,000 songs. Actual capacity may vary. Items packaged together. Available in Back-To-School Dept. Quantity limited. No rain checks.

Doesn't mean much, but I thought I'd share. :)
 

Attachments

  • untitled.JPG
    untitled.JPG
    56.7 KB · Views: 112
iPod Nano

I'm almost certain that there will be new iPod Nanos. My father works at Micron Technology in Boise (they supply plenty of goodies to Apple) and he told me several months ago that they were finishing up memory that met lower power draw specifications (for longer battery life). So I'm pretty certain to see at least new Nanos.
 
the reason iPod touch will never (afaik) see HDD is because the touch interface will not run smoothly on non-flash hardware. people complain about choppy coverflow on the iPod classic currently and that screen is half the size of the touch. let alone accelerometer based games and apps...
 
Exactly my feeling too. No Classic. No Touch. Just the iPod with BTO storage options.

you must have a very small itunes library... I certainly don't want to spend any time thinking of what i might want on my ipod today. Everything is there. easy decision....
 
Possiblity for nano touch?

What is the possibility that apple's new "nano" will be a nano touch?

This would explain the rumor of the larger, and wider screen (especially since I don't think Apple would release a larger nano than their previous version).

Seems like the next logical step to me, since the nano in it's current physical incarnation is pretty solid. So instead of replacing the old, just add a new one to the line.

What do you all think?
 
The $70/month iPhone contract...

Bingo. I already have a phone. As much as I would love an iPhone there's no way I can stomach 70/m + taxes + fees + contracts.

I'd rather the touch with a one time purchase fee, no obligations, no limits and no hidden costs.

I just hope the new models do get some sort of GPS to take advantage of the upcoming turn-by-turn. Then I could really replace my current PDA.
 
I am all for a 240GB Classic. On another apple fan site many were all over those of us wanting a high capacity HD iPod-asking who really needs or has that much music. Obviously they would never sell as many classics as nanos or touches but there are many who don't use for video but have very large music collections. I mean we have thousands of CDs and so on and want to have a good part of our collection lossless to have with us at studios, offices, vacation houses and who play our pods through really great stereos and speakers. Many of us are not on the go headphone listeners.

My 160 Classic is full and I could easily have one double capacity. I also know DJs and so on who want these too. On the other site a few were trying to figure how many iTunes downloads or CDs we've purchased to have a classic so full, but again many older collectors have thousands of CDs and want the option to have them in hand.

I really hope Apple continues the classic. We don't need a touch that big but we love all of our music to go.

Oh and some brought up streaming which I sometimes do with my iPhone from my HD at home but it is not as reliable or quality great and buffering sometimes craps out. Only great of you are WI FI ... and then there are battery and time issues...
 
I don't think they would ditch the classic for a fancy touch. In fact, I personally don't even consider the touch an iPod, its more of a PDA with iPod capabilities.
 
Why? The one you have now will still be a good Touch. Besides, the new Touch will probably just have a redesign change—nothing new that will be noteworthy.

That is what you think but there are hints that the refresh might be more interesting than you suspect. That based on noise coming from Apple that PA Semi was purchased to make chips for the iPods. That and the rumors that they where almost finished, with thee chips, at the time of Apples purchase.

Now of course that could simply mean that the PA hardware is a simple integration project to lower cost. I don't think Apple will do simple in this case though. They could easily add many features that have been asked for in respect to these devices. The such as being BluTooth, USB Master or On The Go support, better battery life, GPS and whatever else the wild masses want.

It is all depedant on what is ready hardware wise for this round of updates. It also depends somewhat on how many chips are ready. I can see them easily reaching an integration level where everything possible today on touch can be squeezed into a Nano sized device and have better battery performance. For a Touch/iPhone sized device I can see significant improvements in features and performance.

In fact if Apple has the balls to do so the next Touch could be a huge jump in performance. I could see PA doubling performance at the same power levels. This through a new ARM architecture, faster clocks and PA based power saving techniques. Imagine todays Touch running at some placed equivalent to 700 MHz, hopefully with twice the RAM.

However all this being said there is no sense in returning a Touch. First this is speculation! Second it must have been good enough for you at the time of purchase.

Dave
 
Think again!!!

Um, I don't think so - the GPS on the iPhone is heavily dependent on there being intertubes where you are (aka, 3g/EDGE). Wifi is prevalent, but not the point that I think the GPS on the iPt would be so valuable...
[\quote]
I'm not sure were your misunderstanding comes from but the GPS hardware on the IPhone is not dependant on any sort of cell connection. The maps app corrently shipping with IPhone IS but that is one software package.

Unless, they are going to put a radio in the iPt to use it for streaming music only. Maybe something with AT&T for like $10-15 a month and you can get some internets. Would go well with the patent from a few weeks ago about streaming media to mobile devices. Could be a cool idea for those that don't want/can't get an iPhone but want a little more out of their iPt.

There are all lsorts of approaches to GPS data storage but on of the most useful concepts for a GPS enabled Touch based device is that of downloadable maps already used in the industry. Given that an extremely large area can be compressed into less than a gigabyte of memory this is not a problem. Especially if the new iPod come with 64 & 128 GB of flash.

As to GPS I can understand not everyone needing it or wanting to pay for it. I would not be surprised to see Apple offer stripped down models without this feature. More expensive Touches could offer up GPS, audio in any a host of other luster after features. This allows Apple to drive down the price on basic functionality while protecting it's flank with more advanced models.

Hey can't be more than a couple of weeks now.



Dave
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.