I’m glad that worked out for you, but realistically it’s only doable in enterprise. I’m talking more about your average user as most iCloud accounts are probably personal accounts. How would you go about educating them systematically? Phishing attacks exists to exploit the knowledge gap of the average user and tech literate users. If all users are educated enough then phishing methods will evolve with it. At the consumer level it’s safer to design a product that has room for user ignorance and stupidity.
Technology, especially consumer technology, should be designed for people. If people are the problem then the technology was designed poorly. More often than not it’s low tech literacy, not outright stupidity. Most users probably didn’t bother with 2FA until they set up a new device or update the OS. It’s not realistic to expect everyone to be on the same page.
True. In any competent software development training, you are taught that users will do any and everything. For input, that includes assuming they might enter nothing or any combination of characters to text boxes; and in general, a user can click/tap and drag any or every UI element, press any combination of key combos, and more.
The three common reasons are:
• Lack of understanding what’s needed by the user — this may require more instructions as part of the UX
• Boredom or frustration — users will do actions and inputs the developer could never imagined
• Exploitation — for example,
HTML injection attacks
Anticipating and compensating for these is one of the biggest design challenges, although, extremely important. It’s not the only safeguard, however, a great first line of defense can make the inner protections seem stronger.
In fact, a good test plan will involve at least one group of people who are significantly tech illiterate or cavalier in their device usage behaviors.
First rule of a free society: if what you do only affects yourself, you should be free to do it.
All of the people blaming the victims for either the types of pictures they keep or their susceptibility to a scam are missing the point. No one should be shamed for whatever personal photos they have and, while there are practical steps we should probably take to protect ourselves from the criminally minded, it's not a crime to not follow those steps and it is still a crime to violate people who don't.
If I leave a gold bar on my front porch and someone takes it without my permission, that is theft. It is not my fault, it is the thief's.
You’re correct, though naivety is excusable to an limit. Using your gold bar anecdote…. Yes, you're wrong to leave it there and wrong for someone to take it. However, you shouldn’t be surprised if the gold is missing in the morning and it is never found. Back to the nude photos topic… Indeed, you’re allowed to have nude snapshots/recordings of yourself — I can’t think of a reason that’s not 🤦♂️ but I digress. The problem is those nude media files are probably not for your own nostalgia; at the very least, they’ll be shared privately (or so a person thinks). Whether a cloud server or a seemingly trusted friend, the moment a copy of something leaves your control, it has the potential to go any and everywhere.
Does the iPhone ML recognize variable noses?
Human horn? (
Futurama reference)