Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Well the current one is capable of 800Mhz but gets downclocked for battery life and heat. If the new chip doesn't put out more heat, I could see it being a viable option. But I'm assuming it's the same fab process so it probably has the same TDP, but it might be the same TDP at higher frequencies (haven't bothered to read the article yet)

But only if it can throttle. You don't need the 1Ghz or even 800Mhz for the basic apps and background processes. But it would be nice if it could throttle up for games or graphics/mathematically intensive apps. So long as it doesn't over heat.

Very interesting indeed. The Touch HD from HTC could really....REALLY use one of those chips. The one that is in it now is pretty sluggish when it comes to driving Winmo on that gorgeous 480x800 display.
 
Still hoping iPhone 4G ends up with a dual core processor and more ram...

another GPU upgrade would be nice too.. :D

Oooh, could it be called the 3G RS and give it a carbon fibre rear?!

And possibly Fat and Furious style LEDs along the bottom, lol.

Aren't you guys all true believers in Apple? My iPhone 3GI is quad core, carbon fibre and lights up like an acid trip during TRON. It only causes other people's. already obsolete, iPhones to catch fire.

Hold on, I'm getting a call. :D
 
My 2G is faster than the Mac Plus I had.

Is that faster than a Mac+?
Maybe you are being a clown here but my current iPhone is faster than my old Mac Plus. It has color too. The combination of Flash storage and the GPU likely have a lot to do with that. Even after a year and a half I'm still impressed.
Does that overcome the Samsung defendant lawsuit over NAND patents by letting them sell a far higher value added chip instead?
What does NAND Flash have to do with ARM processors?
Toshiba got a $0.5B advance.
Which represents Flash demand for one quarter at Apple. This is only interesting if Apple gas more demand then normal and involves other suppliers.

Sure this Flash is likely to end up in new devices that come out in September but is that a surprise.
Good job guys.

P.S. is 1ghz about the same as 4x 0.25 Ghz and 8x 0.125 Ghz?

Or, wait for it, is it 8x 0.5 ghz with usage management protocol?

Rocketman
Are we trying to be a pain in the ass here?

To put it simply no!


Dave
 
Good point. Perhaps, there will be a point in time in which new Apps will say "requires iPhone3GS or faster," much like computer software often has requirements.

Actually, I think they'll use the OS to specify requirements (for now at least). We already have apps that "require OS 3.0" to run. I'd expect the original iPhone (EDGE) owners won't be going to 4.0 when it comes out and possibly even iPhone 3G owners will be left out.

EDIT: The only hardware change I can think of that would break backwards-compatibility would be a higher resolution screen. Eventually, though, there are going to have to be casualties of progress.
 
I bet that Safari would feel snappier. ;)

LOL! Good one!

Seriously, though, what's the point of buying a 1GHz iPhone that only has 3G? Won't 4G networks be deployed in many countries either by next summer or a few months after?
 
LOL! Good one!

Seriously, though, what's the point of buying a 1GHz iPhone that only has 3G? Won't 4G networks be deployed in many countries either by next summer or a few months after?

The small coverage area of 2010 LTE networks means that an iPhone with LTE is a fair way off. LTE also can't make phone calls yet. For 2010, it isn't being targeted for phone devices in 2010. (it is data-only until operators decide to deploy IMS, which they are all taking a wait-and-see approach)

Look for HSUPA to be added to the iPhone 2010, making YouTube uploads super fast. The may also add another 3G power amplifier - 1700MHz (for T-Mobile USA) or 900MHz (Vodafone AU / Optus AU / Vodafone NZ + perhaps a couple European carriers by then)
 
Computers & Cars

My PDA has been running at 718MHz for about 5 years now. This doesn't seem to be any faster.


Just like your PDA I have a 25 year old Mercury Lynx that gets 45+ mpg. And that is with an engine with a carb & not fuel injection. FI is supposed to burn less gas. But look at what has to be done now to get the same mpg.

The same holds true with some of these cpus. Speed is not the same, lower in most cases. Sometimes the power requirements are less, sometimes not. With smaller die sizes we were promised & would expect faster speeds & less power consumption.

Just as cars come with different combinations so also do computers, handheld, laptop or desktop. May we can catch up with you in the speed department while at the same time lower the power requirements. Unlike cars more cores usually mean less speed, but with the possibility of more work being done in that given time.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.