Sapphire quality?

Discussion in 'Apple Watch' started by cap7ainclu7ch, Sep 26, 2018.

  1. cap7ainclu7ch macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2010
    #1
    I've had my S0 since release and haven't had any scratches on the display, however my friend got a S3 last year and has noticed some scratches which made me curious, especially after seeing the "sapphire" on the iPhone camera's are actually just a low quality mix that scratches at around the same point that glass does. Has Apple been changing the quality of the sapphire since the S0 or has it always been a low quality sapphire that can scratch at lower Mohs?

    I'm just curious because the sapphire is the main reason why I upgraded to the SS model and I'd be very disappointed if I scratched it. However I guess if they haven't modified it and my S0 didn't scratch I should just use it and not worry about it. Just disappointed to see tests where it scratches at a level 6 when a real sapphire watch holds up until level 8. Hoping that the S4 might have a better sapphire quality but not holding my breath.
     
  2. Bazooka-joe macrumors 68020

    Bazooka-joe

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2012
    Location:
    Swindon, England
    #2
    Had an S3 ceramic for a year and when i sold it, it was like new so no issues with the screen
     
  3. Mercenary macrumors 65816

    Mercenary

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2012
    #3
    The quality is lower. Plenty of vids on YouTube that show the original watch standing up to an 8 on the mohs hardness scale but recent 'sapphire' watches scratching at a 6. Same as the ion-x glass.

    It does contain aluminium oxide so can be called sapphire but it's the same crappy stuff that's on the camera lens
     
  4. cap7ainclu7ch thread starter macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2010
    #4
    Thats super disappointing!
     
  5. mavis, Sep 26, 2018
    Last edited: Sep 26, 2018

    mavis macrumors 68040

    mavis

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2007
    Location:
    Tokyo, Japan
    #5
    I had my S0 for two and a half years - it was absolutely prefect when I sold it. I've had this S3 for nine months and it already has numerous scratches (and I'm really careful with my watch, as always) ...


    B959509D-9F09-4CE7-B70B-AD40989047B7.jpeg
     
  6. resmania macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2014
    #6
    Those fine scratches are most likely from the oleophobic coating.
     
  7. mavis, Sep 26, 2018
    Last edited: Sep 26, 2018

    mavis macrumors 68040

    mavis

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2007
    Location:
    Tokyo, Japan
    #7
    No. The oleophobic coating is only several microns thick. These scratches are deep enough to feel with a fingernail.

    Here are four more. Again, I baby my watch - I have absolutely no idea how these scratches got there, as I've never dropped the watch, I don't use my Milanese loop band anymore, and it's never been scraped against a wall, etc.


    D015D302-8534-46A4-B7FE-07D27923A03D.jpeg
     
  8. cap7ainclu7ch, Sep 26, 2018
    Last edited: Sep 26, 2018

    cap7ainclu7ch thread starter macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2010
    #8
    Kind of makes me want to go with the sport instead of SS...Did the quality change on the S3? Seems like most people with scratched sapphire have S3's.
     
  9. Relentless Power macrumors Penryn

    Relentless Power

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2016
    #9
    Let me just tell you this, I have only owned the stainless Apple Watches since They launched. I have used them on a daily basis and have hit the displays on random objects, with no screen protector use whatsoever and sold them in flawless condition with the displays. Obviously every situation with Vary, but I think you’re going to find out that you be more disappointed with the Ion-X Glass versus the Sapphire. The Sapphire alone is worth the price tag if you can justify that if you don’t want to see small scratches on your display.

    And for the record, when I did on the sport model, I sold it within _less_ than a week because I did not care for the durability of the Ion– X Glass.
     
  10. ectospheno macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2005
    #10
    Just leaving this here...

     
  11. cap7ainclu7ch thread starter macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2010
    #11
    I don't understand how some people test it and get those results while others have it scratch at 6 on the scale. Maybe it's batch related?
     
  12. mavis macrumors 68040

    mavis

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2007
    Location:
    Tokyo, Japan
    #12
    I think that would explain the disparity ... I mean, to have almost ten scratches on my 9-month-old S3 seems a bit excessive to me - especially since I work in an office, and haven't yet worn the S3 while working on my car, etc. They're tiny scratches, but DEEP - definitely not just scratches in the oleophobic coating. My S0 was perfect though, after 2.5 years of use - working on cars, snorkeling, playing volleyball on the beach, various home repairs where it scraped against walls, etc.
     
  13. cap7ainclu7ch thread starter macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2010
    #13
    I think sapphire can vary a good amount from batch to batch so maybe that's it and it's kind of just luck of the draw? Or maybe apple modified it well into S3 production? Do you mind me asking when you bought yours?
     
  14. barjam macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2010
    #14
    I tried to go aluminum with the three and scratched the face in a weekend. My SS 3 has been every bit as resistant as my original s0 and I absolutely abuse this thing. I work on cars with it, I have slammed it into things and so on. It is still pristine.

    Those same lame videos were around with the S0 as well, I remember back then people were saying apple used crap sapphire. Besides, I would trust consumer reports over a bunch of random folks on youtube.
     
  15. mavis macrumors 68040

    mavis

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2007
    Location:
    Tokyo, Japan
    #15
    Got mine last December. Serial starts with FH7VC ...
     
  16. willentrekin macrumors regular

    willentrekin

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2013
    Location:
    US
    #16
    I briefly had an SS, until I realized I'd bought it with a hairline crack through the screen (long but extremely thin). I have no idea what the previous owner had done with it. But it was the Series 2. I'd upgraded to it from an aluminum S1, and upgraded from it to an aluminum S3.

    Besides the hardness, I'd also mention impact resistance. From what I've seen, the sapphire screens are more resistant to scratching, but that makes them more susceptible to chips and cracks from impacts. The Ion-X screen may be more susceptible to scratching when scored in a laboratory, but from all the tests I've seen, withstands a fall from a similar height better than its sapphire counterpart.

    Mind you, all the test I've seen have been on YouTube.

    (This and haptic feedback were the factors I made purchase decisions on. Aluminum is lighter, and I seem to feel notifications and vibrations better on a aluminum version than the stainless. Disappointingly.)
     
  17. Otflyer macrumors 6502a

    Otflyer

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2017
    Location:
    SF Bay Area
    #17
    Nothings perfect.
     
  18. cap7ainclu7ch, Sep 26, 2018
    Last edited: Sep 26, 2018

    cap7ainclu7ch thread starter macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2010
    #18
    Just went to the Apple store and the SS display models were pretty scratched up. The back said they were sapphire (some people in another thread were saying that the SS display units might have ionx to save money). I'm probably still going to go SS this round but I'm still not convinced that the Sapphire quality hasn't gone down. I know it's silly but I loved the confidence I had in my S0 that it just wouldn't scratch.
     

    Attached Files:

  19. vintagekeys macrumors regular

    vintagekeys

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2018
    Location:
    Hong Kong
    #19
    Interesting, now i am super hard debating between a regular alloy version which is 40% cheaper then the SS.
    Alloy LTE 4000HKD VS 6000HKD in hong kong, meaning i safe half the money in case i lose/watch get stolen to purchase another one in that same year.

    THe only reason i want SS is for the saphire glass but from what i see its not holy and still scratches. I WILL scratch the screen, that`s just me, just not sure if the 200 bucks extra is going to be worth it, as that 200 USD can be invested in another AW5 next year.

    If both Saphire and ion-x screens going to scratch regardless then i just as well just buy a little screen protector and buy the cheaper variant.

    Just to summerise: I skate in skateparks (not with the watch on, but to give a idea that i am active with sports), i am a bit clumbsy, its super bussy in HK so people constantly walking into each other. i work in IT and have to be in server rooms and under tables.
     
  20. yoheywut macrumors member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2015
    #20
    I’ll be watching this thread to see if any developments or tests of the series 4 come out. I could see them saving money with the display models by using Ion X glass, but realistically it might be costly in it’s own way to specially prepare a bunch of SS models without sapphire, when they could simply be taking them from the massive assembly line they already have cranking production models out. Maybe Jerry Rig Everything will post a video.
     
  21. vintagekeys macrumors regular

    vintagekeys

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2018
    Location:
    Hong Kong
    #21
    Yeah honestly i think they do not mess with that, and they are actually saphire screens, meaning that most likely the coating is the one scratching and making it just look like a regular ion-x glass, so it defeats the purpose of having a scratch free screen.
     
  22. Ron21 macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2007
    #22
    I think it's definitely a good idea to get a screen protector for any model. I had an S0 SS with a scratched screen, so the sapphire is low quality for sure.

    My other regular mechanical watch with sapphire glass doesn't have a single mark in 10 years.
     
  23. mackie8 macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2014
    #23
    im waiting for jerry rig too haha.... for now im rocking alum GPS S4 ... while waiting for the SS GOLD in mid OCT...still deciding if i want to keep this alum model plus applecare or move on with the SS Gold plus applecare .... i can save $400 (SGD) if i stay with alum model... i dont use LTE too
     
  24. cap7ainclu7ch thread starter macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2010
    #24
    I just want some answers as to why there seems to be some watches out there that don't scratch and some that do. Consumer reports clearly got watches that exceed the expectations of what the apple sapphire should accomplish yet jerry rig had his scratch at the level that glass does. Something doesn't add up here.
     
  25. vintagekeys macrumors regular

    vintagekeys

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2018
    Location:
    Hong Kong
    #25
    I think it has to do with rigged tests and tests that do not represent daily carry wear. I also suspect as people say here bad batches of low quality saphire compared to the S0 Saphire glass used initially.
     

Share This Page

41 September 26, 2018