Yes, which I stated in the part of my quote you omitted: "Until the judge decides otherwise."
There is no "otherwise", because the judge never decided if any IP was infringed in the first place. ("Stolen American IP", was what you said.)
All she decided so far was the obvious truth that if Apple's explanation of their patent claims held up they would probably win. She also said that if Samsung's counter explanation held up, then they would probably win.
If the legal claims were as silly as the Android fans here claim, would a preliminary injunction have been granted at all? Unlikely.
I don't think most people in this thread (including you or you would've brought them up) even know what the legal claims are in this case. So let's review:
There were just two (*) Apple patents at question for the interlocutory injunction.
One was about the construction of a capacitive touchscreen. The patent talks about painting circuits on both sides of a sheet of material. Samsung says they didn't do that. They used two sheets. Apple countered that they didn't necessarily mean both sides of the SAME sheet. The judge didn't think much of this, since the patent claims didn't mention that situation, but was willing to defer for the time being.
The other patent is the infamous one about deciding whether to lock scrolling to only vertical, or to allow 2D movements, depending on the starting flick angle. The judge questioned the same claim writing that I did when it came out, which was how is that angle determined?
So her problem was that no one could agree on what Apple's patent claims meant, because their claim writing was so ambiguous. They even brought in a professor and an engineer to try to help. She wrote that both explanations could make sense and therefore the only choice was to continue to trial as-is.
This was not about some blatant copying of patents or design. It's about vague implementation claims. Neither side here has good footing.
(*) Apple withdrew using their slide-to-unlock patent after the Dutch judge on the opposite side of the world said it would probably get thrown out if challenged.