jav6454
macrumors Core
Im trying to decide on a new mac to buy and I have been looking at the 2013 15inch Retina Macbook Pro.
[...]
Thanks for your Help
>Gaming
>Laptop
You must always pick one. Never both on one. Specially with mobile GPUs.
Im trying to decide on a new mac to buy and I have been looking at the 2013 15inch Retina Macbook Pro.
[...]
Thanks for your Help
The GT 650M vs GTX 660 comparison?
the 660 runs circles around the 650 especially considering the 650 works with less and slower RAM. The clock speed is higher, memory bandwidth is almost 3x faster
Battery life is almost exactly the same. Edge going to the rMBP
Im trying to decide on a new mac to buy and I have been looking at the 2013 15inch Retina Macbook Pro.
Specs I am Looking at:
2.4GHz quad-core Intel Core i7
Turbo Boost up to 3.4GHz
8GB RAM 1600MHz memory
256GB flash storage1
Intel HD Graphics 4000
NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M with 1GB of GDDR5 memory
This laptop will defiantly suit most of my needs from a laptop. My only question is if you can play games on the native resolution, specially Team Fortress 2, and Minecraft. (2880x1800)
I like to play games while I travel but I need a laptop that still looks professional (Mac imo) Let me know if you have ever played those two games on max-med settings with the native resolution and what kind of FPS you are getting.
Not sure if this is the right place to post this on the forums as I am new here.
Thanks for your Help

there is no way that the g46 gets 8h of battery life. it doesnt have optimus and asus is not remarkably efficient with their mobo designs on their G towards battery life
if you're getting an MBPR to play native res games you're just stupid. (sorry)
The MBPR handles games well on 1680x1050, and no, it will not look as good as 2880x1800.
do _NOT_ buy a mac to play games, yes, it handles games fine.. but seriously, you have to get windows on it to play most games, and if you're already on windows, why not get an alienware or ASUS or MSI if you want to game.
Get a mac because you like the OS, you like the reliability.. install windows on it for some casual gaming on the go... but do not expect 2880x1800 on a mac.. hell you cant even expect to run BF 3 100% playable on low setting with 1680x1050.
Most of budget pc and laptops can run games fine at medium settings. Post back when macbook pro can run very high/ultra settings within 50-60 fps on games like Battlefield 3 or The Witcher 2.I have the GTX 765M in my new laptop. Obviously not bleeding edge, but definitely much more powerful than the 650M I have in my iMac and the MBPs. That said, I was happy gaming on my iMac with no issues at Medium settings.
i've never ever gotten the "Better built" line that comes from a lot of apple users.
They are mass-produced just like everyone else. Look at the service manual for the macbook pro, it's scary when it comes to applying the thermal paste.
My asus is built like a tank, great cooling, looks cool and feels 100% solid.
i've never ever gotten the "Better built" line that comes from a lot of apple users.
My asus is built like a tank, great cooling, looks cool and feels 100% solid.
Most of budget pc and laptops can run games fine at medium settings. Post back when macbook pro can run very high/ultra settings within 50-60 fps on games like Battlefield 3 or The Witcher 2.
People, if you want to buy laptops purely for gaming, just go with Alienware or Razer. Those machines pack one hell of a gpu unit that creates heat like there is no tomorrow. Something that rmbp will melt or just go shut down.
i've never ever gotten the "Better built" line that comes from a lot of apple users.
They are mass-produced just like everyone else. Look at the service manual for the macbook pro, it's scary when it comes to applying the thermal paste.
My asus is built like a tank, great cooling, looks cool and feels 100% solid.
I'm sorry but anyone who owns a laptop for looks probably don't know how to use the laptop effectively. It's your opinion to diss Asus latop's look, but don't get all isheep defensive when someone else mocks your favorite mrbp's appearance in return, telling it looks like a fragile, scratch-prominent glass machine.It also *looks* like a tank... or an aborted Batman suit prototype.
I don't expect everyone who owns a Mac to have a degree in industrial design, but if you can't objectively see and feel how much more refined your MBA is as an object, then you're kinda missing half the fun of owning an Apple product.
I'm sorry but anyone who owns a laptop for looks probably don't know how to use the laptop effectively. It's your opinion to diss Asus latop's look, but don't get all isheep defensive when someone else mocks your favorite mrbp's appearance in return, telling it looks like a fragile, scratch-prominent glass machine.
FYI, rmbp is just plain looking laptop. If you want those "looks" or "aesthetics", go for independent gaming laptop makers for their sleek looks. Especially considering the fact that rmbp definitely does not fit the look of "sexy". It just looks plain and simple, like HP ones.I didn't think I was being especially defensive, actually. I just find it perplexing that somebody would choose to pay a premium for an Apple laptop if the seamless integration of hardware design and UI were not a big part of the attraction. As everyone knows, they've never been class-leading performers 'under the hood'--battery life/portability of the MBA being an exception to the rule.
I think if you were to compare the amount of money and talent that go into R&D for an Apple laptop (which tend to have a shelf-life of 3-5 years) to the cost of developing a one-off/one-year Asus gaming notebook, you'd probably find a significant discrepancy. The fact that the Apple stuff winds up looking sexier and more refined/better designed is not an accident.
Anyway, yes, the Asus is ugly. It's a standard example of designing from the inside-out (i.e. establishing hardware specs/components and building a shell to house them) rather than the outside-in method Apple typically employs, which is more about establishing a physical relationship with the end user first and foremost, and then finding a way to integrate the internal components.
I'm not putting one design ethos above the other necessarily, but if you think that Asus notebook could wind up in a design museum 30 years from now, you're kidding yourself. It's about portability and gaming performance. End of story.
Moreover, note that having taste or an aesthetic sensibility and "knowing how to use a laptop effectively" aren't mutually exclusive. And the irony of finding the phrase "using a laptop effectively" in a thread about gaming performance is not lost on me. 😉
FYI, rmbp is just plain looking laptop. If you want those "looks" or "aesthetics", go for independent gaming laptop makers for their sleek looks. Especially considering the fact that rmbp definitely does not fit the look of "sexy". It just looks plain and simple, like HP ones.
If you think macbook pro is a nice looking laptop, then it's an established fact that you have never ever seen other laptops in the market.
😉