Nice! I remember meeting Tony Fadell 10+ years ago and asked him if Apple would ever release higher resolution audio and devices. He told me there wasn’t a market for it and people were fine with lossy audio. 👍🏼
They won’t be, the codec most likely will be lossless.Hopefully they are airtags compatible
Unless I’m missing something…you do not have an option currently for Apple Music it’s just one level. If I’m mistaken Mind telling me where I’m missing it?Apple Music already has such an option. (I think it currently toggles between 128k and 256k bitrates)
I wouldn't be surprised if they'd add a lossless option just to force Spotify to do the same – eliminating their planned additional income and increasing their overall bandwidth costs at the same time.
But it's strange that the report talks about a "tier" then. That makes it sound like you need to chose it ahead of time instead of per-device.
I’ll be surprised if stick with it. A lot of people I know that started with Spotify have a hard time committing to AM. I used Spotify for like 7 years and I went back and forth forever because I like features that both have. Apple has the money they should just take all the best stuff from both and make a better servicei just ditched Spotify (after ~11 years) for Apple Music. seems like good timing. not quite sure i'll be able to tell the difference as i don't have high quality speakers but if it's a free upgrade then i'll take it. only a few days into my 3 month trial![]()
A huge amount of blind tests have been carried over the years. You can find them doing some research. All tests have proven that 99,9% of people cannot tell the difference between an AAC or MP3 file at 256kbps. Even if using very expensive audio systems. People will tell you they hear a difference, but put them into a blind test and they will fail. In any case, through earphones or headphones, I challenge you to find someone who will be able to tell the difference. To really hear the bass sounds as they were created and are intended to be heard, an earphone or headphone has to 'cheat' on frequencies to give you the illusion that you're hearing bass frequencies. Physically, lower waves need space to develop. Test that yourself by walking away from your speakers. As you move away, you hear the bass sounds better. This is normal. People crank up the volume in their cars to hear the bass sounds better, but people outside the cars hear the bass sounds very well, much better than the driver. With a headphone or earphone, there is no space between the earphone and your ear to develop a bass sound, as there is between a speaker and the listener. This is a huge marketing campaign.is HiFi something only audiophiles will be able to appreciate or is this something that everyone can easily notice?
Any week after the current one, until the heat death of the universe is a 'coming week'.What would you think is an upper bound for "coming weeks"?
Found this one : https://www.npr.org/sections/therec...ll-can-you-hear-audio-quality?t=1619882610013Very skeptical… is there a good test online where we can compare audio and see for ourselves if we can spot the difference between 256 kbps and above ?
And not even getting lossless, but lossy MQA.Beating Tidal too, I'm paying £20 a month for Tidal HiFi. Can't justify that if Apple Music offers the same thing for £10.
All tests have proven that 99,9% of people cannot tell the difference between an AAC or MP3 file at 256kbps.
I have a VERY good amp / speaker home equipment and still a hard time to believe that the normal human ear is able to tell the difference between 256 AAC and lossless - as so many blind tests have proven ...
It could very well be apparent for those of us that drive electric cars with awesome sound systems in them!Yeah, I'm sure combined with road noise, wind, engine, exhaust, horns and general traffic noise, the subtilties of HiFi will come right through in your car and make a big difference! 😂
Probably for people who don’t have unlimited data plans and large data capsInteresting that they're keeping the "HiFi" subscription the same price. Why would anyone then choose lower quality audio when subscribing? Apple should just make HiFi their default across all subscriptions.
I guess Apple has done stuff like this before, like when they added 4K movies at no extra cost to iTunes and upgraded users HD movies to 4K. They shake up industries every once in a while.Admittedly, I completely glossed over the part about cost 😂 Only thing that came to mind was that I'm paying for the Premier tier of Apple One, so the first thought was "what's that going to do to that cost?" I'd be ok with paying a couple extra bucks for it, but if they really do keep the price the same...that's a nice bonus!
Do you have the AirPods Pro or the AirPods Max? There is no such thing as AirPods Pro Max.I subscribe to Apple Music. Is this article saying getting HiFi means $9.99 (base) + $9.99 (HiFi tier)?
I have AirPods Pro Max. HiFi should be most noticeable using the Max.
That's wild. Didn't know HDD had even been around that long.The last time we reported on a rumor from HitsDailyDouble was way back in 2001. They predicted a device called the iPod.
![]()
HitsDailyDouble (who?) Rumor
HitsDailyDouble posted a rumor regarding Apple's upcoming device: iPod, a portable hard drive for music that will feature a firewire connection...www.macrumors.com
Yeah HiFi being the same price is odd. Wouldn't everyone just enable it by default? Then again I suppose some folks using Cellular without an unlimited plan would turn it off.Ok I’m going to say it: If you’re listening to Apple Music on your Airpods, don’t waste your money on the Hi-Fi streaming tier. You need a really solid pair of headphones to take advantage of it.
Edit: Nevermind, didn’t realize it would be no extra cost. That would be outside of the norm