For Russia to have a big enough interest in banning something, it must be used by large enough group of people. iMessage is more limited from the start as it only works between iPhones (which have a market share of less than 30% in Russia). That is just one reason why Telegram ended up massively dominating the messaging market in Russia (created by a Russian likely helped as well).The fact that they don't feel the need to block iMessage tells me they must have a back door that Apple doesn't know about. Telegram must have done such a good job with their encryption model, which is why Russia is freaking out.
Absolutely, but that doesn't mean they could not decide to see who blinks first and do risk their Russia business by putting their foot down. Russia is still more liberal than China, kicking out Apple could result in some notable backlash. And Russia is a much smaller market for Apple than China.Well, if it’s the law and Apple wants to continue doing business in Russia then they’ll just have to comply with the government request and remove the app. Seems pretty cut and dry.
Seems like the question was about the reasoning that was mentioned.Ask Apple. I'm not the one not allowing you to sideload apps. You got a problem? Take it up with Apple... not like they'll listen to you anyway. I'm just the messenger.
Why be on this site if you have so much hatred for Apple. I hate McDonalds food, so I stay off of the McRumors site. (That was not intentional when trying to think of this analogy)
For Russia to have a big enough interest in banning something, it must be used by large enough group of people. iMessage is more limited from the start as it only works between iPhones (which have a market share of less than 30% in Russia). That is just one reason why Telegram ended up massively dominating the messaging market in Russia (created by a Russian likely helped as well).
Note also that Russia hasn't asked Apple to remove Signal (or other encrypted messaging services) as well. They care about being able to do bulk 'filtering' of messages, and thus they mainly care about what service the vast majority uses. They know that if somebody really wants to hide their communication, they'll be able to so regardless.
I believe things of that nature have already been in existence for some time, like FaceTime not being available in some countries, for example.Exactly. Its one thing to ask for a third party app to be removed from app store, its another to ask that built in apps be removed. Apps that are built to work seamlessly throughout the os. Thats not going to happen, and not because they already have a backdoor. Also, and I know its easy for me to say, but if I was Apple, I would say......Ummm, no. We wont be removing legitimate apps that do not violate any App Store policy. If you cant get your telco's and ISP's to block them.....thats your problem. Dont come to us for a work-around. We will be more then happy to take our business elsewhere but we are NOT going to be going country by country, dealing with a mish mash of regulations. This country ok, that country no good. Not going to happen.
This sort of thing is why side-loading should be allowed by Apple.
Wait, I thought they already did allow it, provided it was signed*. I was able to load a very old version of FB Messenger onto my iPhone by dragging the IPA into iTunes. I don't see why it wouldn't work unless Telegram gets their dev certs revoked (even then, you could set your time back, but bleh).That would require Apple to believe in giving consumers choice. It will never happen, Apple doesn't give a damn about you or it's consumers. They only care about their investors. PERIOD.
This sort of thing is why side-loading should be allowed by Apple.
Apple is probably going to be forced to remove the app to keep doing business in Russia, and people in Russia will no longer be able to install the app because their government sucks.
If you're listening, Apple, please enable side-loading. Put it behind as many "This is insecure" dialogs as you want; side-loading would allow people under repressive regimes to keep using the software they need to use.
Yeah. So the only thing Apple won't allow is sideloading closed-source and unsigned bundles, which I don't have sympathy for anyway. 99% just pirated stuff, much of which is likely malware-laden.Ehhh, you can side load. It's called "Xcode". And I believe the telegram iOS code is open source.
This is SO IMPORTANTThis sort of thing is why side-loading should be allowed by Apple.
Apple is probably going to be forced to remove the app to keep doing business in Russia, and people in Russia will no longer be able to install the app because their government sucks.
If you're listening, Apple, please enable side-loading. Put it behind as many "This is insecure" dialogs as you want; side-loading would allow people under repressive regimes to keep using the software they need to use.
Ehhh, you can side load. It's called "Xcode". And I believe the telegram iOS code is open source.
Not sure about the expiration thing cause I've never had that happen, but maybe I've never built without a paid dev account.It's not the same. Apps side loaded this way expire after a week (you have to load them every week) and can't use the push notification service.
It's not the same.
Apps side loaded this way expire after a week (you have to load them every week)
can't use the push notification service.
then if a terrorist attack happened, blame the government for their inability to stop before it happensEncrypt all of the everything that matters and give 'em the finger...
I thought about this comment for some reason. I wonder if this is the reason Apple doesn’t put iMessage on Androind. If they put it on android, maybe it would be an issue for Russia and anyone else that doesn’t like Telegram?So does the iPhone not have not end to end Encryption?