How come the 768GB SSD on the rMBP only have 750GB usable space? What happened to the other 18GB?
Last edited:
The Mac OS X operating system, system files and included apps take some space.
That doesn't account for the fact that the drive is 750 gigabytes unformatted. The formatting and recovery partition take up much less than 1 GB of space - a far cry from the 18 GB that's missing. The 768 GB "flash storage" module has the same unformatted capacity as a 750 gigabyte hard drive, so Apple should advertise it as a 750 gigabyte drive.The Mac OS X operating system, system files and included apps take some space.
Apple - MacBook Pro with Retina display - Technical SpecificationsI mean the entire "Macintosh HD" is 750GB.
Why don't you file a class-action lawsuit about it? Seriously, it's not a big deal.so Apple should advertise it as a 750 gigabyte drive.
Not everyone has the time to call lawyers up just to file class actions randomly... You're losing anywhere from 6 GB to 18 GB of space depending on what machine you get, and this can be a significant difference that is NOT reflected before you buy the machine.Why don't you file a class-action lawsuit about it? Seriously, it's not a big deal.
A 2% difference is, by most reasonable people's definition, not "significant". You should maintain far more than that in free space on any drive. It's not worth getting bent out of shape about. It is what it is. Ranting about it won't change a thing.d this can be a significant difference that is NOT reflected before you buy the machine.
Not everyone has the time to call lawyers up just to file class actions randomly... You're losing anywhere from 6 GB to 18 GB of space depending on what machine you get, and this can be a significant difference that is NOT reflected before you buy the machine.
If you're basing a buying decision solely on a 2% difference in storage capacity, your purchasing criteria is seriously flawed. You should keep at least 10% storage space free, anyway.+1 yea, the significant difference may reflect people decision to choose their rMBP configuration.
+1 yea, the significant difference may reflect people decision to choose their rMBP configuration.
you're not going to be swayed by a small % less storage space.
I wonder why SSD's loses so much space after formatting compare to standard hard drives.
[sarcasm]What's the sarcasm font on this forum again?[/sarcasm]What's the sarcasm font on this forum again?
[sarcasm]What's the sarcasm font on this forum again?[/sarcasm]
What's the sarcasm font on this forum again? (LOL! it worked!)
OK I plugged in my Seagate 500GB HHD and only 465.76GB are available. Can I get a refund for the 34.24GB that was robbed from me?![]()
What's the sarcasm font on this forum again?
----------
See post number 18 ^^ and do you have another Hard drive that does better? I find it hard to believe. I've never seen any type of hard drive or portable media do much better percentage wise.
----------
My 2007 Honda CBR600RR was advertised as a 600cc engine, but I recently found it it's only 599cc. Should I start a class action lawsuit?
Ok. As I've mentioned above, I'm just curious. Not here to rant or anything.
The WD 750GB HD in my Mac Mini has actual space of 749GB. My WD external 1TB's actual space is 1TB. I know the actual space will certainly be different than advertised. This is my first SSD, so I was just wondering why the difference in actual space and advertised space is much more significant than standard HD's. It's no big deal to me, just curious.
I have a brand new 256GB samsung SSD sitting on my desk right now that I just got yesterday. I haven't put anything on it yet, but there is only 238.47GB available. That's 17.53GB wasted on formatting. Maybe I should sue samsung for selling me a 238.47GB drive.![]()
- That's because to Windows 1 GB is 1024 MB, which is 1024 KB, which is 1024 Bytes. OS X uses the same way of calculating as hard drive/SSD manufacturers, where 1 GB is 1000 MB and so on.Do you have screen shots? Maybe it's different in a MAC as opposed to windows, but I have several hard drives around me. I have at least three 80GB, a 120, 256, 320 and two 500 HHD drives, and one 256 SSD drive and they all have several GBs less than what's advertised. I've been working in IT for years (windows side) and this is extremely normal.
- Is that in Windows or OS X? They differ in how they calculate gigabytes. My 256 GB Samsung 830 shows up as 256.06 GB in Disk Utility with its partition being 255.2 GB. That's fairly accurate, I'd say.
- That's because to Windows 1 GB is 1024 MB, which is 1024 KB, which is 1024 Bytes. OS X uses the same way of calculating as hard drive/SSD manufacturers, where 1 GB is 1000 MB and so on.
Are you sure manufacturers are using 1000MB as 1GB? If they are then I'd say someone could have a lawsuit. Can you provide a link where you got that info?