Are you seriously arguing that there is a difference between disapproving the order and a veto?
And the difference between the president issuing an order and someone acting with his authority?
Not only are you wrong, but even if you were right, you are arguing a semantic distinction without a difference.
That's EXACTLY what I'm saying. And, no, I'm not wrong. I don't care about the EFFECT of the disapproval. The point is, MacRumors used incorrect and misleading words. Why is it okay for MacRumors to distort reality but wrong for me to "argue a semantic distinction"?