Samsung phones gave me a headache. I’m not finding pwm problematic on the max, though some do....There’s really no way to avoid PWM on the XS phones, even at 100% brightness.
Samsung phones gave me a headache. I’m not finding pwm problematic on the max, though some do....There’s really no way to avoid PWM on the XS phones, even at 100% brightness.
It’s not as straightforward as the other OEMs. Folded screens were only a reality with iPhone X last year.I don't think they are that expensive. Other phones like the pixel, huwawei etc manage to have OLED screens on their phones (made by Samsung) and don't charge as much as Apple does for the iphone. OLED has been around on phones for years. It's not new or cutting edge.
If you can’t tell the difference, an eye exam would be beneficial.
Samsung has a flexible display. LG and Samsung showed off folded displays as far back as 2013/14.It’s not as straightforward as the other OEMs. Folded screens were only a reality with iPhone X last year.
That Foobar, reales.
An Eye with 20/20 Vision (Which have the Most Users) cannot Tell the Differnce at 10 Inches (Healthy Distance)!. Their Vision is max 316ppi.
That is proven.
Samsung has a flexible display. LG and Samsung showed off folded displays as far back as 2013/14.
Why don’t you look at the XR display in person and make that judgment for yourself. On here, you’re going to have others tell you that the XR display is ‘terrible’, ‘blurry’ and then you will have others who will tell you that the XR display is perfectly fine the way it is. I think the XR display looks great, but that’s my own viewpoint.
....and test it in a way that no one who reviews displays seems to want to bother with....with small text. Images, apps and big text will probably not reveal much of a difference. But if you read a newspaper website where the point size can be quite small I'm betting there will be a difference. That's what I noticed when I flipped from the Plus iPhones to Android (which had higher resolution screens for a good stretch of time)....the small text print was easily inferior and more difficult to read on the iphones. I'll need to see for myself next time I stop into a BB or carrier store with my Max in hand.
To round it up. There is a noticeable difference in sharpness from the XR to the 8 Plus to the XS but it is not important. When comparing devices you see/recognize the difference in clarity but then you forget about it again. Difference is there but it’s not overwhelmingly different.
The more important questions should be:
1. Since for example Netflix does not allow the XR a 1080p playback, only 720p (software regulated), all of a sudden the whole discussion does matter.
Because, not be able to stream 1080p on such a large screen, could be problematic!!! I did not have a chance to test it yet. Any comments on that matter from you guys?
2. I also do not know, if all the other platforms (iTunes, Youtube) even allow streaming in a higher resolution than 720p?
3. And why would you (Netflix) regulate the resolution for a device that has almost a 1080p display?
Thanks
[doublepost=1547154142][/doublepost]And here is proof from Netflix Help Site.
[doublepost=1547154344][/doublepost]Sorry for uploading the German version. But you can identify the key facts right?!
That certainly has not been proven. It depends on someone's eye sight. 900 PPI even @ 12 inches, according to this source:
https://www.cultofmac.com/173702/why-retina-isnt-enough-feature/
This source claims 1000 PPI likely just depending, but they both are well over 316 PPI:
"Research from Sun Microsystems estimated the limit to be at least 2X what 20/20 vision is (pdf link), and Sharp thinks that humans can see up to 1000 PPI (pdf link)."
https://www.ubergizmo.com/what-is/ppi-pixels-per-inch/
Die dpi read my Post ? I Said 20/20 Vision which habe the Most, but there are some with 20/15,20/10. And it is proven, it is simple Marhematics paired with a Visiontest.
Do you have any research proof of what you are claiming? I'm using actual sources for my claims.
I took a specific excerpt below, but there's a lot of info in that Cult of Mac link to at least question any 300 PPI "proof". The research from Sun Micro Systems was pretty consistent, and actually a bit higher PPI than the 951 PPI one below.
"J. Blackwell of the Optical Society of America determined back in 1946 that the resolution of the human eye was actually closer to 0.35 arc minutes. Again, this means that for an iPhone 4S to have a true Retina display, it would need pixels that were 65% smaller than it currently has."
65% smaller so it's claiming 951 PPI for true retina resolution.
That source was giving a formula 12 inches away, when you quoted 10, so that's farther and higher.
https://www.cultofmac.com/173702/why-retina-isnt-enough-feature/