Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
SD Card Slot in New MacBook Pros Supports UHS-II With Speeds Up to 250 MB/s [Updated]
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Good plan. But I'd need a 4 TB one and if one existed, it would bankrupt me.
Still works fine on my first retina MBP from 2012. It is still my main laptop until the 14 inch hopefully arrives next week
I feel like ethernet ports on laptops in 2021 is such a niche requirement that you may aswell just buy an ethernet to usb-c adapter and leave it attached to your ethernet cable
As long as you don’t need to access whatever’s on there quickly.
All of my daily devices support SD cards (desktop, notebook, tablet, phone). The return of the SD card slot on the MBP is a welcomed change. But I am curious as to the reason why Apple felt the need to bring it back at this time.
300 MB/s is not nothing. You do not want to boot off it, but documents / videos / photos work fine at that speed.
Meh. Give me a cfexpress/xqd slot and we can talk.
That is better than expected so those still using SD cards will have about as good as it goes, great for consumers but professionals have long moved on to CF Express (1700 MB/s at the same £ per GB).
Fine for JPG's but you don't want to editing or accessing 45 MP RAW files from it. Better than expected considering they advertise it as SDXC.
An SD card is not a long term backup. SD cards fail all too frequently and are often used in pairs or as a very short term backup to a CF Express card. It isn't something you can rely on and recovering from a failure is going to be slow and potentially full of errors.
Awesome, excellent a fast card slot that i'll never use.
Would've been cool to see a combined SD and micro SD slot. Also would have been good to see CFExpress given its popularity.
UHS-III will never see the light of day in a camera. SD Express is being pushed to take on CF Express Type A, though the downside of that is all your old cards get knocked back to UHS-I speeds.
The cost of a USB-C to ethernet adapter is so low. I'm a big fan of ethernet but having it in a laptop is pretty niche.
If you are at a desk then there's a decent chance (like myself) you have a USB-C/TB3 hub that everything plugs into then one cable into the MacBook. If you are someone who needs to use ethernet a lot then it's really not going to kill you to carry round a tiny adapter. I don't think ethernet would even fit into this machine.
No seriously, just use the correct adapter, this is ridiculous thinking.
How long would it take to do a Time Machine backup to an SD card? I know, it depends... but I stopped using TM years ago because it took hours and hours to do a backup (to an admittedly old WD My Cloud drive, done wired and WiFi at different times). Given that I keep all my pertinent data in the Documents directory, and that is backed up to iCloud, I didn't see the need to use a separate device for TM, anyway.
Last edited:
I think this continues to support the thought that someone smarter than me (sorry I forget who) tweeted: that to achieve this, Apple took one of the 4 max thunderbolt ports and split it into these new ports. All of the new ports could have limitations because they all feed into the bandwidth of a single thunderbolt port. Put another way, Apple built the dongle in so you don't have to carry it. I think this is a good tradeoff, and the limitations so far don't seem to outweigh the benefits of having these ports always with you. If you need better, use a dongle with the actual thunderbolt ports, but that is a far less likely scenario.
I am more interested in whether the SD slot can act as an urgent alt boot port for installing macOS or trouble shooting. Doesn’t seem likely given how locked up Apple Silicon is though.
The other application of the slot is as someone already mentioned, the short flush custom cards or even a micro SD tray. Great for cold data that doesn’t need the speed of internal NVMe nor the redundancy of APFS.
The other application of the slot is as someone already mentioned, the short flush custom cards or even a micro SD tray. Great for cold data that doesn’t need the speed of internal NVMe nor the redundancy of APFS.
That's how it always worked anyway - previously this stuff just ran as basically built in USB adapters - you could see it all on a built in USB hub in the machine, including the Facetime camera.
But now we lost one TB3 port for a HDMI port that most will never use or at best use infrequently. And a SD slot when consumer DSLR's have been replaced with smartphones and professional cameras use CF Express A and B. It is a really questionable time to re-introduce these ports. But at least Engadget and the like won't be able to mark down the lack of a
Awesome to find out that Apple is using the UHS-II SD card and not just UHS-I SD card read/write speed.
Does anyone know if this slot supports the new SDUC standard for card sizes 4TB and up?
For many, this could mean the difference between a £1200 upgrade now for storage space I may not even need in the future vs. a couple of hundred £ in a few years' time for a micro-SD card and a £25 adapter.
For many, this could mean the difference between a £1200 upgrade now for storage space I may not even need in the future vs. a couple of hundred £ in a few years' time for a micro-SD card and a £25 adapter.
Really happy to see an SD card slot come back. Our aircraft avionics databases are updated every 28 days via SD card so having the slot on the Mac makes it easy now.