Samsung Loses $1 Billion in Market Value After U.S. Veto on Apple Ban, Files Appeal Against Patent Ruling

Discussion in ' News Discussion' started by MacRumors, Aug 5, 2013.

  1. MacRumors macrumors bot


    Apr 12, 2001

    After the Obama administration vetoed a partial ban on the import and sale of some Apple products, Samsung announced that it has been granted a hearing in a US appeals court next year against the original ruling, as reported by the Financial Times. Concurrently, The Wall Street Journal reports that Samsung has lost $1 billion in market value after the weekend veto. The South Korean government has also criticized the decision, saying it had "concern over the possible negative impacts that this kind of decision could have on Samsung Electronics' patent rights".

    Originally, the ban of Apple products was granted back in June in response to a ruling made by the USITC (United States International Trade Commission) and applied to AT&T models of the iPhone 4 and iPhone 3GS, as well as the 3G models of the iPad and iPad 2. The USITC ruled that all four products infringed on a Samsung patent, specifically Patent No. 7,706,348, titled "Apparatus and method for encoding/decoding transport format combination indicator in CDMA mobile communication system."

    Apple and Samsung have been in a long, ongoing legal battle that started in 2011, with the first U.S. trial awarding $1 billion to Apple in 2012. However, a judge voided nearly half of that amount in March, and a new trial between the two companies is set for November of this year.

    Article Link: Samsung Loses $1 Billion in Market Value After U.S. Veto on Apple Ban, Files Appeal Against Patent Ruling
  2. Jack97 macrumors regular


    Nov 30, 2010
    This whole affair needs to stop now. It's so childish.
  3. pirg macrumors 6502a


    Apr 18, 2013
  4. jonnysods macrumors 601


    Sep 20, 2006
    There & Back Again
  5. ValSalva macrumors 68040


    Jun 26, 2009
    Burpelson AFB
    What's a billion dollars here and there between frenemies? :D
  6. Four oF NINE macrumors 68000

    Four oF NINE

    Sep 28, 2011
    Hell's Kitchen
    I don't even understand how this is a big deal.. Those iPads are obsolete, so is the iPhone 3G, 3GS, and the 4 will be as well in a few weeks.
  7. thepowerofnone macrumors member

    Apr 10, 2011
    Not surprised. The veto was a really, really stupid thing to do. These devices aren't on sale anymore, with the exception of the iPhone 4 which is soon to be redundant too. It looks like Apple is being uniquely protected by the American government - its the sort of thing you might expect of a news report out of China, not the States.

    Laws are laws; whether the patent battles are silly or not, a judge rules that a sales ban was necessary and the US government just went over their heads.
  8. Serelus macrumors 6502a


    Aug 11, 2009
    What did samsung expect? From Apple news lately we all know several governments in the US started using Apple products in bulk. So a ban would kind of not work out well in that regard?
  9. Georgij macrumors regular

    Mar 11, 2013
    I think it is more a reaction to that Samsung's future SEP litigations will also fail.
  10. Ursadorable macrumors 6502


    Jul 9, 2013
    The Frozen North
    They may have bamboozled the courts, but Samsung's obvious copying of the iPhone/iPad have finally come to bite them in the ass.

    Karma's a bitch.
  11. Xavier macrumors 68020

    Mar 23, 2006
    I think you mean FRANDemies.
  12. pirg macrumors 6502a


    Apr 18, 2013
    The power to veto is also part of the laws of the land. Checks and balances or something
  13. quagmire macrumors 603


    Apr 19, 2004
    You don't think South Korea protects their industries too? South Korea, China, Japan, etc are all very protective of their industries.

    And the US has protected their industries too. Steel companies, airline industry, the automotive industry(chicken tax and the bailouts), etc.

    This wasn't simply the government giving Apple special treatment.
  14. gnasher729 macrumors P6


    Nov 25, 2005
    You seem to think that the US government acted somehow outside the law. But what they did was actually exactly what they are supposed to do: When the USITC makes a decision, it is actually up to the government to either accept or reject the decision.

    You should also note the fact that in the EU, Samsung was threatened with major (multi billion dollar) fines if they should attempt to ban iOS devices over standard essential patents, which is exactly what they managed to do in the USA. If Samsung had gone to a German or French equivalent of the ITC and not the US one, _Samsung_ would have received a major fine.

    But someone else found what is likely the reason for the government rejection of the ITC decision which you can check out at here:

    Dissenting opinion by one of the ITC judges involved. According to this, the ITC decision was very, very wrong in the first place.
  15. infantjoe macrumors newbie

    Oct 31, 2012
    Samsung can hit back

    Since Samsung has become the supplier of Apple again, can they find another way of dealing with apple?
  16. ElTorro macrumors 6502

    Jan 23, 2013
    It's the opposite. Apple's suing Samsung came back and bit them in the ass with this ITC ruling, but due to unknown behind the scenes dealings the President showed that Apple is above the law. This will not go down well with a lot of people and at the end, it will hurt Apple more than you'd think.
  17. apolloa macrumors G3


    Oct 21, 2008
    Time, because it rules EVERYTHING!
    So how long until this thread turns into a political battle and gets closed too then? You know seeing as it invites people to breach the Mac Rumors rules by discussing politics in news articles?
  18. Rogifan macrumors P6


    Nov 14, 2011
    Oh good grief. Samsung stock was down ~1% today. Big deal. Apple had lost billions in market value in a single day for no reason many times. This really is a non story.
  19. jm001 macrumors 6502a


    Sep 19, 2011
    FTW! Nice one#
  20. Zodiac.mj macrumors member

    Mar 10, 2013
    Well lets face it, you have to protect YOUR companies. Who else would supply NSA/CIA and other agencies with all those personal information :)
  21. balamw Moderator


    Staff Member

    Aug 16, 2005
    New England
    MOD NOTE: This thread is not in PRSI. If you wish do make politically charged posts about this, please start a new thread there.

    Overtly political posts will be removed as Off Topic in this thread.

  22. apolloa macrumors G3


    Oct 21, 2008
    Time, because it rules EVERYTHING!
    Sigh, the president hasn't done anything, it was his ADMINISTRATION who dealt with it all, and over on 9to5mac they are already discussing how Apple is actually falling out with the White House with incidents like its fixed eBook pricing scandal, Apple is continuing to refuse to back down and settle and that is already biting them in the arse.
  23. MvdM macrumors regular

    Apr 27, 2005
    I wouldn't be surprised if they put malicious code in iPad processors.
  24. apolloa macrumors G3


    Oct 21, 2008
    Time, because it rules EVERYTHING!
    And how are we supposed to know what you mods consider, overtly political then? Its an article involving the US government and Apple but speaking about politics in a news article is a breach of your rules? Maybe a suggestion is to move this article into the correct place on the website?
  25. osofast240sx macrumors 68030


    Mar 25, 2011
    Then the judges should follow the law. But to stay on topic 1 billion is a drop in the bucket for Samsung.

Share This Page