That is precisely why I said that you are missing the point.Tell you what then, let’s wait until the guy who posted makes it clear.
My money is still on him saying that Apple are also theives. I am recreating nothing - this makes your post even more short sighted than that of the Mad Hatter. The point, I’ll repeat as the text has obviously come out on a black background at your end, is that you cannot say that Samsung are bad for stealing but Apple are not. Comprendez?
I’ll put it out there so that we are clear;
Apple steal also, they have stolen before and will continue to steal, just like most of them.
There is a topic here, which is Samsung's theft and whether they should pay - it simply follows form the article. Whether Apple steal or not is irrelevant to that topic, as Analog kid already very nicely pointed out.
Also, I'd suggest that you don't go into the usual fallacy of "this one is a criminal and that one is a criminal, so they are just the same". Simply put, some are worse than others and if you look at who Samsung are, what they do and where they come from, there is simply no comparison with Apple.
By all means, feel free to quote that vast majority, because it seems that you are just creating some opposing party out of thin air. There is no denying that Apple stole. And that changes nothing to the current topic; that is what people are saying.The point is that Apple steal too and that the vast majority of people here seem to deny that.
And? Ok, agreed, now what? Where does that argument lead?The ones arguing against Apple here are not saying that Samsung haven’t copied. They are pointing out the fact that Apple are thieves too.
What are you even on about? What dispensation? Or, are you just talking nonsense in general?they do not get some special dispensation because you are in love with their products and their late founder
You simply do not have a point pertaining to the topic.