Or maybe Apple is telling Samsung to go ******* themselves for copying the iPhone and iPad.
That's not how the big-boy world works. Apple likes to diversify their supply chain and put suppliers against each other to get the best deal.
Or maybe Apple is telling Samsung to go ******* themselves for copying the iPhone and iPad.
$425? Retracing to 50% off its highs is uncharacteristic for AAPL stock. I believe we are near the bottom and I will not go much lower then $525. So stating to buy now is a pretty good bet.
Oh yes, bad math. I guess I meant in my mind that a move up from $425 to its highs would be 50%.I generally agree but you cited some bad math. 645 to 485 is a 24.8% retracement. 645 to 425 is a 34.1% retracement.
But I believe a 30% retracement for a stock like Apple would not be a bullish sign, as it would brake some major support levels. In any case I don't think it will happend. Hopefully we are currently near the bottom and Apple stock should be a good buy for the next couple of years. I just hope Apple will fill some gaps offering choices in iPhone and iPad screen sizes.A 30% retracement is "major" and would set-up a long and strong bull run. It might only go there a few minutes or hours.
I cited specific support levels. One, the top of a channel at 485 that has years of duration, and one a rather large price gap at 425. We already broke below a rising trend line off the bottom of the channel test this week. There is another moderate rising trend it is approaching now and if it breaks below that the channel top is the likely strong support point. 485. This is all technical pricing talk. Nothing to do with fundamentals, product release cycles, and such "mundane facts".it would brake some major support levels
Apple is the new Microsoft!!!
and next A6 chip build by Intel????
I'm liking this move closer to Japan. IMO, they are the only Asian Nation still with Honor. They won't screw you like S. Korea.
REUNIFICATION!!!!![]()
I'm liking this move closer to Japan. IMO, they are the only Asian Nation still with Honor. They won't screw you like S. Korea.
REUNIFICATION!!!!![]()
What's Digitimes accuracy percentage? This has nothing to do with bigotry as you suggest, just facts.I'm just tired of the fools always bagging on MacRumors, AppleInsider, or 9to5mac for sourcing Digitimes.
I'm liking this move closer to Japan. IMO, they are the only Asian Nation still with Honor. They won't screw you like S. Korea.
REUNIFICATION!!!!![]()
Just because it is not listed does not mean a company does not exist. They could have been bought out and gone private. All of Samsung's US subsidiaries are private and not listed.Define "OK". Elpida isn't even listed on the Tokio Stock Exchange anymore... This rumor is really fishy.
Taiwanese ODM's accounts for 90% of world's PCs and a big chunk of mobile devices...
Apple needs Samsung more then Samsung Apple. Samsung is developing new technologies and manufacturing real quality components. Apple can't manufacture any mobile components nor even assemble them. Apple is about style and marketing. They could not even design a working antena for the iPhone 4.
Apple makes only 2.6% of Samsung business. This is nothing considering skyrocketing demand. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samsung_Electronics#Major_customersNo, Samsung needs Apple more than Apple needs Samsung. They are their best customer, and if Apple takes their NAND and LCD business elsewhere, those units of Samsung would suffer.
So why then non-retina iMac display is still made by LG? No other LCD maker could come even close competing with Samsung, LG, and Sharp on combination of quality/production capacity/cost. They pretty much own the market also being ahead in new OLED technologies.If Apple didn't request a "Retina Display," chances are pretty good that neither Samsung, LG, nor Sharp would produce them.
I think the point was nobody else is ordering them. So they wouldn't be making them.So why then non-retina iMac display is still made by LG? No other LCD maker could come even close competing with Samsung, LG, and Sharp on combination of quality/production capacity/cost. They pretty much own the market also being ahead in new OLED technologies.
Engadget has just reported that Samsung mass-produces 4-gigabit LPDDR2 memory, aims to make 2GB a common sight in smartphones. Is it time for Apple to start begging Samsung to take them back? Or will they stick with measly 500MB RAM for iPhone?
Sorry, but my sarcasm meter is not working today.No Apple will never beg. But they will sue Samsung for discrimination...
no apple will never beg. But they will sue samsung for discrimination...
Sorry, but my sarcasm meter is not working today.
No company can sue another company for refusing to sell product to them.
It happens all the time.
Samsung has no obligation to sell its memory to anyone.
They can pick and choose at their discretion.