Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple to Samsung:

1590515228707.png
 
See, Samsung isn’t a totally useless company after all.

It’s foolish to say they are, they produce great products including screens

All you are showing is that Apple is incapable of manufacturing a key part of its phones. Not such a funny situation.

Foolish to do so when Samsung do it the best

Funny how so many Apple lovers put down Samsung etc. but it seems Samsung is a key ingredient to Apple phones.

Like it or not they push each other to get better in all areas
 
Notice how everyone rather use OLED than Micro-LED LCD display when the former is available in high capacity. No amount of shilling can save LCD!
 
Don't quite understand the few people who disagreed with my comment...

"Funny how so many Apple lovers put down Samsung etc. but it seems Samsung is a key ingredient to Apple phones."

They seem to have difficulty with facing reality. Oh well, as long as they are happy in their distorted bubble. :(
 
Don't quite understand the few people who disagreed with my comment...

"Funny how so many Apple lovers put down Samsung etc. but it seems Samsung is a key ingredient to Apple phones."

They seem to have difficulty with facing reality. Oh well, as long as they are happy in their distorted bubble. :(

I’m knee deep in both platforms and it’s a contextually lacking comment. Samsung is a huge conglomerate and the mobile division has nothing to do with the manufacturing division. The Samsung people criticize has nothing to do with the Samsung making these displays. The sad thing is that Apple’s specs and calibration of the panels that Samsung manufactures for them sometimes our-perform Samsung’s in-house panels.

I mean, at least be fair and honest about it. You talk about living in a bubble and it’s quite clear you seem kinda close to that Samsung bubble and can’t get over the same thing you accuse others of. Seems to me Apple is a significant part of Samsung’s revenue(!?). Talk about a scary situation for ol’ Sammy.

Let’s talk about Samsung refrigerators or dishwashers next. Just stop.

Typing this on my 3rd-Gen iPad Pro as a Huawei P30 Pro sits right next to me, just for full-disclosure.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tongxinshe
All you are showing is that Apple is incapable of manufacturing a key part of its phones. Not such a funny situation.
Not at all. Economics 101... Countries that could make a product at home get it manufactured abroad because it is cheaper (the details of the argument may be more complex, but that's the basic idea). Similarly, companies that could make a component themselves have it manufactured by another because it is economically, for the company at least, the best solution. If it made sense to Apple to make their own screens, then they would.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tongxinshe
I dont like Samsung, I wouldn't say I hate them, but I certainly dislike them.

But credit where credit 's due. NAND, GDDR / HBM ( used by your GPU ), DRAM, OLED, Camera Sensor, Battery, 5G, and many others they are quite relentless in tech innovation.

I hope people do give credit and respect to your competitor or enemy, judging from some of the reply here.

I am wondering if BOE will make Diamond Pentitle OLED just for Apple only assuming Apple gets some patent issue sorted out with Samsung.


Some nice revisionism there, samsung literally developed non of that. NAND flash was developed by Toshiba in the 80's, samsung also had next to no role in the initial development of OLED screens and ram


What samsung is good at is abusing their monopolies, price fixing and copying ip, hence why the great Steve Jobs up until the day he died was fighting samsung in court for ripping of the iphone with the carbon copy galaxy line.
Thank samsung and sk hynix south korean duopoly for price fixing nand and ram prices where they own 90%+ of the market, this is why prices of ssds and memory has been over inflated for the last 5+ years.
 

Attachments

  • Apple-vs-Samsung-Apple-before-and-after-iPhone.jpg
    Apple-vs-Samsung-Apple-before-and-after-iPhone.jpg
    107.6 KB · Views: 96
  • Like
Reactions: Justanotherfanboy
Some nice revisionism there, samsung literally developed non of that. NAND flash was developed by Toshiba in the 80's, samsung also had next to no role in the initial development of OLED screens and ram


What samsung is good at is abusing their monopolies, price fixing and copying ip, hence why the great Steve Jobs up until the day he died was fighting samsung in court for ripping of the iphone with the carbon copy galaxy line.
Thank samsung and sk hynix south korean duopoly for price fixing nand and ram prices where they own 90%+ of the market, this is why prices of ssds and memory has been over inflated for the last 5+ years.

Do you understand how Tech innovation actually works? Because if you think "inventing" is the most important thing I suggest you go and do a little research on the meaning of innovation.

Using your analogy, TSMC did no work on Fab and leading edge research, after all they didn't invent manufacturing of transistor.

NAND And DRAM Price Fixing. If they really had price fixing DRAM price /GB wouldn't have fallen to new *historic* low. But I guess most people dont understand much about lead time, capacity planning etc it is a fair mistake so I wont go on.

And Samsung is much bigger than Samsung mobile or Samsung Electronics. The owner of Samsung is also much bigger than the total of Samsung. The case of Samsung copying has nothing to do with its other manufacturing unit.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Expos of 1969
Funny how so many Apple lovers put down Samsung etc. but it seems Samsung is a key ingredient to Apple phones.
People who really know the businesses know Samsung is a great hardware manufacturer. They just don’t know how to implement software and the experience nearly as well as Apple.

Apple also designs the best chips in the industry, so they also understand the importance of hardware...they just don’t want to manufacture it because it’s capital intensive and low margin.
 
  • Like
Reactions: I7guy
Don't quite understand the few people who disagreed with my comment...

"Funny how so many Apple lovers put down Samsung etc. but it seems Samsung is a key ingredient to Apple phones."

They seem to have difficulty with facing reality. Oh well, as long as they are happy in their distorted bubble. :(
Nice try.
Pretty sure when you stoop to lame insults of those you disagree with, you automatically lose the argument, bud.

As to why people disagreed with your comment... hmmm, maybe they rolled their eyes at your COMPLETE lack of understanding of Samsung v. Apple?
Many sensible consumers may agree with Jony Ives’ opinion on the situation- which was (paraphrased): “my guys may work for months on end, sacrificing time with their families, etc. to execute the design vision that we had... it is not flattering at all that then the Samsung design team, quickly iterates an 85% copy over a period of weeks; we find it insulting & unfair”.

That sure resonated with me. It makes sense. I have a disdain for Samsung’s design team, for that reason.

HOWEVER (listen closely now!), those same sensible consumers likely don’t think “ugh, I’ll NEVER own a Samsung TV or refrigerator, since their completely separate mobile division has a sleazy design policy”.

Are you seeing the difference?
That’s why you sound so ridiculous & are getting pushback from people that possess very common knowledge that you are inexplicably unaware of... it is trivial for us to have zero respect for Samsung Mobile’s design team, yet understand that their screen manufacturing division is top notch.
You are lumping them together in a bizarre & disingenuous way to make fun of/take shots at those that have a MUCH better grasp on the situation than you do.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: Expos of 1969
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.