Burn in on phone screens is now non existent ! It has been for a while now. Try harder....
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Samsung Offers to Supply Foldable Displays to Apple and Google
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Maybe try and read versus conjuring up nonsense.
If you look at an OLED display off-angle, you might notice slight shifts in color and hue. This is a characteristic of OLED and is normal behavior. With extended long-term use, OLED displays can also show slight visual changes. This is also expected behavior and can include “image persistence” or “burn-in,” where the display shows a faint remnant of an image even after a new image appears on the screen. This can occur in more extreme cases such as when the same high contrast image is continuously displayed for prolonged periods of time. We’ve engineered the Super Retina display to be the best in the industry in reducing the effects of OLED "burn-in."
from an article published by Apple in Sep 2018
https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT208191
Published by Apple as part of a marketing campaign!!!!
Brilliant!!! You sir, are adorable!!!!!! Tim cook has been on the phone, would you like to buy a bridge?
Because not everyone uses, needs, nor sees the AppleTV as a bigger screen to be a viable/useful solution. Mirroring a screen is garbage on AppleTV vs having a larger screen when/where you actually require it.
When more powerful apps are delivered to utilize the requirement and power of a larger screen with REAL compelling use cases to answer the real question/problem/ask ... THEN Apple will compete.
Apple is FAR too conservative to consider a foldable phone outside of their internal think-tanks. No real full working prototype is build until Apple really considers it and has a working business/retail sales case already aligned.
Alas ... Apple also doesn't like to often show off their most innovative products for sale. Seems to always shoot themselves in the foot:
1. PowerMac G4 Cube (I still love the design and engineering innovative hardware design of this PC)
2. Mac Pro 2013-2018 "Trash Can" (lol ... that knickname says it all. Do I personally want one, yes. but I'm not ever going to pay 2013 retail pricing for it. It's still useful for non real professionals that make their income after taxes on this).
3. Apple Duo (great concept that never evolved and too forward thinking for what the hardware at launch time could deliver on, sadly).
Honestly I can only see the PowerBook G4 Titanium as the real success of Apple showing an innovative product that sold very well: fibre LED backlit keyboard, Ultrawide display with super thin bezels that took Apple close to 12yrs to get to again with the 2016-2018 MBP's.
For once you can say I’d rather buy an iPad Pro and an iPhone XS and save money
Would you need gravy, tomato/pesto sauce, or dressing with your shoes?
Are you talking sweaty grime used shoes or something else?
Mark this post guys ... something tells me Heineken is going to regret it; and I want video proof of you eating your shoes if Apple makes a foldable phone. Just remember you did NOT state anything about Apple selling a foldable phone, just making one!
[doublepost=1551832388][/doublepost]
VR Gaming already took off: Nantec's Nintendo Pokemon Go = that's AR gaming in real use.
[doublepost=1551833863][/doublepost]I've not seen this level of quality in presentation since the SonyEricsson X1 with HTC's arc slider for physical KB.
https://news.samsung.com/global/video-get-to-know-the-galaxy-fold
You clearly fall for marketing spin, in a big way
The tract you quoted uses terms like "slight"
A slight change can be from 100% ideal to 99.99%. If labs can prove a change like this then a claim so made is not a lie.
Also burn in claim -
"This can occur in more extreme cases such as when the same high contrast image is continuously displayed for prolonged periods of time".
This will not occur on a modern smart phone.
However, the claim is not a lie.
Edit: Notice use of words "can" "continuously" "prolonged"
Last edited:
That’s literally the definition. Some prefer “alternative facts” over reality.
A shop display model, maybe? A personal handset.. not any more.. if this is fake news.. then wow.....You clearly fall for marketing spin, in a big way
The tract you quoted uses terms like "slight"
A slight change can be from 100% ideal to 99.99%. If labs can prove a change like this then a claim so made is not a lie.
Also burn in claim -
"This can occur in more extreme cases such as when the same high contrast image is continuously displayed for prolonged periods of time".
This will not occur on a modern smart phone.
However, the claim is not a lie.
Edit: Notice use of words "can" "continuously" "prolonged"
It's a shame that trolls like yourself ruin these threads for everyone else having a serious discussion.