If Apple did this, you'd see these comments:
'I've seen bendable things before. This isn't innovation.'
But since Samsung is doing this, it's 'innovation'.
You are correct because Samsung did it first.
If Apple did this, you'd see these comments:
'I've seen bendable things before. This isn't innovation.'
But since Samsung is doing this, it's 'innovation'.
I bet Apple will beat Samsung in the watch strap market though
Surely a better solution to what you describe is to make calls, check notifications, send texts using your Smart Watch?Feel free to stick with literally as long as you like.Couple of things. 1. You do realize the video is nearly 4 years old right? I'm going to go out on a limb and say the design of the rumored hybrid device would reflect Samsung's current design language. We'll disagree on big chunk of hardware since the guy literally<-- tee hee -- put it in a shirt pocket. 2. Why would you feel compelled to always unfold it? Making a call, checking notifications, sending a text - use the small screen. Watching a movie/video, working on a document, playing games - larger screen. Pretty simple. At least to me it is. 3. The scenarios you built to support your narrative are, honestly, pretty shaky. Cumbersome Based on what exactly? Couldn't have been anything in the video. Always want to open to big screen. Why exactly? To check a notification, answer/make a call, or read/reply to a text.
The device would clearly be a marketed as a hybrid device that eliminates the need for a phone and a tablet. BTW - dual screen with eInk? Already been done.
![]()
NOPE ... Apple's whole ecosystem has been about thinner ... laptops, macs, phones, pads, and soon to be watches ... that's all we've seen for like that last 5, 6, 7 years ... and not much else.
That is the WORST video I have ever seen, I almost ripped my eyes out.
A comment like yours is the reason I like MR. Well thought out and makes sense for a certain type of user. Kudos. I'm not that type of user, but well thought out nonetheless. I come from an opposite direction. A device like this rumored Samsung hybrid seems to be a better solution. In my use case, a smartwatch would only be useful for glancing at notifications. The screen's too small for texting and I'm not a fan of Siri. Any halfway in depth activity would require the phone. I'd abhore making a call on a watch because of speakerphone. That would necessitate a BT headset. So by my estimation, I could have 1 device that functions as a phone and a tablet or I could have 3 (watch, phone, and tablet) that perform the same function. 3 devices doesn't seem like a better solution to me.Surely a better solution to what you describe is to make calls, check notifications, send texts using your Smart Watch?
THIS is why many people have no patience with the idea --- it's predicated on a very particular model of the world, and that's a model that's already falling apart (or, if you prefer, growing richer).
You think the future is the world of today, with today's devices doing "more stuff". But Apple doesn't make compromise devices: they don't make Surface's, and they won't make phone/tablet/eReader hybrids. Apple's solution to "lightweight computing" is the Apple Watch, it is not a "lightweight mode for your iPhone".
And no one cares.You are correct because Samsung did it first.
I'd give my right arm and bet that Samsung somehow found out that Apple ordered different OLED screens through one of their dummy companies for test purposes and now trying to be the first (even with rumors) with this tech, which is in no way ready for market at this point with available technology. Right now it would have to be pretty thick. And what a coincidence this rumor comes a few days before WWDC. Someone tries to steal a bit of attention huh?!
Congrats, you are the king of sarcasm. That said, really, how can a folding screen be of much use when everything else absolutely cannot flex? The two likely configurations are a clamshell/flip-phone with the electronics on the backside of each shell OR all the electronics at one end with the screen flopping freely like a Jordan tongue. The clamshell style might seem more likely but it won't be able to close too tightly because even flexible screens cannot be folded (i.e. bulky). The floppy screen configuration would be absolutely awkward to operate. The technology to make a flexible phone practical just isn't there yet.Oh my gosh - you're right. I am sure they haven't even thought about that. I am sure that they've been working on the screen with no consideration to batteries and components for the rest of the phone. You should totally call them!![]()
That's what you call....."Thinking Different".
bbeagle said:↑
If Apple did this, you'd see these comments:
'I've seen bendable things before. This isn't innovation.'
But since Samsung is doing this, it's 'innovation'.
You are correct because Samsung did it first.
It may arrive someday but for now, it's a joke that gets rolled out every couple years for god-only-knows what reason.
Finally something for Apple to reinvent.
Smartphone maker and display manufacturer Samsung is believed to launch a pair of smartphones in early 2017, each with a bendable OLED display. According to people familiar with the smartphones' development (via Bloomberg), the two devices could be unveiled as early as Q1 2017 -- potentially at Mobile World Congress in February -- and come in two different sizes, similar to that of the iPhone 6s and iPhone 6s Plus.
![]()
Bendable smartphone mockup by Samsung
One phone would have a 5-inch screen when used in a normal handset fashion, and could then be opened to a tablet size that's "as large as 8 inches." The smaller alternative is estimated to be sized around a traditional modern 5-inch smartphone, but users would have the ability to fold it in half "like a cosmetic compact" to easily fit it into bags and pockets.
Codenamed "Project Valley," the bendable smartphones won't be Samsung's new flagship devices, and are believed to be angled more as an experiment by the company to test the waters of user response to bendable screens. Because of this, the two new handhelds also won't fall under the Galaxy S line of phones currently running by Samsung, but will be newly named entries in its collection of smartphones.
While not bendable, Apple's 2017 iPhone is expected to pack in a curved OLED display with an edge-to-edge, bezel-free design, similar to that of Samsung's Galaxy S7 smartphone. Overall, Apple's "iPhone 8" is expected to be a huge update year for the company's smartphone, following 2016's internals-focused upgrade, so it'll be interesting to see how the the two handhelds fare against each other when they launch.
Article Link: Samsung Rumored to Launch Fully Bendable Smartphones in 2017
Why does Apple have to suddenly make display panels? The division of Samsung that makes this != Samsung mobile. Apple is not in the display panel business either. You know Apple can just buy these if it works, from Samsung, right? In fact, Apple is already buying components from Samsung.This is truly insane. I'd switch if this works smoothly.
A lot of Apple knocks on here, but I'd imagine they would HAVE to release something within the year once Samsung is out with it.
Why does Apple have to suddenly make display panels? The division of Samsung that makes this != Samsung mobile. Apple is not in the display panel business either. You know Apple can just buy these if it works, from Samsung, right? In fact, Apple is already buying components from Samsung.
So, it's apparently been long enough since the last time that technology was "unveiled." I guess, we're all supposed to get excited about it again?
Bendable displays has become the Duke Nukem Forever of hardware tech. It may arrive someday but for now, it's a joke that gets rolled out every couple years for god-only-knows what reason.
Really? You do realize that bendable displays have made headlines about a dozen times over the last decade, right? It's the worst example of vaporware ever at this point. This is far from "thinking different."
The reason people get excited when Apple unveils this kind of thing and the reason Apple gets so much credit for these "innovations" is because when they show these kinds of things off, it's a live demo followed by a release date.
Surely a better solution to what you describe is to make calls, check notifications, send texts using your Smart Watch?
THIS is why many people have no patience with the idea --- it's predicated on a very particular model of the world, and that's a model that's already falling apart (or, if you prefer, growing richer).
You think the future is the world of today, with today's devices doing "more stuff". But Apple doesn't make compromise devices: they don't make Surface's, and they won't make phone/tablet/eReader hybrids. Apple's solution to "lightweight computing" is the Apple Watch, it is not a "lightweight mode for your iPhone".
What would be amazing if Samsung stops stooping to the lowest level and bash competitor products (who ever they are doesn't matter) and focusses more on their innovation.