Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
This is my number one complaint about my Tesla. CarPlay is just better. Apple Maps is better. I wish I had the choice, but oh well.
Agreed!

In my Model Y, Tesla’s navigation and car functions are awesome. But the connectivity for texting is absolutely horrific. Phone calls are slightly better.

There is no reason why CarPlau can’t be offered in all cars with various degrees of capability.
 
I use CarPlay for all of this stuff on a nearly daily basis. I can't image not having it in my car, and will never own a car without it:
• Navigate to recent locations that I searched for on my phone.
• Navigate to locations in upcoming calendar events.
• Navigate to a friend's current location.
• Be notified about upcoming police activity on the road.
• Use Waze if I want to.
• Have full access to my Apple Music library via voice control.
• Play my recent podcasts, and keep them in sync with podcasts on my phone.
• Send and receive messages easily using my voice.
• Hear about my upcoming calendar events.
• Create new calendar events.
• Create reminders while driving.
• See an indicator on the screen that shows that my garage door is closed (for my OCD about closing the door.)
• Have the same user interface that I'm used to in my other vehicles and rental cars.
 
renting a car is really going to suck.

This is an under-appreciated point. For people who have to rent a lot of cars (because they travel for work, for example) and more likely than not end up with a different brand and model every week, it really really really sucks having to get used to yet another system every time. With Carplay/AA, you are able to use what you already know. At the end of the day, it's almost a safety consideration as well, I really want the tourist in his rental to focus on the frigging road instead of playing around with the system trying to figure everything out (I live in a tourist destination and it's already bad enough).

Not implementing Carplay/AA at this point is shortsighted and arrogant.
 
I'm sorry but CarPlay is not better than Tesla's own. Tesla's is by far the most advanced UI out there. Apple isn't even close.


This is my number one complaint about my Tesla. CarPlay is just better. Apple Maps is better. I wish I had the choice, but oh well.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Kr0019
I get why companies do that. Even Apple does it and doesn’t allow other companies OS to take over their hardware. But from a consumer perspective. It is too comfortable to have an all in one device which connects you to everything and you can control everything from that device instead of logging in on different devices/screens and create multiple accounts. Apple wouldn’t had this problem if Tim didn’t pull the plug on the Apple Car. He probably did it because of margins. I hope in the future with a more hardware focused CEO we will get the Apple car eventually.
 


On the latest episode of The Verge's Decoder podcast, Rivian CEO RJ Scaringe told guest host Joanna Stern why the EV maker continues to pass on Apple's CarPlay — both the standard version and the more advanced CarPlay Ultra.

CarPlay-Liquid-Glass-Light.jpg

Echoing his previous comments on the matter, Scaringe said Rivian is focused on offering a "seamless digital experience," where customers do not need to switch between its own software and CarPlay. Instead, he said Rivian prefers to provide an à-la-carte selection of built-in apps, such as Apple Music, Google Maps, Spotify, and YouTube.

Scaringe said he is "very confident" in Rivian's decision to skip CarPlay, especially as it plans to integrate AI into its vehicles over the next 18 months. For example, he said Rivian is planning a native AI-powered voice-to-text feature for messaging.

"We're really convicted on this," he said.

Nevertheless, Scaringe acknowledged that some customers will not purchase a Rivian given the lack of CarPlay. "We accept that," he said.

"Some of those decisions not everyone's going to agree with," he said. "That's okay."



Article Link: Rivian CEO Doubles Down on Decision to Not Offer Apple CarPlay
The massive flaw of this strategy is SYNCING. It's absolutely horrible to listen to a podcast in your car, and then once you reach your destination and leave the car, you want to pick up where you left off, BUT it hasn't SYNCED with my iPhone.. I literally have to go to the spotify app on my iPhone, and pause the podcast in the app, then leave the car ALWAYS just to make sure it picks up at the same second I left it in the car.

With Apple Carplay, you don't have to worry about that because it's literally mirroring exactly what you do on the phone with the car. SO you're always in SYNC.
 
Unpopular take: I think there’s a streak of entitlement among iPhone users who demand CarPlay be universal, as if automakers owe Apple their dashboards. Automakers are right to protect their platforms, data, safety approach, and subscription roadmaps; GM’s move to drop CarPlay/Android Auto in EVs shows how control and safety narratives drive these decisions, even when it angers buyers. If Apple truly wanted mass-market control over in-car software, it would own the stack—but Apple canceled its decade-long car effort, and CarPlay’s next-gen push has met resistance from major brands, which underlines why manufacturers won’t just hand over the UI to Cupertino
 
  • Disagree
  • Like
Reactions: Stewie and MilaM
Rivian wants their software to be perfectly integrated with their hardware. They are no different from Apple in that regard.

Why let the phone people tell you what Car UX should be like?
CarPlay doesn't tell you what car ux you should have, it's a simple choice. If Rivian's is superior, it will win out, no? Apple allows all kinds of apps on their devices. All of google services, Microsoft services, Spotify, shall I go on? Why should I be forced to subscribe to services via a closed system for things that I already use elsewhere? Both iOS and Android OS let you migrate everything across if you switch platforms, for free. Data is like gold and these greedy companies just want to mine it for profit. At least Apple offers you the choice on what you want on your device, does Rivian? Your analogy is flawed.
 
Last edited:
Unpopular take...

That's a reasonable take. Ultimately the consumer decides which vehicle best suits their needs. I find CarPlay/Android Auto to be superior to anything from automakers and not locked into hardware for X years that I choose to own that vehicle. Therefore any brand that doesn't offer these integrations - GM, Tesla, Rivian, etc - are automatically off my shopping list. Free market, baby.
 
I like how some of the posts think that if they navigate on CarPlay, the car cant know your destination because it's on the phone.

Umm - it absolutely can know. My F150 Lightning knows my route when I use apple maps.
 
Unpopular take: I think there’s a streak of entitlement among iPhone users who demand CarPlay be universal, as if automakers owe Apple their dashboards. Automakers are right to protect their platforms, data, safety approach, and subscription roadmaps; GM’s move to drop CarPlay/Android Auto in EVs shows how control and safety narratives drive these decisions, even when it angers buyers. If Apple truly wanted mass-market control over in-car software, it would own the stack—but Apple canceled its decade-long car effort, and CarPlay’s next-gen push has met resistance from major brands, which underlines why manufacturers won’t just hand over the UI to Cupertino
And when it's time for that in house system to be updated you don't think it'll be part of your next service charge? Good luck when new roads are constructed and your in house GPS needs a maps update. CarPlay is simply a passthrough mirror, not a takeover of a manufacturers system.
 
Unpopular take: I think there’s a streak of entitlement among iPhone users who demand CarPlay be universal, as if automakers owe Apple their dashboards. Automakers are right to protect their platforms, data, safety approach, and subscription roadmaps; GM’s move to drop CarPlay/Android Auto in EVs shows how control and safety narratives drive these decisions, even when it angers buyers. If Apple truly wanted mass-market control over in-car software, it would own the stack—but Apple canceled its decade-long car effort, and CarPlay’s next-gen push has met resistance from major brands, which underlines why manufacturers won’t just hand over the UI to Cupertino
It's not entitlement. I just know what I want as a consumer, and it's called CarPlay.
 
And when it's time for that in house system to be updated you don't think it'll be part of your next service charge? Good luck when new roads are constructed and your in house GPS needs a maps update. CarPlay is simply a passthrough mirror, not a takeover of a manufacturers system.
Totally fair that OEM systems need updates—and those can get bundled into service or paid map refreshes depending on the brand. That’s exactly why many drivers prefer phone‑based nav: Maps, Waze, and music apps update on the iPhone without waiting for dealer firmware. Also, classic CarPlay is mostly an app projection layer, so it doesn’t ‘take over’ the car; the deeper stuff people worry about is the new CarPlay Ultra, which only goes beyond projection if the automaker opts in. That’s why some brands are pushing back, while others like Aston Martin are embracing it. So it really is a trade‑off: OEM control and integrated services vs. faster app cadence and familiarity—both valid approaches
 
It's not entitlement. I just know what I want as a consumer, and it's called CarPlay.
Totally fair—knowing what a consumer wants isn’t entitlement; the debate is about whether automakers should be required to offer it versus retaining control over their own software and data, and that’s where opinions split
 
Easy enough. I am a potential buyer of a Rivian-type pickup, and I simply will not waste time checking out the Rivians when I upgrade.

Rivian's reason is obviously because they intend to monetize any data streaming to and from their vehicles.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Biro
VW bought Rivian software not long ago... BMW and its brands have an upcoming version of their software that will be pretty great with a panoramic display. Tesla has its own software / hardware so vertically integrated that's pretty hard to beat. Others will eventually catch up.

Vehicle brands are starting to wake up and realize how crappy it is to outsource everything when it comes to electronics.

Apple missed the boat. Forest for the trees on this one.

All the downvotes are coming from people who have no clue what vertical integration vs outsourcing looks like in the auto business. Literally group think. How's that new iPhone treating ya? The one you get every single year to show it off to your friends?
I drive a Tesla. Their interface is sleak. The kind that's as beautiful as it's dumb. This might be the reason why I might eventually switch to another brand. Oh, and by the way, most Teslas have a landscape screen, not vertical.
 
" We're really convicted on this"

I hope that's not prophetic - (Map data stealing, App UI cloning, User habit siphoning, etc.).
 
VW bought Rivian software not long ago... BMW and its brands have an upcoming version of their software that will be pretty great with a panoramic display. Tesla has its own software / hardware so vertically integrated that's pretty hard to beat. Others will eventually catch up.

Vehicle brands are starting to wake up and realize how crappy it is to outsource everything when it comes to electronics.

Apple missed the boat. Forest for the trees on this one.

All the downvotes are coming from people who have no clue what vertical integration vs outsourcing looks like in the auto business. Literally group think. How's that new iPhone treating ya? The one you get every single year to show it off to your friends?
You sound better than you look!
 
Easy enough. I am a potential buyer of a Rivian-type pickup, and I simply will not waste time checking out the Rivians when I upgrade.

Rivian's reason is obviously because they intend to monetize any data streaming to and from their vehicles.
Tesla gives you satellite view, Tune in and Spotify/Apple music compatibility (not to be confused with an actual subscription, you'd have to pay for that too) for a mere 15 bucks a month. Did you say monetization ?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.