Swell. add that to the huge bug list in Monterey.
It does not hurt to look into what others do and to learn from it for your own platform / favourite gadgets. Both if they do better or worse.So why are you here then? Shouldn’t you be on a Microsoft tech blog?
But other bugs that are much worse.“Always update to the latest version to make sure your devices are as secure as possible” they say... while I sit here with iOS 12 and High Sierra, not being affected by this bug. ??♂️
I don't get the impression that Monterey has a "huge bug list". Catalina seemed to be a low point in quality, perhaps because they changed a lot of internals.
It's a bug, and 50 days and counting is a bit slow for Apple to react, but still well below Google's 90-day responsible disclosure deadline. They shouldn't have disclosed it yet.
The mountains are closer to the spy satellites... there's less clouds to see you thru.Yet eyes in the sky will track you even harder, of course without any permission from you.
They can still track your heat signature via satellite unless you cover your entire body with cold mud like Arnold (Dutch) did to hide from Predator.I feel like I should just burn all my gadgets and go live in the mountains. ?
It is not patched in 15.2.1.Are we sure this bug was not patched in the recent iOS/iPadOS 15.2.1 update?
I live in the mountains. Everyone in Denver did that in 2020 and now no one can afford to live in the mountains...without their gadgets to work remote.I feel like I should just burn all my gadgets and go live in the mountains. ?
Man, I wish I could disagree with this. So Apple's "we are the most secure" marketing is just marketing. Yep, should have known that.Unbelievable the lack of passion & vision behind Safari, the team behind it puts out this unacceptable half baked garbage really, it's truly appalling & disgraceful the lack of leadership, QA and how much the browser has retrogressed, beyond IE levels. So much for Apple's silicon and all the "privacy" smoke but it gets outperformed by almost any mainstream browser in Apple's own OS while also offering less granular privacy tools.
Unreal.
Apple is the major contributor of Webkit. The third party commits are relatively insignificant compared to the commits of Apple employees. Just because Apple has open sourced this technology doesn't take anything away from their responsibility in fixing this.“We’re waiting on the Webkit open source team to fix this.”
For those that don’t know, Webkit is an open source project hosted by Apple. There are many contributors to the project that do not work for Apple. Maybe this isn’t a bug that can just be patched and goes a bit deeper, which would take longer to fix (and the reason why it was not easily discovered).
This isn't limited to iframes, but any tabs that you open during the browsing session. So, any website could be a bad actor and doesn't necessarily have to be an ad network. They could link your Google profile (if logged in) with the tabs that you have open.For every security story, you have to look at “How would this be effective”. For example, there’s currently a critical security flaw in macOS in that if someone has physical access to your computer AND knows your password, they can use the keyboard to type in your password and gain access to your account. If your account is an admin, then they have access to all accounts on your computer! A very serious flaw, to be sure, but I doubt Apple does anything about it.
Here, it mentions something that most users are already aware of and deal with fairly quickly… “a tab or window that runs in the background”. Now, assuming a malicious actor hasn’t already hacked into an ad network, we’re talking about a popup window which most of us see, are annoyed by and close immediately. A closed window can’t continually query anything, and CERTAINLY not in real time.
Additionally, well behaved websites CAN open any website in an iFrame, but would MacRumors do that? Would Apple.com do that? No. There are sites out there that would, but, again, this is a situation where you actively have to put yourself into. If a malicious actor sends you a link via email, and you click on the link, sure, they’d be able to track for as long as you don’t close the browser. BUT, if a malicious actor thinks they can get you to click the link, the payload is going to be FAR more effective than an exploit that “kinda” just tracks you but only if you leave your browser windows open and/or NEVER EVER close popup windows.
Staying calm means Apple will never fix it. Remember they are nothing but a marketing company these days and one penny spent that is not needed (using image as the base requirement) is anti-Cook philosophy.If this was a genuinely serious problem, Apple would have fixed it already. I'm staying calm and carrying on as normal.
Staying calm means Apple will never fix it.
In my experience, it is not "engineering competence" but rather management direction. There are no or not enough engineers assigned to do WebKit security code and testing. Why? Because it adds nothing to the Keynote each year, unless there is a big media hoopla.Apple has a commitment to user privacy but unfortunately doesn't have the engineering competence to consistently back that commitment up.
Yes, and perfectly normal to anyone BUT a security researcher that hasn’t seen their twitter account retweeted in a few months.You mean they can... log in? That seems normal to me.
I wish that, just like I can enable Reader View automatically on a per site basis, I could also disable Javascript on a per site basis.This is just another reason why I disable Javascript unless I need to turn it on.
Where did Apple tell people it “was safe”? Do you have a citation?The irony is that the people who updated because Apple told them they would be safe, ended up less safe and the people who didn't, ended up being more safe.
Still doesn’t change the fact that it’s open source, though. And, that this will be fixed as soon as the WebKit open source community deems it necessary to be fixed.Apple is the major contributor of Webkit. The third party commits are relatively insignificant compared to the commits of Apple employees. Just because Apple has open sourced this technology doesn't take anything away from their responsibility in fixing this.