I love my Apple TV, but I wish that there were more channels that did not require a cable provider. Does Roku require a cable provider for many of their channels? Because for only $50 it may be worth buying this item.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Roku Takes Aim at Chromecast and Apple TV With $49 Streaming Stick
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
What these pictures leave out is that you still have to find a place to plug this in for power. Wall plug or USB port on your tv. Assuming the Chromestick is the same.
I had forgotten until last night. This is because of jailbreaking, right? If I have the latest updates, can I still jailbreak it? If so, might head to the Apple Store at lunch.
Thank you! I am going to try this out today. Hopefully I see some positive results!
I just wish the Roku could play .mkv's natively... or, well, maybe their newer ones do, but mine doesn't
Yup. I have my Roku3 set up with ethernet specifically to get the best possible streaming, and I've been quite pleased. Even my non-techy wife says the Roku is the best device in the house.
Roku3 supports NF profiles and Youtube, Roku says other models may get those features but have been vague about dates and even about whether it will actually happen.
It's possible that it's all on Netflix's end. But even if that's the case, Netflix is a selling point for Roku and vice versa. If it is out of Roku's hands, they still must have a business relationship with NF and should be able to put some pressure to make it happen. But I have read some comments on the Roku blog and those made it sound like they may support it but it's on the bottom of their to-do list.
Where? The only dates I have seen were "2014" and just that they would try, no promise of support for any models below the 3.
It's possible that it's all on Netflix's end. But even if that's the case, Netflix is a selling point for Roku and vice versa. If it is out of Roku's hands, they still must have a business relationship with NF and should be able to put some pressure to make it happen. But I have read some comments on the Roku blog and those made it sound like they may support it but it's on the bottom of their to-do list.
Where? The only dates I have seen were "2014" and just that they would try, no promise of support for any models below the 3.
Roku has more non-cable channels than AppleTV, but also, many of them are the same and require a cable provider.
Still not completely sure why I would pay for this?
I can connect laptop/iPhone and stream whatever I want.
I can connect laptop/iPhone and stream whatever I want.
I completely agree the UI for Plex on Roku is awful. But certain Plex channels, for some reason, work much better on Roku, such as The Daily Show and Colbert Report. I have both a Mac Mini HTPC running Plex and a Roku 3 on my TV, and 9 times out of 10 I use the Roku. FF/RW works better for streaming content on the Roku, and overall it is more stable. The one big exception is if I am watching my own movies from my Plex Server. Direct play has lots of trouble on Roku in my experience. I otherwise love my Roku. Love the RF remote, love the headphone port on the remote.
I hope Apple follow suit with the design of the next gen AppleTV. At least that would be one less box sitting under my TV given that I mostly watch TV through the internet now.
Who knows if they add a few more apps like iPlayer & SkyGo, added a PVR for the other stuff and added games, I could probably do away with all the other boxes under there to. Maybe we'll have to wait for an actual Apple television set for that to happen.
Who knows if they add a few more apps like iPlayer & SkyGo, added a PVR for the other stuff and added games, I could probably do away with all the other boxes under there to. Maybe we'll have to wait for an actual Apple television set for that to happen.
Well frankly, it's no different than having to plug anything else into your TV that's hanging on the wall. Actually, it's easier because there are usually recesses where the HDMI plugs are, and since power comes from USB (assuming your TV has it), no cords have to come out from behind your TV.
My bigger concern in this scenario would be interference. But I've not used Chromecast or similar to see if there are interference issues.
Like I said in a post above yours, they added it for the 3 but still haven't for any of the other models months later.
Its called Seasonpass from Firecore. It downgrades to 5.3, and then jailbreaks. Its wicked easy.
http://support.firecore.com/entries/387605-Jailbreaking-101-Seas0nPass
Thanks! I found that earlier. All set with NitoTV and XBMC. Going to list it tonight and order one from Apple! Thanks for the help!
Selling old Apple TV 2 boxes for $200?! What, just because it can be jailbroken? I don't understand... please explain if you would be so kind.
Yes it is because of jailbreaking.....
Not like either company needs to take aim @ Chromecast, it's a POS it can't do half of what ATV or Roku can do
So within 5 minutes of my listing going up, I had a bid meet my reserve, so I know, worst case, the Apple TV 3,2 I ordered today will be paid for.
Since it still has 2 days, 23 hours, and 30 minutes left? Looks like I'll have enough left over for the Apple TV 4,1 when it comes out. So thanks to you and the others for the tips!Selling old Apple TV 2 boxes for $200?! What, just because it can be jailbroken? I don't understand... please explain if you would be so kind.
Lots more apps. Some live cable channels, XBMC, ability to use a network drive for media, etc. seems cool. Not something I will do, but since the six I watched today on eBay all went for over $200? Was worth the hour of my time to jailbreak it and list on eBay.
So Roku had not "taken aim" before the announcement of the stick? does a streaming box not "take aim" at an Apple TV. The Apple TV is not a stick, its a box. I understand that this stick roku came out with is a direct attempt to compete head to head with chromecast. I could see them saying "Roku Takes Aim at Chromecast With $49 Streaming Stick". That would be a true statement. But since they added the Apple TV, which is not a stick, it changes the argument from roku is taking aim at streaming STICKS to all streaming DEVICES.
Now I know this is Macrumors so the title has to relate to Apple somehow and that that is why they put it in there. I am just being nitpicky for the sake of being nitpicky.