I prefer test that replicate everyday use rather than synthetic benchmarks and cherrypicked tests, where one phone shines over another.
Those are the tests I'd like to see us getting away from.
Side by side testing with videos results means more to me than exaggerated graphs pulled from synthetic benchmarks that mean nothing to 99 percent of smartphone users.
What is relevant to the majority of people isn't necessarily what you're calling relevant, I'm guessing people actually are more app based and probably not as technical as you are thinking they would be.
People want to know Facebook will work properly, Auntie Gillian's photos will be stored nicely, words for friends won't crash, the camera will take great pictures and emails will be received.
But for sure, show us some side by side videos of Lightroom and some heavy web analytics side by side, iphone x vs Galaxy S9+ and why not throw S9+ Exynos vs Snapdragon doing the same because I'm thinking the difference won't be that huge.
Do you have a video to share?
Or are we just taking your word for it?
I'm not that big on anecdotal evidence, whether it's from an individual or a website.
So like I said, not bad for a dud don't you think?
Didn't it do well against the super dooper iPhone?