Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Microsoft makes something you RUN on PCs. The PCs themselves have different brands. There isn't the same logic of "hey, let's go to the place that only sells Apple computers, no Toshiba or HP"

Yes, but Samsung is positioning themselves to control the whole widget - hardware and software - just like Apple. Controlling the retail experience will be part of that, just like Apple. It's disgusting that they are mimicking Apple, but I think they might actually be successful.
 
Samsung.... Will be a few screens about cheap deals on a bunch of outdated crud that runs three versions of Android and can no longer be updated. They will grab the money and not care about the user. The customer service will be a jiffy bag sent out of store and it will be a grimy cramped cheap place only distiguishable from a regular phone section in a store by the 20 neon Samsung signs.


Sorry, have they hired Browett as well? :)
 
I am excited

I just hope the new Samsung stores sell
sgr-a1.gif

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samsung_SGR-A1
and
818.jpg

and
k9tank.jpg
 
And just so happens to have worked for Apple designing their retail space.

Questions: If you were looking to improve your retail standing wouldn't you look to hire the best talent possible for their expertise? Wouldn't you ideally like to have that person understand your industry and products? If your goal is to improve your retail presence and sell more wouldn't you want someone with a proven track record from one of the best retail companies in the world?

The questions are rhetorical. I know the answer.

What would you say if Samsung hired people from the following companies with the goal of improvement: Nike, Burberry, Yves Saint Laurent, Blackberry, and Cumulus Media. Would that be okay? Probably right?

Are Apple employees exempt from being recruited?
 
Last edited:
Why would that be sarcasm? This is probably what disturbs me most. I wonder how much Samscum is paying this guy to lure him away like this. Buying his loyalty. It's disgusting. But then was it so different when Apple hired him. Maybe he was a loyal Blackberry or Microsoft user before. One must wonder...

Because the MR moderators say that's derogatory and have already slapped my hand once.
 
Yes, but Samsung is positioning themselves to control the whole widget - hardware and software - just like Apple. Controlling the retail experience will be part of that, just like Apple. It's disgusting that they are mimicking Apple, but I think they might actually be successful.

Exactly. But I think they need a face, too. It doesn't have to be a Steve Jobs, running the company. But they need someone to be an ambassador for the brand. Samsung makes some pretty cool stuff, but the brand itself isn't cool.
 
This is what makes me think that Samsung's stores will flop.



Are Samsung's products really more popular than Microsoft's? Microsoft continues to dominate the PC market while Samsung is tied with Apple in the mobile market. And despite that, Microsoft's retail efforts flopped. Why? Because people looking to buy Microsoft's products go to existing places like BestBuy to buy them. Similarly, I think that people looking to buy Samsung's products will go to existing places, like BestBuy, RadioShack, and cellular stores, to buy them.

Only time will tell, but my prediction is that Samsung's stores will be a flop much like Microsoft's stores have.

I'm not sure why Microsoft pushed for their own stores to begin with. They have too many products...and boring ones. Not that Office needs to be "exciting", but who goes into a retail store to purchase a copy of Office?? Apple's model works for them. They can show off their machines, and there's only a few of them.
 
Questions: If you were looking to improve your retail standing wouldn't you look to hire the best talent possible for their expertise? Wouldn't you ideally like to have that person understand your industry and products? If your goal is to improve your retail presence and sell more wouldn't you want someone with a proven track record from one of the best retail companies in the world?

The questions are rhetorical. I know the answer.

What would you say if Samsung hired people from the following companies with the goal of improvement: Nike, Yves Saint Laurent, Blackberry, and Cumulus Media. Would that be okay? Probably right?

Are Apple employees exempt from being recruited?

I just find it humorous since Samsung is continually accused of copying Apple. If they wanted to shed the moniker of copier of all things Apple, then they probably shouldn't hire this guy. The point is, Samsung doesn't care. Is this the one guy in the whole world best suited for the job? I don't know. Maybe. Samsung couldn't find one other talented, highly capable individual with the designs skills and vision that Samsung is looking for that didn't come from Apple? Maybe not.

It's just ironic, I guess. And funny.
 
It'll be interesting to see how this plays out. Apple used the retail stores to enhance its own brand and it became a virtuous cycle, brand and store popularity fueling each other. However, Apple was never considered a cheap brand and their stores reflected that. For me, Samsung is synonymous with cheap. And selling a cheap brand in a fancy store doesn't work.

edit: I'd assume that they'd hire an Apple guy to go for a similar look-and-feel. However, it is possible that the guy will be asked to use his general retail experience to develop a concept that's more closely aligned with Samsung's 'brand'.
 
Hmm. My guess is that he didn't get along with the new head of Apple Retail, the former CEO from Burberry... and decided to find another opportunity.

As for all the comments in this thread about irony, being sued, etc... welcome to the real lives of professionals. People tend to stay within their line of expertise.

Right now, if you want to work for the top mobile device sellers in the world, there's Apple and Samsung.

Heck, just last year Apple hired away Samsung's senior CPU designer, to build custom Apple chips.
 
Yet another reason to NOT buy anything Samsung

Asians love to copy,they don't innovate.They did it with camera's cars, tv's.Luckly Apple has deep pockets.Other companies are not so fortunate.
I try to avoid anything made by Samsung.
 
Hmm. My guess is that he didn't get along with the new head of Apple Retail, the former CEO from Burberry... and decided to find another opportunity.

Really? That's your guess? And not that they threw a big pile of money at him to join Samsung?

Who knows...

As for all the silly comments in this thread about irony, being sued, etc... welcome to the real lives of professionals. People tend to stay within their line of expertise.

What's so silly about them? In the real lives of professionals there are non-compete agreements and buy-outs etc. I have no idea what his particular contract called for but neither do you. It's just as easily to speculate one way as it is the other.
 
Copy it all Samsung....

Oh how I despise Samsung and everything they stand for. Every industry they enter they do so by copying the leader / innovator ... not just phones and tablets, TV's, Washers, Dryers, Fridges etc etc ...

Samsung just got through totally ripping off the Dyson Vacuum, patents or not they don't care. Dyson is suing but unfortunately doesn't have the same deep pockets Apple has for the Lawyers ... hope he wins regardless.
Amen. I will never buy anything with the name Samsung on it. Can't help it if it is built in memory in my new iPhone or something like that.
Samsung are rats. People say 'Apple don't innovate anymore' or 'Apple is too closed'. And then they buy some Google controlled Samsung piece of plastic ****. Why?
 
Well duh, they care about your wallet. But they couldnt give any less of a crap about your personal feelings or 'fanboyism'.

This whole pro-apple, pro-samsung, anti this and that whining has gotten to such a level that its rendered much of the general public completely stupid.

Well you did say they don't care about you AT ALL.... :D
 
You're free to believe whatever you like, but please know that its a business and profits mean far more than anything else. Want another shining example? Just go look at pharmaceuticals. Have any of them cured ANYTHING?

And my Mac Pro reference you don't understand because you're not a prosumer. Simply wanting it versus actually needing are very different. You'd understand the context better if you were, say, a developer or sound engineer.

Well, I don't seem to see anyone dying of the flu or smallpox anymore so I would say that, yes, pharmaceuticals seem to be doing something.

I understood your reference because I know what computer components do. I just don't care about your disappointment.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.