Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
67,643
38,073


Electric automaker Rivian has no plans to introduce support for Apple CarPlay in its vehicles, founder and CEO RJ Scaringe says.

Next-Generation-CarPlay-Design-WWDC-2024-7.jpeg

The company's stance was explained in a recent interview with The Verge's Nilay Patel on the "Decoder" podcast. Scaringe emphasized that Rivian's desire to create a seamless and well-integrated digital experience is the primary reason for not adopting CarPlay. He likened the decision to Apple choosing to develop iOS and macOS instead of using Microsoft's Windows operating system, stating, "There is a reason that ironically is very consistent with Apple ethos for us to want to control the ecosystem."

Apple CarPlay was introduced in 2014 and allows iPhone users to mirror some of their phone's features on a car's infotainment system, providing access to Siri, navigation, and some apps in a familiar interface. It has become a popular feature in many vehicles, with a significant number of consumers considering it a critical factor in purchasing decisions.

Rivian's rejection of CarPlay stems from a desire to maintain control over the entire user experience within its vehicles. Scaringe highlighted that CarPlay's inability to "leverage other parts of the vehicle experience" would necessitate users to exit the app for certain functions, such as opening the front trunk. He explained, "We have taken the view of the digital experience in the vehicle wants to feel consistent and holistically harmonious across every touchpoint."

The decision to exclude CarPlay is seen as part of Rivian's broader strategy to control the "digital real estate" within its vehicles. Scaringe stated, "We just believe that it is such an important piece of real estate, the digital ecosystem, that it was something we want to retain."

He also acknowledged customer feedback regarding the current shortcomings in Rivian's mapping and navigation systems, an area where CarPlay excels. He noted that Rivian is actively working on improvements, facilitated by the company's acquisition of route planning app maker Iternio.

Despite not supporting CarPlay, Rivian plans to incorporate many of its desirable features on an "à la carte basis." The company has already integrated Apple Music with Spatial Audio support. Scaringe expressed his admiration for Apple's products and reiterated the strong relationship between the two companies. However, he emphasized the importance of consistency and control in delivering a "pure product experience" for Rivian customers.

The absence of CarPlay in Rivian's vehicles is not unique in the automotive industry. Tesla has never adopted the feature, and General Motors recently decided to drop support for CarPlay and Android Auto in its future electric vehicle models. In contrast, luxury brands like Porsche and Aston Martin are set to adopt the next-generation CarPlay experience.

Article Link: Rivian CEO Explains Why Apple CarPlay Won't Come to Its Vehicles
 
Never heard of that car brand and without CarPlay / Android Car it would not be on my radar anyway.

Edit: nvm its the one with iJustine on the payroll
They make mainly trucks (that can't really do truck things because the range isn't that good.) Never understood the hype behind EV trucks that can't even be used as a truck. Then again I guess these are for the yuppies who want to say "see I have an EV AND its a truck."
 
Scaringe's argument is sound. I drive a Tesla and even though I'm a big Apple fan, I don't mind not having Apple Car Play. The key is offering software good enough not to miss it. Tesla has done it, maybe Rivian can too. From what I understand, GM isn't even close.
I drive a Tesla and I got sick, after 3 years, of not having a big screen where I can use my iPhone. Just replace the effing google maps with a CarPlay screen and keep the rest, if necessary. Not paying for connectivity subscription till it's coming.
 
Cool. They can do whatever they like, of course.

Personally, I prefer options. I’m not interested in buying a car that doesn’t give me the option of using Apple CarPlay. It’s the ecosystem I’ve chosen, and it’s one which works for me.

I believe how we interact with tech is just as important as the capabilities of that tech. How one prefers to interact with tech is purely subjective, so the option to use a familiar UX is crucial when buying something as expensive and long-lasting as a vehicle.

I like Rivian, but so long as they insist on proprietary UX in their vehicles, I’m out - same for GM and Tesla.

We all have deal breakers, and this is one of mine.
 
It is getting dumber and dumber like I need to TOUCH 3 different menus to adjust my damn fan speed on my company car and occasionally I am presented with a "the air condition menu is not available at the moment"
even worse is that on my EQS, now it happened to me twice when its very cold that the touch screen not to work until the car is warm enough !! its like old days when the iphone display didnt worked or shuts down under 0C !!
 
I appreciate all these car companies deciding to take their names off my list of possible purchases! It makes the car shopping experience a lot easier.

/s (if actually needed)

Really though, I just don’t even bother looking at a vehicle that doesn’t support CarPlay. It’s a must have for me.
 
His comment really misses a huge portion of what makes Carplay what it is. Yes, it's nice to improve the interface of a crappy infotainment system and yes, it can actually make a great interface look worse. But the real utility is that you are taking your driving preferences with you everywhere you go. You don't need to pay subscriptions outside of what you already have. You don't need to upgrade the modem in the car when 4G or 5G are deprecated. You don't need the manufacturer to constantly develop and improve apps that already exist on other platforms. You aren't limited by the apps the manufacturer thinks you should want. You aren't limited by apps the publisher/service allows the manufacturer to develop. And if that manufacturer should go out of business, you don't have to worry about losing support for all of those apps.

Rivian is really going to dig themselves into a corner with this decision, and they should be looking at Lucid instead of Tesla for direction.
 
Scaringe's argument is sound. I drive a Tesla and even though I'm a big Apple fan, I don't mind not having Apple Car Play. The key is offering software good enough not to miss it. Tesla has done it, maybe Rivian can too. From what I understand, GM isn't even close.
I drive a Tesla and won't be buying one in the future purely due to the lack of CarPlay. I really don't like the Tesla interface at all. At least they finally added Music.
 
I might be a little different, but I prefer having my iPhone mounted in my car and use that for maps and calls go over bluetooth. I don't use car play in my car because I feel restricted. Its like having two monitors on your computer instead of one. Plus, CarPlay doesn't allow certain things to work.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.