Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Wouldn't it be interesting if someone goes round with a camera, asking these chavs why they're protesting. I bet none of them could answer why the original protests started.

Either that or the answers they get aren't softened enough. [link]

Funniest interview ever on Sky. Female Sky reporter interviewing a white guy who has had his shops burned. He said to her , the arsonists/looters were all black. She said to him , you can’t say that , there must have been white guys there as well. He thought about and then said , ok they were not all black , i was the only white guy there. Is that ok to say ?
This guy states this with a totally dead pan face without a hint of the pc faux pas.
She again corrects him and states nervously you just cant say they were all black , he responds , but they were i was there.
Unbelievable. The interview describes the state of our society in a nut shell.
 
Went out to Manchester today (for legal shopping, not looting) the whole place is in a really nice state. There's a good atmosphere too. A few shops boarded up, some preemptively.

Glad the rain came and washed them all away though.
 
I think here in the UK we're all going to have a think about how we approach things in the future. A lots of things have failed here in the UK in the past few years. Peter Oborne has a good article in, strangely of all papers, the Telegraph.
 
I think here in the UK we're all going to have a think about how we approach things in the future. A lots of things have failed here in the UK in the past few years. Peter Oborne has a good article in, strangely of all papers, the Telegraph.

Credit where it is due. While I like the Guardian, that is a very good and thought-provoking article, and is all the better indeed, for coming from the Telegraph. Thanks for posting it.
 
Last edited:
The Telegraph article is a good summation. Most people do not have the means to flaunt the law without repercussion the way that the rich and powerful routinely do.
 
I think you probably mean "flout" rather than "flaunt", but otherwise I agree absolutely. ;)

I suppose I could argue that the rich and powerful both flaunt and flout authority, but that would be a cover-up. ;)

Seven years of university education so far, but you wouldn't be able to tell based on my writing here...:eek:
 
From the 'Nick Clegg looking sad' blog:

tumblr_lp79tkOvwz1qjjck0o1_400.jpg


Nick Clegg got told to mind a friend’s house while he was on holiday, but someone came and smashed all the windows and set the garage on fire and took the cat and now Nick is shaking in a corner while everyone else has to deal with it.

http://twitter.com/SadNickClegg
 
Please tell me this is a legitimate consumer who suddenly had a need for five flat screen tellies and not some dufus who left a open invitation outside their house for plod to kick their door in (it's leafy Herne Hill not Brixton by the way)(sorry photoy is upside down):
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0038.jpg
    IMG_0038.jpg
    547.3 KB · Views: 76
It was bothering me, OK.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0038.jpg
    IMG_0038.jpg
    47.6 KB · Views: 243
Just as an add on if anybody identifies the house as the corner of Fawnbrake Avenue and Poplar Walk in SE2 I can assure you the people who live there are very nice and middle class and in no way connected to the scum from Brixton who no doubt dumped the packaging there in the hope of putting plod off the trail.:D

(thanks rdowns)
 
Just as an add on if anybody identifies the house as the corner of Fawnbrake Avenue and Poplar Walk in SE2 I can assure you the people who live there are very nice and middle class and in no way connected to the scum from Brixton who no doubt dumped the packaging there in the hope of putting plod off the trail.:D

(thanks rdowns)

your house, eh? :p
 
While I think it's important to uncover any police wrongdoing and the wrongdoing of some of the rioters, I hope London gets to rebuilding and also trying to root out why the rioters were so mad in the first place.

If this is to be compared to the anger the young people had against Thatcher in the 1980s and the riots that happened then, and the liberal revolution that followed in reaction against her in the following decade, let's see what happened this time.

Just listening to Americans talk about what they see besides the mindless rioting is the hopelessness of the youth in this recession and direct finger pointing to the PM.

As what may happen in Philadelphia and other major American cities, a riot can happen in the states for some of the same reasons and Obama, Congress, and unemployment can be hot topic issues for a riot in the US.

There's all this talk about 2012 and all, whether it's from liberals or conservatives politics, and while a lot of the "big change" prophecies about everything in general are a bunch of hogwash, a lot of events will happen as a self-fulfilling prophecy. 2012 sounds like a great time for change, or actually right now through the next year socially, politically, and personally. At the very least, even people who don't believe in any major prophecies may add a little extra effort into doing what they are already as a reaction to 2012 and the hype. I am hoping for an end to the slow growth of the economy and for a substantial increase in the economy to happen next year. The Fed keeps interest rates low into 2013 believing 2012 will be more of the same sluggishness in the economy with little change from where we are now. Well, that's all ranting for another topic. :)

Before London is rebuilt where it was damaged, it's likely somebody in a high place in London will resign or get replaced. The press may blame England for a lot of things and how this set of riots was handled, but it's a lot better than how American riots are handled. A heavy handed police approach, as what usually happens in the states, often ends up with more problems. The riots basically burnt themselves out and in the long run, more businesses and lives stayed safe. I am glad the UK didn't bring in troops.
 
While I think it's important to uncover any police wrongdoing and the wrongdoing of some of the rioters, I hope London gets to rebuilding and also trying to root out why the rioters were so mad in the first place.

Et tu, Brute?? Some of the rioters?? Please!!!

The rioters were, in the main, greedy bastards, thinking they could get away with mayhem as part of a large mob.
 
Et tu, Brute?? Some of the rioters?? Please!!!

The rioters were, in the main, greedy bastards, thinking they could get away with mayhem as part of a large mob.

Whatever the case of who did what, I hope the authorities go on to capture as many as the perps as possible, no matter how long it takes. It was definitely awful to see so many take advantage of the situation.

Time will only tell though on whether the cops initially acted correctly in the shooting. The early reports I saw suggested that the person shot was an alleged gangster but had the US press had few details and never mentioned any crimes he may have been involved in.

That may be the case that the cops had good information and were correct in apprehending the suspcet, but when gangsters get shot in the US, I don't see a whole bunch of protesters outside of the police station. Something stinks here but that still does not excuse the actions of the rioters, but that's a separate set of crimes.

My hope is that the police can truly show they did not use excessive force and they were in the right and not just acting like state sanctioned thugs in uniforms. While most of the rioters went shopping, don't you think there was some legitimate outrage in London?
 
Time will only tell though on whether the cops initially acted correctly in the shooting.

Riot cops over here have taken to wearing smart phones around their necks, to see/hear what they do.

Would something like this satisfy you, as to whether or not he pulled a gun, or discharged it??
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.