Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
It's hilarious watching so many companies attempt to differentiate and still all look the precise same. Of all of the imaginable configurations, it must be a pure white, glossy case with a pinpoint-sized bright green LED?
Enough with the "copying" garbage. Samsung was the first of the two companies with true wireless earbuds. Their Gear IconX headphones preceded the AirPods to market by 6 months. (They rebranded their wearables division, dropping the "Gear", in 2018.) And in the going on 5 years since Apple released the AirPods, there has been absolutely no attempt by Samsung to emulate their form or function. Instead, Samsung has continued to iterate on their pre-existing product. The same with their smartwatches: preceded the Apple Watch by 2 years, introduced LTE to smartwatches back when everyone mocked it as a ridiculous concept, and continue to mostly do their own thing with it regardless of what Apple's product does.

I know that a lot of people are still salty over the "rounded corners/home button/pinch to zoom" thing but seriously that was 2009. Since Samsung went in their own direction with the Galaxy Note - and "phablets" in general - and became the largest selling smartphone company in the world as a result, the most significant idea that Samsung has gotten from Apple was dropping the headphone jack. By contrast, since then Apple has adopted A) the phablet form factor, B) the multi-tasking UI features, C) stylus support, D) curved OLED screens, E) dropped the home button, F) will within the next 2 years adopt in screen fingerprint scanners and foldable phones ... modern iPhones have far more in common with the look and UX/UI of Samsung Galaxy phones - and this will be the case even more so when iOS 14 is released - than they do all iPhones released before the iPhone 6. But Samsung won't sue because they are making far more money selling Apple the components that Apple uses to make iPhones more closely resemble Samsung phones!
 
Enough with the "copying" garbage. Samsung was the first of the two companies with true wireless earbuds. Their Gear IconX headphones preceded the AirPods to market by 6 months. (They rebranded their wearables division, dropping the "Gear", in 2018.) And in the going on 5 years since Apple released the AirPods, there has been absolutely no attempt by Samsung to emulate their form or function. Instead, Samsung has continued to iterate on their pre-existing product. The same with their smartwatches: preceded the Apple Watch by 2 years, introduced LTE to smartwatches back when everyone mocked it as a ridiculous concept, and continue to mostly do their own thing with it regardless of what Apple's product does.

I know that a lot of people are still salty over the "rounded corners/home button/pinch to zoom" thing but seriously that was 2009. Since Samsung went in their own direction with the Galaxy Note - and "phablets" in general - and became the largest selling smartphone company in the world as a result, the most significant idea that Samsung has gotten from Apple was dropping the headphone jack. By contrast, since then Apple has adopted A) the phablet form factor, B) the multi-tasking UI features, C) stylus support, D) curved OLED screens, E) dropped the home button, F) will within the next 2 years adopt in screen fingerprint scanners and foldable phones ... modern iPhones have far more in common with the look and UX/UI of Samsung Galaxy phones - and this will be the case even more so when iOS 14 is released - than they do all iPhones released before the iPhone 6. But Samsung won't sue because they are making far more money selling Apple the components that Apple uses to make iPhones more closely resemble Samsung phones!
Instead of burning down the straw man, you created another one. The crows are laughing even harder now.
 
As both an Apple and Android user I have to first say "thanks" for doing this review, and it seems to not have a bias.

I am not the target market for earbuds and I have always felt that "tilting my head to the side" should not cost me 80 bucks. It's a shame that prices for these things are so high when their sound quality suffers so much compared to an average set of over-ear headphones.
 
It would be necessary to ignore the obvious differences in each product to come up with looks precisely the same. Heck, even a blind person would be like, bruh... c'mon man. Considering white is but one of the available colors, it's even more hilarious to claim sameness. What you're doing is the equivalent of claiming a Ford Focus and a Honda Civic look precisely the same because they're painted white and have headlights. :D
View attachment 943987
Yup, Samsung is not copying Apple. Samsung is copying Sony in this instance. :D
images
 
These don't look bad, much better than the airpods that IMO look terrible hanging out of your ears. It's a shame about ANC though, that's an important feature for me. I think the Sony's beat both of these out, but they are rather large.
 
2)The AirPods Pro do not support the tap features like AirPods do, unless this was changed in a firmware update, so I wouldn’t say the gestures are similar unless you’re comparing Galaxy Buds Live to AirPods.

They do. You squeeze the stem instead of tapping. It's pressure based. Single squeeze: play/pause. Long squeeze: ANC on/off. Double-squeeze: next track. Triple squeeze: previous track.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DeepIn2U
They do. You squeeze the stem instead of tapping. It's pressure based. Single squeeze: play/pause. Long squeeze: ANC on/off. Double-squeeze: next track. Triple squeeze: previous track.
@7thson is correct. The Pros do not support the tap features like the regular Airpods and the Beans. As you accurately noted, the Pros use a pressure based squeeze system, not tap. The article incorrectly states the gestures of the Pros and the Beans are similar. They're not.
 
I think Samsung could be missing a great marketing opportunity here. Called them “The Bean” and run an ad campaign with Mr Bean (Rowan Atkinson) as the spokesperson. I know he could put together a hilarious and unforgettable ad. He is a comedic genius!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5105973
Enough with the "copying" garbage. Samsung was the first of the two companies with true wireless earbuds....
Actually, Samsung wouldn't be anywhere without bluetooth, a technology they "copied" errr licensed. Most of what's in the mobile phone sector is about changing the shape, as in fashion. A lot of technology in and around phones has been invented somewhere else first.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DeepIn2U
They do. You squeeze the stem instead of tapping. It's pressure based. Single squeeze: play/pause. Long squeeze: ANC on/off. Double-squeeze: next track. Triple squeeze: previous track.
Tapping is not the same as squeezing. I don’t even have to actually touch my AirPods to pause/play/rewind. They’re sensitive enough to register taps on the earlobe. I’m disappointed Apple didn’t include the functionality in the AirPods Pro but there probably was a good reason for this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sebosz
I think the Samsung headphones look good when in your ear. Got me to thinking about what the future of headsets could be, where they fit in our ears filling up the outer ear area, and have enough battery life to simply leave in place all day. Using pass-through for hearing the outside world, noise canceling when needed and even amplification of sounds for those with hearing issues.

One thing I’ve noticed with the AirPods Pro, that I’ve been wearing more each day lately, is that when I take them out at the end of the day, I’ve got a ghost feeling that they’re still there, or that they just slipped out, for the better part of 30 minutes once out. I end up touching my ear to see if they’re still in. It‘s a bit weird.

The benefit of non-intrusive headsets, like the AirPods or these bean forms, is that they’re less taxing on the ear / ear canal. If the AirPod Pros didn’t have the pressure equalization, I would never be able to wear them, as I can’t stand the plugged ear sensation in-ear buds generally create - that’s after growing up with severe ear issues (infections, impactions, tubes).
 
How about a review on the product by itself where you aren’t comparing an Apple product to the Samsung product. I hate “reviews” like this.
 
Is that supposed to be funny? I'm not sure what you're implying.
I guess he’s implying that they are inferior in some way. Meanwhile, if you check the sites that do not push an agenda, the reviews are stellar. Not saying this reviews was bad, but comparing them to the Apple product is a crappy way to review a new product.
 
I guess he’s implying that they are inferior in some way. Meanwhile, if you check the sites that do not push an agenda, the reviews are stellar. Not saying this reviews was bad, but comparing them to the Apple product is a crappy way to review a new product.
Yeah that ain’t it chief. See my post above.
 
Chicago is home to Cloud Gate, it’s that gigantic mirror finish bean art piece. I would have gone with “these should sell very well in Boston.”
Sorry about that(!), I forgot about that sculpture, and I've never been to Chicago. I honestly just wondered what connection you were making. :) Anyhow...I think this was a fair review. The review on The Verge was was good as well — though they really don't make it so clear that the ANC is as limited as it sounds here and in other reviews I have read.

In any case, Samsung anything would not be on my purchase list, since I own and iPhone, iPad, and Macs. Any Samsung-specific benefits won't apply, whereas Apple AirPods Pro are appealing. I just wish they were 5.1 Bluetooth — I think the battery life would be better by at least an hour. And my feeling is that we'll see a new AirPods Pro with 5.1 Bluetooth in a few months.

The other concern I have with ALL true wireless earbuds is the expected lifespan for the batteries in these tiny pieces. My other true wireless earbuds (Bang & Olufsen) start to degrade at about 1 year. It is a waste with all of these that they are garbage once the batteries die for good. Though, I still have bought two editions of the B&O e8's (1st and 2nd Gen). Even the 1st Gen, which are 2-1/2 years old at this point, have decent battery life, though noticeably reduced from when they were new. And while many ranters online rate these poorly, they are fabulous, and I have never had any connection issues with either version. But I waited several months when I bought the first pair, after they'd upgraded the software and worked out the bugs.

What bothers me about the AirPods Pro is that there is no equalizer app -- I think that a $250 device should offer that.

I'm not interested in the original AirPods - poor sound and no ear seal.
 
What's really missing to me is the total lack of innovation they could have done with truly wireless buds. Apple, Samsung, Wally World, etc.

Imagine them doubling as a hearing aid for seniors? Why hasn't this even been considered? They keep making them smaller and yet refuse to take advantage of this?
 
I recall a few years ago Tim Cook commenting that components like microphones and batteries were not keeping pace in innovation with the broader totality of components that go into a smart phone. He said they were running up against these limitations and I believe he was kind of calling out the larger tech sector for lagging on this. This would be before the AirPods came out.My point being that there could be limitations to what they can incorporate into a product without sacrificing its core functionality. I would have liked the tap to pause/play/etc feature to have carried over to the AirPods Pro but I suspect the reduction in size meant this couldn’t happen.
Anyway, I’d be surprised if they weren’t looking into the functionality you want to see, but it’s not necessarily a slam dunk of a product enhancement just because some people would find it useful. There has to be demand and the smooth integration Apple demands. Also, it would be a bit of a niche product to incorporate hearing aid functionality into AirPods when the majority of consumers don’t need that. Apple does a fair bit in accessibility to accommodate those who need it, so it’s not like they’re complete slackers.
 
Enough with the "copying" garbage. Samsung was the first of the two companies with true wireless earbuds. Their Gear IconX headphones preceded the AirPods to market by 6 months. (They rebranded their wearables division, dropping the "Gear", in 2018.) And in the going on 5 years since Apple released the AirPods, there has been absolutely no attempt by Samsung to emulate their form or function. Instead, Samsung has continued to iterate on their pre-existing product. The same with their smartwatches: preceded the Apple Watch by 2 years, introduced LTE to smartwatches back when everyone mocked it as a ridiculous concept, and continue to mostly do their own thing with it regardless of what Apple's product does.

I know that a lot of people are still salty over the "rounded corners/home button/pinch to zoom" thing but seriously that was 2009. Since Samsung went in their own direction with the Galaxy Note - and "phablets" in general - and became the largest selling smartphone company in the world as a result, the most significant idea that Samsung has gotten from Apple was dropping the headphone jack. By contrast, since then Apple has adopted A) the phablet form factor, B) the multi-tasking UI features, C) stylus support, D) curved OLED screens, E) dropped the home button, F) will within the next 2 years adopt in screen fingerprint scanners and foldable phones ... modern iPhones have far more in common with the look and UX/UI of Samsung Galaxy phones - and this will be the case even more so when iOS 14 is released - than they do all iPhones released before the iPhone 6. But Samsung won't sue because they are making far more money selling Apple the components that Apple uses to make iPhones more closely resemble Samsung phones!
Yeah, in typical fashion, Samsung heard Apple was producing a product and rushed a CRAP-QUALITY device to market in order to be able to exclaim "1st!"

The original Galaxy true wireless buds were widely panned as substandard and HORRIBLE.

ALSO — they were not original, there were several models ALREADY on the market, and which were superior. Samsung DID copy the looks and features of those models.

How do I know? Because I had several of the predecessors—the actual 'first' products. And even though they did suffer from problems, they were ALL better than Samsung's crappy first attempt.

I had the Bragi Headphone had great battery life, good sound, fit snugly in the ears for passive noise isolation, and were solid in terms of connectivity. These were released in 2016-2017. Bragi made two models — The Dash, and a less expensive version, The Headphone. I purchased the latter. The only difference between the two was removal of touch functionality in exchange for tiny buttons. Which made them very affordable at the time.

After those, I decided to go 'all-in' and spend more for higher quality and better sound (the Bragi had great sound but did not get loud enough and weren't set deeply enough in the ear canal to passively block sound properly.

So I purchased the 2017 v1 Bang & Olufsen e8 — but I waited 3 months for the software to be updated. They were perfect, and had amazing sound. They still work today. I loved them so much, I upgraded last year to the 2019 version 2. These passively block around 20 decibels of sound — which is about as good as you can get with a passive aural block. I am tempted by the new v3, which has extended battery life (by +3 hours) due to Bluetooth 5.1, but I suspect the next version will include ANC. That would make them perfect!
 
I guess he’s implying that they are inferior in some way. Meanwhile, if you check the sites that do not push an agenda, the reviews are stellar. Not saying this reviews was bad, but comparing them to the Apple product is a crappy way to review a new product.
lol you pretty much saying Chicago is inferior if you came up with that response or do you find the people in chicago inferior
 
All this arguing over true wireless buds and I have never found out exactly why there was a $299 price tag on early models of Beats WIRED headphones. THAT, was the only inferior thing I remember. I mean, an 80s pair of KOSS headphones at K-mart for $20 were far better sounding than a pair of Beats. It's like they intentionally overpriced them.
 
Samsung's ******** vs Apple's ********.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.