dr_lha said:I'll give you the RAZR, its a nice looking phone, but everything else motorola make looks like crap. As for the user interface, motorola have the worst user interface of any phone out there. Even people I know who love their RAZRs will admit that.
philmo said:Are you saying that if I get a Motorola E815 with Verizon I can't sync its calendar and adress book with iCal and the Mac address book? Or do they somehow block transfers of ringtones but allow syncing address books.
Either way, that sucks. I'm sure Verizon isn't going to offer a Kid Icarus theme ringtone. 🙂
dr_lha said:Question is, should you support a company that purposefully cripples its phones to try to make you use their expensive ringtones / picture downloads?
philmo said:I agree. I was just curious.
I'm all for voting with my dollars when it comes to supporting ethical companies. I'd be more than happy to buy a phone from another company if there existed a cell phone with the features that I want. 🙂
Mass Hysteria said:Nokia's head designer was escorted from the premises the other day he has just landed a job at apple apparantly . . . hmmmmmm
dr_lha said:Yes, I voted with my wallet after the V710 came out on Verizon. I really wanted a BT phone, but it was so crippled I switched over to AT+T and a SE T637, which does everything I need (works wonderfully with iSync through BT). Verizon used to be all about quality and service, but now they have become a large evil company, and I won't do business with them anymore.
That said, Cingular are getting just as bad.
Sometimes I think I should just give up and become a hermit. 😉
philmo said:I was a reasonably happy Verizon customer 2 years ago, but tempted by a good AT&T deal and a bad experience with the "help" at a Verizon store I switched. AT&T was okay, but seems to have really gone downhill when it was switched to Cingular. Now my calls get dropped at a ridiculous rate (I'd guess 4 times per hour of usage) and am very unhappy with their customer support.
Eh. Maybe I should look at T-Mobile instead. Or the hermit thing...
macam said:Why oh Why didn't Steve do some user research before he chose to partner with Motorola...
macam said:Woah hold on... are you saying that you actually like the Motorolas? You will be the first that I have met in a while!!!! 😉
Zzero0 said:Moto and Apple should take a clue from Nokia.
Hattig said:Why don't Apple simply release iTunes software for Symbian UIQ, Symbian S60 and whatever other phone operating systems there are? Then anyone can have iTunes on their phone.
electronboy said:You guys have it all wrong, this phone was the result of THREE companies working on the product. You conveniently left out Apple, who probably is to blame for the phone having a LAME 100 song limit.
They probably have aspirations of their own and saw this as a way to test the market without first bringing out their own product.
The ROKR is and will be a failure because Apple limited its functionality early on in the design process.
electronboy said:Then the phone would be become plain and unexciting like every other phone.
dr_lha said:As for the user interface, motorola have the worst user interface of any phone out there. Even people I know who love their RAZRs will admit that.
etracer said:Apple won't let iTunes work with a phone that can store 1000 songs. Doing so would cannibalize iPod sales. Part of Apple's philosophy with the ROKR was to limit it to 100 songs so everyone would see how much cellular phones suck as MP3 players and how much better the iPod is. This strategy certainly worked with the ROKR.
dr_lha said:I'll give you the RAZR, its a nice looking phone, but everything else motorola make looks like crap. As for the user interface, motorola have the worst user interface of any phone out there. Even people I know who love their RAZRs will admit that. Nokia have one of the clearest and best interfaces out there today, and its unified over their range of phones.
For the record, I own a Sony Ericcson phone myself, and in the past have owned Nokia, Samsung, Kyocera and Motorola phones. Nokia have by far the best UI out of all these phones. The Motorola phone I had had an interface so unusable it took me about 10 key presses to make a call from the phone book. RAZR is improved, but still lags behind both SE and Nokia (Nokia is the better of the two).
Not my experience, and clearly not the experience of many of the posters on here. Actually one of the "regular" people I know exchanged his RAZR because "Great phone, but I can't figure out how to use it", he got a Samsung instead and is very happy, despite the extra "chunkyness".madamimadam said:All the regular people (non-techos) that I've met that have a NEW Motorola say they are fantastic.
dr_lha said:Not my experience, and clearly not the experience of many of the posters on here. Actually one of the "regular" people I know exchanged his RAZR because "Great phone, but I can't figure out how to use it", he got a Samsung instead and is very happy, despite the extra "chunkyness".
dr_lha said:I'll give you the RAZR, its a nice looking phone, but everything else motorola make looks like crap. As for the user interface, motorola have the worst user interface of any phone out there. Even people I know who love their RAZRs will admit that. Nokia have one of the clearest and best interfaces out there today, and its unified over their range of phones.
For the record, I own a Sony Ericcson phone myself, and in the past have owned Nokia, Samsung, Kyocera and Motorola phones. Nokia have by far the best UI out of all these phones. The Motorola phone I had had an interface so unusable it took me about 10 key presses to make a call from the phone book. RAZR is improved, but still lags behind both SE and Nokia (Nokia is the better of the two).
Zzero0 said:iTunes is nice on the phone but the ROKR is just a phone with no style. The RAZR is perty sad on styling. Moto and Apple should take a clue from Nokia. Style and Functionality can be had in a phone at a reasonabl price. For functionality the N80 can't be beat. http://www.nokia.com/nseries/index.html?loc=inside,main_n80 For style the 8800 is very nice http://www.nokia8800.com/
What's wrong with flip phones?dr_lha said:Us haters of flip phones seem to have little choice these days. Personally I have a SE phone, which does everything I want (Bluetooth, Camera, non-flip phone, decent phone), however looking at the Cingular Store I see that they don't even sell a non-flip SE phone any more. In fact the only feature rich non-flip phone that isn't a PDA/Blackberry is the ROKR.
Everyone else the the world has decent choice in phones, why is the US so obsessed with flip-phones that you can't even get anything else any more?
T-Mobile has a 1 year contract, $39.99 for 600 minutes plus free nights and weekends or $49.99 for 1500 minutes plus free nights and weekends.dr_lha said:Yeah, I had that issue a few months ago with Cingular, the transistion period was pretty crappy. It seems to have cleared up now though, and I'm fairly happy again.
I'm definitely not as happy with Cingular as I was with AT&T though. AT&T did some sweet deals for employees of the Uni I work for, 1 year only contract with very cheap phones, 10% discount off service.
Cingular don't even seem to have heard of a "1 year contract" these days, its 2 years or nothing.
Don't even get me started on the whole "charging 10 cents for incoming SMSs" thing!
madamimadam said:Because Motorola's design hurts Motorola but pays Apple
Seems pretty simple
You not going to buy an iPod because you don't like a Motorola phone that has iTunes?
madamimadam said:Everyone I've met with the E398, which I'm lead to believe it pretty much the same as the phone in question but with no iTunes, thinks they are great expect for geeks who post on Apple forums.
madamimadam said:All the regular people (non-techos) that I've met that have a NEW Motorola say they are fantastic. The SE interface really has to be learnt because it is not user friendly. Someone like me who is a little more cluely on tech stuff can easily find my way around and work a SE phone but these phones should be made for the masses. Nokia is mostly quite good but I've been told that, again, for a regular person some of the features outside of make a call or send a message can be tricky to get to. On one of the phones I know someone who said they hated using Bluetooth because they had to go through too many menus. Now, there may be a shortcut for this but if the average person can not find it then it is hopeless.
madamimadam said:I must admit though, the Motorola interface only becomes easy when you switch the menu from icons to words and icons but on the plus side it offers you the customisation page as the first screen when you start up your phone for the first time.?
macam said:I think that's untrue - just because you're a techy person - doesn't mean that the people beneath you can't do stuff. I know complete technophobes who are able to pair a bluetooth headset for the first time (like my mum!) without any help and she has a nokia!
macam said:However you look at it - you have about twice as many clicks to do the simplist thing on a moto.
macam said:Sorry not trying to sound harsh here... just giving my 2 cents worth! Still can't believe you called me a geek tho!!!!!😀
haunebu said:You sir, are completely and utterly WRONG. Frank Nuovo has not left Nokia, nor is there any indication that he will.
(Jonathan Ive designs the pants off that guy anyway)
I'm not saying there's anything wrong with flip phones, I just personally don't like them, and would rather that phone companies would allow me to choose whether I want one or not, rather than having 25 flip phones and one low end regular phone.Tupring said:What's wrong with flip phones?
Yeah, I'm thinking when I switch thats who I'll go with. Both Verizon and Cingular give crappy deals now ($14 a month extra on a share plan to get nights starting from 7pm instead of 9pm? On AT&T 7pm nighhts were standard on my plan).Tupring said:T-Mobile has a 1 year contract, $39.99 for 600 minutes plus free nights and weekends or $49.99 for 1500 minutes plus free nights and weekends.