But why should they? Because you don't like it?
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_3 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8J2 Safari/6533.18.5)
I'm no lawyer, but how does a pretend device prove prior art?
Steve Jobs just needs to play stupid and pretend he's never seen the movie!
I don't think that will work after Jobs was behind the HAL 9000 Y2K commercials.
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_3 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8J2 Safari/6533.18.5)
I'm no lawyer, but how does a pretend device prove prior art?
It proves that Apple did not invent the idea, even the fictional Kubrick design is good enough to establish prior art, and is thus cannot be protected by patent.
Samsung is a sad, sad company.
I fully expect them to come out with a bunch of iMac clones if they buy HP's PC division. I mean they already ripped off the Macbook Airs.
You couldn't be more wrong.as good an effort as this is, its pointless..
Apple owns patents for specific designs and products, and no matter what went before it, that is what Apple are defending...
No matter how good the laywers are, that isnt going to change the outcome.