Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Time for Apple to catch up again. I had the iPhone 5, but got rid of it after using the Note II. Looks like BlackBerry and Samsung are ahead now.
 
Couldn't this be said about what BlackBerry is doing? They lack many of the apps that Apple and Android has but look where Apple started, who didn't have many of the capabilities and features that it now touts. Everybody started from the bottom up and built what the mobile world is like today. BlackBerry fell and is behind the curve on many things but to expect it to come out of the gate running with full-blown features is ridiculous.

I think a point to note is that QNX phones were supposed to be released early in 2012 - it was thus delayed for 1 year. If this was not delayed for so long your comments would definitely have merit. However, having had all this extra time I was hoping for more.

Let's see when this gets into the hands of users in Canada and the UK tomorrow and in the US next month or early March and subsequent reports.

Then we will see how well it has turned out. As I said in a previous post I was very enthusiastic about WP8 and the Nokia Lumia 920 and the HTC Windows Phone 8X. I then visited Windows Phone Central forums for a few months on a daily basis. I became disheartened, both in the software and the hardware - battery issues, Phones bricking and unable to be revived despite various tips being posted which worked for some, Wifi issues, etc etc.
 
I'm attracted to hardware first and I think this looks very nice.

From the front it looks like an upside-down Zune HD with a little iPhone thrown in. The back reminds me of the Nexus devices. In all, nice and clean design and way more classy than the SIII. I'd like it to be a bit thinner though.

I don't know about the OS, but looks functional enough. Still, I see nothing that'll challenge the big 2..
 
Yeah, using a gesture rather than home button is certainly "glitter".:D

Seriously, if Apple removed the home button and replaced it with a swipe and called it a "feature" this forum alone would be calling Apple's idea of a new feature, CRAP. But if another manufacturer does it, it's called "innovation". :cool:

Oh Please Louise! Prior to the launch of the Z10 today, there were a few threads where members felt that physical home buttons in general were getting old fashioned. The problem is software home buttons are even more lousy. Rim got it right with a swipe instead of a press. Once you learn the gestures to navigate its just a better solution than what we have now.

If Apple had released this first and got rid of the physical home button--I shouldn't need to tell you about all the people who would be raving about how awesome it is.

That being said, I'm not running out and replacing my iPhone 5 with a Z10. In many other respects, iOS is still better--just no glitter. :)
 
Waiting for the keyboard version first and then decide. The presentation was horrible. They were too focused on the unimportant stuff.
The biggest point for me is still the BB mail service and not the device. Apple can't match this.
 
blackberry-z10-piccompariso.jpg


Looks like the camera isn't very good either and BGR really didn't have nice things to say about the phone.

RIM prices have slipped 12% today due to the underwhelming launch.
 
lovely, a big plastic smart phone with a weird os, no app community, or ecosystem.

and the stock doubled from lows on rumors this was going to unhinge iphone and the androids, as if they ever had a chance, same story for nokia.

these are the phones uninformed people buy on impulse at the phone store, try so hard to like, but ultimately regret.
 
Like I said, biased sites including Engadget. This is a far better first attempt than iOS / Android / WP made. It is now down to the sales people to pitch the product and it's advantages. If the incentive is high enough ( good bonus for selling etc ) then I can see a fair few of these being sold.

The big question is how quickly can they move to squash the bugs picked up in the review, how quickly they can fill up the app store with good quality apps and finally if they can convince business to invest via contracts.

They're not competing with iOS 1.0 or Android 1.0. They're competing with iOS 6.1 and Android 4.2. The bar has moved up a little in 6 years.
 
I'm not sure what all the hate is on MR regarding the RIM announcement.

1)Blackberries are 95% owned by business people...NOT consumers. Therefore, there is no competition to Apple.

2)iPhones are 80% owned by consumers...NOT businesses. Sure, there are some companies that actually hand out/support iPhones, but the majority of businesses using smartphones are on Blackberry. Sure, the BB has not been very sexy over the past 2-3 years...but from a business point of view and use case (um you are supposed to be using it for business...not Youtube or Angry Birds etc), the BB line will probably flourish now that the BB is getting a makeover and really supporting touchscreen (their previous lines for years have supported touch screen...just not a lot of business justification for MORE touchscreen use/features 3 years ago).

3)Ecosystem complaints...um...again, it's work. BB users are using their phones for actual phone calls as well as email/calendaring which is rock solid in the BB world of business use. I really don't think anyone that owns a BB cares about not having 900,000 apps. Again, if you look at iPhone and it's target market (consumers), a very high percentage of the iPhone apps are non-business. Therefore, with BB being aimed at business users, a very high majority of the apps will be business apps...not alligator games.


Overall there is just no competition between the iPhone and BB...might as well chime in the people who still think Apple and Microsoft are competitors. If Apple ever alters the iPhone (security, pricing, integration, etc.) for businesses, sure...but Apple likely will never aim the iPhone at businesses.
 
That's actually not awful, and closer to what I always thought an "iPhone" would look like (years back before they existed).
 
Don't see this happening at that price.

If they want to these phones in peoples hands, they need to lower the cost.

Need a reason to lock into a 2 year contract with an untested OS.

lol the samsung galaxy III and the iphone 5 arent cheap phones either and blackberry isnt in the market to sell "cheap" phones
 
Unless BB10 is a complete rewrite it'll still continue to be a failure. Blackberry OS feels archaic compared to iOS and Android.

It IS a complete re-write. And while it's not perfect it truly multi-tasks, better virtual keyboard and nice gesturing and integration.

iOS could learn a lot from this. I wish Apple was a bit less arrogant and more creatively interested in iOS.
 
Hate to see the grandfather of smartphones die, but this is DOA. Might get some traction outside of the USA where BBM is still used a lot, but it was game over for them a long time ago. They let themselves slide until they crashed and burned. Now it's too little too late.

Nontheless, I'd like to get my hands on one just to see what took them so damn long! There has to be something worth seeing :D
 
Couldn't this be said about what BlackBerry is doing? They lack many of the apps that Apple and Android has but look where Apple started, who didn't have many of the capabilities and features that it now touts. Everybody started from the bottom up and built what the mobile world is like today. BlackBerry fell and is behind the curve on many things but to expect it to come out of the gate running with full-blown features is ridiculous.
Fair point. However, does Blackberry have the resources to catch up or surpass the current leaders? When the iPhone came out, it didn't have competitors.
 
Quite frankly, I'm getting tired of the mentality people have about new and existing mobile platforms. "Waa waa, iOS hasn't innovated enough. Waa waaaa, Blackberry is only playing catch up. Waaa waaaa, if company X doesn't innovate in some totally unrealistic way that I won't describe because I don't know what I want, then they'll just go bankrupt and everyone will buy Y device instead. Because if I say 'innovation' enough times, I'll convince myself that I know what it really means."

Sorry, that's not the way reality works. People might think they want to be wowed year after year, but hopping from device to device doesn't work in the long run for people who actually use their devices for real things. having to switch platforms, transfer data, relearn your workflow and figure out AGAIn how make your shiny new device useful to you really becomes a time waster when you have work to do. Those are the people who Blackberry is catering to, and even to an extent Apple.

And this is why BOTH platforms are going to continually evolve for the foreseeable future, not radically change every six months just to appease a bunch of forum "experts," with nothing but a case of cell phone ADHD and their keyboards to keep them company.

Exactly! Been saying that for a few years, but not as well. Thank you.

Most people on these forums do not represent the "average user." The average user doesn't upgrade their phone (tab, computer, etc) every year. The average user doesn't piss and moan about what features competing products have versus their own. The average user doesn't say to his friend "My iPhone is better than your POS Android because..." or vice versa.
 
Looks pretty good to me, and much much better than I expected. I actually think it might succeed, I know a LOT of people who are committed BB users and have been waiting for something that is roughly equivalent to iPhone/Android and this isn't far off. Plus, do not underestimate the volume of business's that issue Blackberry's as work phones. Entirely anecdotal, but in the UK I don't know anyone with a work issued iPhone, but BB's are everywhere.

Good luck to 'em I say.


People might think they want to be wowed year after year, but hopping from device to device doesn't work in the long run for people who actually use their devices for real things. having to switch platforms, transfer data, relearn your workflow and figure out AGAIn how make your shiny new device useful to you really becomes a time waster when you have work to do. Those are the people who Blackberry is catering to, and even to an extent Apple.

And this is why BOTH platforms are going to continually evolve for the foreseeable future, not radically change every six months just to appease a bunch of forum "experts," with nothing but a case of cell phone ADHD and their keyboards to keep them company.

I also wholeheartedly agree with this. Here and other forums are populated by phone hobbyists, while the indescribably vast majority get something they like, stick with it, and barely notice whether it receives an update before their contract is up. Change for the sake of change is definitely peculiar to forum goers and hobbyists, the masses baulk at unnecessary upheaval.
 
Last edited:
Too little too late

If BB is trying to cater to businesses still, they are doing a terrible job. Current BES servers will NOT support the new BB 10 OS. Either businesses will need to replace ALL their devices at once, or run two servers until everyone is running BB OS 10. Why go through all that trouble when it is easier to move to iOS, Android or WP 8? I think that is where 'Blackberry' really shot themselves in the foot, at least in terms of trying to mount a comeback.
 
It's put up or shut up time for Apple. Create the world's most advanced mobile OS, just don't say you did.

RIM just massively one-upped iOS today, even if the platform doesn't survive a company worth 61 times less then Apple just out Appled Apple. Better keyboard, better camera, better multi-tasking and arguably better design cues then the iPhone.

Basically Apple is now in the state RIM was 4 years ago and making the same mistakes. RIM had almost 50% WORLD market share in 2008 but choose to be arrogant, ignored consumer trends, and stopped investing money into their platform, and nearly died because of it. RIM went from nearly $150 a share to $5 and 1% market share in only 4 years.

Apple likes to say a lot of things, but they need to start showing they are capable of what they claim.

Regardless of what you think about the new BB 10 platform, what RIM accomplished after a few short highly-focused years simply puts Apple to shame.
This has GOT to be a troll post. I don't even know where to begin.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.